Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while FBHS trades at $61.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check FBHS's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while AZEK trades at $54.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check AZEK's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while BECN trades at $124.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check BECN's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while GMS trades at $109.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check GMS's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while DOOR trades at $132.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check DOOR's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while PGTI trades at $42.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check PGTI's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 152.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while JELD trades at $1.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to JELD's ROE of -10.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to JELD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check JELD's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while VIEW trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check VIEW's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check VIEWW's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while FRTA trades at $24.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check FRTA's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, LAYN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while LAYN trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas LAYN's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LAYN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to LAYN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check LAYN's competition here

Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (NYSE: AFI) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, AFI stands at 0. In comparison, HW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AFI is priced at $0.35 on the NYSE, while HW trades at $24.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

AFI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.14, whereas HW's P/E ratio is 39.69. In terms of profitability, AFI's ROE is -0.25%, compared to HW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, AFI is more volatile compared to HW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AFI.Check HW's competition here