Lynas Rare Earths Limited
Lynas Rare Earths Limited (LYC.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LYC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYC.AX | A$19.97 | -0.25% | 20.5B | 254.88 | A$0.08 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$48.35 | -2.77% | 254.4B | 17.45 | A$2.87 | +3.91% |
| RIO.AX | A$151.35 | -2.47% | 254B | 18.00 | A$8.69 | +3.74% |
| FMG.AX | A$19.04 | -4.56% | 60.6B | 11.39 | A$1.73 | +6.19% |
| S32.AX | A$4.05 | -3.11% | 18.7B | 34.83 | A$0.12 | +2.84% |
| PLS.AX | A$4.13 | -11.56% | 14.8B | -153.00 | -A$0.03 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$51.42 | -6.78% | 10.7B | 26.88 | A$2.02 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$1.00 | +0.00% | 6.8B | 7.65 | A$0.13 | +5.76% |
| AII.AX | A$23.77 | -12.06% | 6.7B | -76.29 | -A$0.34 | N/A |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LYC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 254.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while BHP.AX trades at A$48.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 254B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while RIO.AX trades at A$151.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 60.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while FMG.AX trades at A$19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while S32.AX trades at A$4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is 34.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PLS.AX trades at A$4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -153.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MIN.AX trades at A$51.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ATM.AX trades at A$1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AII.AX trades at A$23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -76.29. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while IGO.AX trades at A$7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -27.26. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while LTR.AX trades at A$1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -46.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ILU.AX trades at A$6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ADT.AX trades at A$6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.96. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while DRR.AX trades at A$3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while DVP.AX trades at A$4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while IPX.AX trades at A$3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -17.61. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ELV.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ELV.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ELV.AX trades at A$6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ELV.AX's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ELV.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ELV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ELV.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -173.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MLX.AX trades at A$1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EQR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, EQR.AX has a market cap of 994.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while EQR.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas EQR.AX's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EQR.AX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EQR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EQR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 881M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -78.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs JAV.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, JAV.AX has a market cap of 857.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while JAV.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas JAV.AX's P/E ratio is -5.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JAV.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to JAV.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check JAV.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 835.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -45.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 746.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while BNZ.AX trades at A$2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -36.86. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of -2.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 680.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 676.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 669.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while VUL.AX trades at A$2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -8.74. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 667.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 665.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 582.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while SYA.AX trades at A$3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 582.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -24.92. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 571.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -48.37. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NMG.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, NMG.AX has a market cap of 543.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while NMG.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas NMG.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NMG.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NMG.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 521.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while A1G.AX trades at A$0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -30.67. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 521M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 502.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -42.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 501.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 489.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 481.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 448.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 8.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 446.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 434M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 374.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MMI.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is 3.05. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 353.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while INR.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 350.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is 0.35. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 339.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -18.62. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NVA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 336.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 333M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -26.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 326.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 319.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while RHI.AX trades at A$4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 300.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ASM.AX trades at A$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TGN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, TGN.AX has a market cap of 300.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while TGN.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas TGN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TGN.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TGN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TGN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 288.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while LOT.AX trades at A$1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MRL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MRL.AX has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MRL.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MRL.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MRL.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MRL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MRL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 247.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while A11.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 5.13. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check GRR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PLA.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PLA.AX has a market cap of 228.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PLA.AX trades at A$0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PLA.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PLA.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PLA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 223M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ORN.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ORN.AX has a market cap of 220.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ORN.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ORN.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORN.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ORN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ORN.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 210.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 195M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 193.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ETM.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ETM.AX has a market cap of 189M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ETM.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ETM.AX's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ETM.AX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ETM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ETM.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is -12.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VMS.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, VMS.AX has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while VMS.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas VMS.AX's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VMS.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VMS.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AGE.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 177.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 167.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 167.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 161.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -46.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check QGL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs KGL.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, KGL.AX has a market cap of 158M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while KGL.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas KGL.AX's P/E ratio is -20.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KGL.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to KGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check KGL.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs MEU.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, MEU.AX has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while MEU.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas MEU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MEU.AX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MEU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check MEU.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 153.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while ATR.AX trades at A$0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check ATR.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs AT4.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, AT4.AX has a market cap of 152.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while AT4.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas AT4.AX's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AT4.AX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AT4.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check AT4.AX's competition here
LYC.AX vs TMG.AX Comparison March 2026
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 20.5B. In comparison, TMG.AX has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$19.97, while TMG.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 254.88, whereas TMG.AX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TMG.AX's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.Check TMG.AX's competition here