Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.
Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. (FBHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FBHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
| TT | $452.23 | -1.78% | 99B | 34.17 | $13.11 | +0.86% |
| LII | $487.27 | -2.82% | 16.8B | 21.46 | $22.50 | +1.07% |
| CSL | $327.91 | -1.70% | 13.2B | 18.99 | $17.14 | +1.35% |
| AAON | $131.55 | -1.79% | 10.7B | 91.74 | $1.42 | +0.30% |
| WMS | $134.35 | -0.69% | 10.3B | 21.90 | $6.01 | +0.54% |
| OC | $109.01 | -2.84% | 8.7B | -22.82 | -$4.73 | +2.72% |
| AZEK | $54.35 | -0.93% | 7.8B | 52.77 | $1.03 | N/A |
| BECN | $124.17 | +0.00% | 7.7B | 25.39 | $4.89 | N/A |
| SSD | $179.91 | -1.15% | 7.3B | 20.90 | $8.52 | +0.65% |
Stock Comparison
FBHS vs TT Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 99B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TT trades at $452.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 34.17. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check TT's competition here
FBHS vs LII Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while LII trades at $487.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check LII's competition here
FBHS vs CSL Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSL trades at $327.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check CSL's competition here
FBHS vs AAON Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AAON trades at $131.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 91.74. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AAON's competition here
FBHS vs WMS Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while WMS trades at $134.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check WMS's competition here
FBHS vs OC Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while OC trades at $109.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check OC's competition here
FBHS vs AZEK Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AZEK's competition here
FBHS vs BECN Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check BECN's competition here
FBHS vs SSD Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SSD trades at $179.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check SSD's competition here
FBHS vs BLDR Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BLDR trades at $67.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 25.33. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check BLDR's competition here
FBHS vs AWI Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AWI trades at $155.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AWI's competition here
FBHS vs GMS Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check GMS's competition here
FBHS vs FBIN Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FBIN trades at $33.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check FBIN's competition here
FBHS vs TREX Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while TREX trades at $36.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 20.13. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check TREX's competition here
FBHS vs DOOR Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check DOOR's competition here
FBHS vs PGTI Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check PGTI's competition here
FBHS vs ROCK Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ROCK trades at $34.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check ROCK's competition here
FBHS vs NX Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 758.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while NX trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check NX's competition here
FBHS vs APOG Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 706.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APOG trades at $33.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 13.21. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check APOG's competition here
FBHS vs JBI Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 645.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JBI trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 15.78. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check JBI's competition here
FBHS vs SWIM Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SWIM trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 68.29. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check SWIM's competition here
FBHS vs ASPN Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 418.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ASPN trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check ASPN's competition here
FBHS vs BXC Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 364.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while BXC trades at $47.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is -95.59. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BXC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check BXC's competition here
FBHS vs PHOE Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 331.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PHOE trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 511.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check PHOE's competition here
FBHS vs PPIH Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 244.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while PPIH trades at $31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check PPIH's competition here
FBHS vs JELD Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 122.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while JELD trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check JELD's competition here
FBHS vs APT Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 62.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while APT trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check APT's competition here
FBHS vs SMJF Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while SMJF trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 129.67. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check SMJF's competition here
FBHS vs CSTE Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while CSTE trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check CSTE's competition here
FBHS vs ILAG Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while ILAG trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check ILAG's competition here
FBHS vs AEHL Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AEHL trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AEHL's competition here
FBHS vs VIEW Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check VIEW's competition here
FBHS vs VIEWW Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check VIEWW's competition here
FBHS vs LAYN Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while LAYN trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check LAYN's competition here
FBHS vs FRTA Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check FRTA's competition here
FBHS vs AFI Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check AFI's competition here
FBHS vs HW Comparison May 2026
FBHS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FBHS stands at 7.9B. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FBHS is priced at $61.90, while HW trades at $24.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FBHS currently has a P/E ratio of 10.96, whereas HW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FBHS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FBHS is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FBHS.Check HW's competition here