The Singing Machine Company, Inc.
The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (MICS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MICS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICS | $0.74 | +1.89% | 7.2M | -0.50 | -$1.49 | N/A |
| AAPL | $248.96 | -0.39% | 3.7T | 31.47 | $7.91 | +0.42% |
| SONY | $20.62 | +1.18% | 123.1B | 15.98 | $1.29 | +0.51% |
| NXT | $118.74 | +2.91% | 17.6B | 30.29 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.07 | +1.12% | 4.1B | 27.13 | $0.15 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $13.43 | +0.75% | 1.6B | -83.94 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| TBCH | $11.23 | -1.06% | 222.4M | 12.62 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MICS vs AAPL Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while AAPL trades at $248.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 31.47. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check AAPL's competition here
MICS vs SONY Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 123.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while SONY trades at $20.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check SONY's competition here
MICS vs NXT Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while NXT trades at $118.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 30.29. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check NXT's competition here
MICS vs LPL Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while LPL trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 27.13. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check LPL's competition here
MICS vs BWSN Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BWSN's competition here
MICS vs VZIO Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VZIO's competition here
MICS vs SONO Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while SONO trades at $13.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -83.94. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check SONO's competition here
MICS vs HEAR Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check HEAR's competition here
MICS vs TBCH Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 222.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while TBCH trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check TBCH's competition here
MICS vs ZEPP Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while ZEPP trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check ZEPP's competition here
MICS vs VUZI Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 175.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VUZI trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VUZI's competition here
MICS vs VOXX Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VOXX's competition here
MICS vs GPRO Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while GPRO trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check GPRO's competition here
MICS vs BWNB Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BWNB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BWNB's competition here
MICS vs KOSS Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while KOSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -43.56. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check KOSS's competition here
MICS vs FEBO Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while FEBO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check FEBO's competition here
MICS vs PXDT Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check PXDT's competition here
MICS vs MSN Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while MSN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check MSN's competition here
MICS vs UTME Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check UTME's competition here
MICS vs RIME Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while RIME trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check RIME's competition here
MICS vs WTO Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WTO trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WTO's competition here
MICS vs WLDSW Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 808.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WLDSW trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WLDSW's competition here
MICS vs BOXL Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BOXL trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BOXL's competition here
MICS vs WLDS Comparison March 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 420.2K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WLDS trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is -13.09%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WLDS's competition here