Masco Corporation

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 95.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while TT trades at $428.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check TT's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while JCI trades at $105.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check JCI's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 56.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while CARR trades at $65.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 38.22. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check CARR's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while LII trades at $599.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 25.69. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check LII's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while CSL trades at $391.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check CSL's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while BLDR trades at $138.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check BLDR's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while OC trades at $151.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas OC's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to OC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check OC's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while WMS trades at $139.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 25.45. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check WMS's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while AWI trades at $194.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check AWI's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while FBHS trades at $61.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check FBHS's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while SSD trades at $191.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check SSD's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while AZEK trades at $54.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check AZEK's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while BECN trades at $124.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check BECN's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, IBP has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while IBP trades at $266.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas IBP's P/E ratio is 29.55. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to IBP's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to IBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check IBP's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while FBIN trades at $58.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check FBIN's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while TREX trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check TREX's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while AAON trades at $83.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 55.66. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check AAON's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while GMS trades at $109.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check GMS's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while DOOR trades at $132.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check DOOR's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while PGTI trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check PGTI's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while ROCK trades at $61.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check ROCK's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while JBI trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check JBI's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 970M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while NX trades at $21.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas NX's P/E ratio is 57.03. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to NX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check NX's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 924.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while APOG trades at $43.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check APOG's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 897.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while SWIM trades at $7.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is -64.17. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to SWIM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check SWIM's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 628.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while BXC trades at $77.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check BXC's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 585.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while ASPN trades at $7.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check ASPN's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 501.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while JELD trades at $5.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to JELD's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check JELD's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 216.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while PPIH trades at $27.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 17.53. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check PPIH's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 157.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while PHOE trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 146.00. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check PHOE's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 52.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while CSTE trades at $1.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check CSTE's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 48.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while APT trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check APT's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while AIRJW trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check AIRJW's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while AEHL trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check AEHL's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while ILAG trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check ILAG's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while VIEW trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check VIEW's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check VIEWW's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while FRTA trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check FRTA's competition here

MAS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MAS stands at 15.3B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MAS is priced at $73.57, while AFI trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MAS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.38, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MAS's ROE is -4.55%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MAS is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MAS.Check AFI's competition here