Lynas Rare Earths Limited
Lynas Rare Earths Limited LYC.AX Peers
See (LYC.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYC.AX | A$10.12 | -0.10% | 9.5B | 202.40 | A$0.05 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$41.51 | +2.60% | 210.7B | 12.07 | A$3.44 | +4.58% |
| RIO.AX | A$118.32 | +3.37% | 161.9B | 10.90 | A$10.86 | +5.20% |
| FMG.AX | A$17.81 | +3.25% | 54.8B | 9.13 | A$1.95 | +7.80% |
| S32.AX | A$3.05 | +0.99% | 13.7B | -38.12 | -A$0.08 | +3.28% |
| ATM.AX | A$1.11 | +0.45% | 6.7B | 10.05 | A$0.11 | +5.19% |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
| MIN.AX | A$30.93 | +3.13% | 6B | -4.97 | -A$6.22 | N/A |
| PLS.AX | A$1.88 | +5.62% | 6B | -187.50 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| IGO.AX | A$5.22 | +5.03% | 3.9B | -3.70 | -A$1.41 | +7.09% |
Stock Comparison
LYC.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 210.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while BHP.AX trades at A$41.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while RIO.AX trades at A$118.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while FMG.AX trades at A$17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 9.13. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs S32.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while S32.AX trades at A$3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is -38.12. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ATM.AX trades at A$1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 10.05. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MIN.AX trades at A$30.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PLS.AX trades at A$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -187.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while IGO.AX trades at A$5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -12.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while LTR.AX trades at A$0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -48.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ILU.AX trades at A$5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 16.08. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ADT.AX trades at A$5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while IPX.AX trades at A$5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -15.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while BOE.AX trades at A$3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -55.57. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while DVP.AX trades at A$4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is -151.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AII.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AII.AX trades at A$6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -23.62. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -31.33. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 949.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while VUL.AX trades at A$4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -9.88. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 795.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 764.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 733.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -31.42. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of +74.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 612.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 576.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MLX.AX trades at A$0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 5.91. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 554.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs G6M.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while G6M.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 491.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -15.20. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 464M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while LOT.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 414.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MMI.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is -6.80. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 406.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 381M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -23.67. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 352.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs INR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 346M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while INR.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of +54.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 263.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while SYA.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 246.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 15.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 235.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 228.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while RHI.AX trades at A$3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 1.45. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while TLG.AX trades at A$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 214.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 208M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 205.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -40.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 188.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 175.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 165.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 163.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ATR.AX trades at A$0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.91. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 161.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -16.17. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 154.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs NMR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NMR.AX has a market cap of 151.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while NMR.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas NMR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NMR.AX's ROE of +20.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to NMR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs CII.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ASN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ASN.AX has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ASN.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ASN.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ASN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.25. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs STA.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 133.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 133.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 131.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while BNZ.AX trades at A$0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 129.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 129.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of -3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 127.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs BSX.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BSX.AX has a market cap of 125.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while BSX.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas BSX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BSX.AX's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to BSX.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ASM.AX trades at A$0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs TZN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TZN.AX has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while TZN.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas TZN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.60. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TZN.AX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to TZN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs MLG.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MLG.AX has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while MLG.AX trades at A$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas MLG.AX's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MLG.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to MLG.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs AGE.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AGE.AX has a market cap of 110.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while AGE.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas AGE.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGE.AX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to AGE.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs ZER.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ZER.AX has a market cap of 108.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while ZER.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas ZER.AX's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZER.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is more volatile compared to ZER.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 108M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while A1G.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -6.83. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs A11.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while A11.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs QPM.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, QPM.AX has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while QPM.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas QPM.AX's P/E ratio is 3.70. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QPM.AX's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to QPM.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 104.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.
LYC.AX vs PAN.AX Comparison
LYC.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LYC.AX stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PAN.AX has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LYC.AX is priced at A$10.12, while PAN.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LYC.AX currently has a P/E ratio of 202.40, whereas PAN.AX's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, LYC.AX's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAN.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LYC.AX is less volatile compared to PAN.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LYC.AX.