Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while LII trades at $541.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check LII's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while WMS trades at $141.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check WMS's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while AAON trades at $102.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 70.32. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check AAON's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while FBHS trades at $61.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check FBHS's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while AZEK trades at $54.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check AZEK's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while BECN trades at $124.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is similarly volatile compared to BECN. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check BECN's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while AWI trades at $160.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check AWI's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while TREX trades at $43.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check TREX's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while GMS trades at $109.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to GMS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check GMS's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while DOOR trades at $132.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check DOOR's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while PGTI trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check PGTI's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while ROCK trades at $45.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 12.99. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check ROCK's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 645.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while SWIM trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 42.31. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check SWIM's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 204M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while PPIH trades at $25.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check PPIH's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 94.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while JELD trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check JELD's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while SMJF trades at $5.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 186.00. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check SMJF's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while APT trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check APT's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while ILAG trades at $3.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check ILAG's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIEW trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check VIEW's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check VIEWW's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while AFI trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check AFI's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while HW trades at $24.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas HW's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to HW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check HW's competition here

Layne Christensen Co. (NASDAQ: LAYN) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LAYN stands at 0. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LAYN is priced at $15.41 on the NASDAQ, while FRTA trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LAYN currently has a P/E ratio of -13.48, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, LAYN's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LAYN is less volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LAYN.Check FRTA's competition here