Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while FBHS trades at $61.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check FBHS's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while AZEK trades at $54.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check AZEK's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while BECN trades at $124.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is similarly volatile compared to BECN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check BECN's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while GMS trades at $109.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to GMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check GMS's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while DOOR trades at $132.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check DOOR's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while PGTI trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check PGTI's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while JELD trades at $1.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JELD's ROE of -10.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check JELD's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIEW trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check VIEW's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check VIEWW's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while AFI trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check AFI's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while FRTA trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check FRTA's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while HW trades at $24.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas HW's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to HW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check HW's competition here