Larsen & Toubro Limited
Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LT.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT.BO | ₹4,258.50 | -3.59% | 5.9T | 33.29 | ₹127.91 | +0.80% |
| LT.NS | ₹4,259.20 | -3.60% | 5.9T | 33.30 | ₹127.91 | +0.80% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹321.65 | +0.74% | 670.6B | 58.16 | ₹5.53 | +0.85% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹321.65 | +0.77% | 670.6B | 58.27 | ₹5.52 | +0.85% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹94.62 | -0.74% | 255.5B | 39.10 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹94.54 | -0.84% | 255.3B | 39.07 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,205.40 | +1.55% | 205.8B | 24.63 | ₹48.94 | +0.75% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,205.00 | +1.43% | 205.8B | 24.62 | ₹48.95 | +0.75% |
| KEC.NS | ₹590.70 | +1.38% | 157.2B | 22.77 | ₹25.94 | +0.93% |
| KEC.BO | ₹590.40 | +1.23% | 157.2B | 22.77 | ₹25.93 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
LT.BO vs LT.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 5.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while LT.NS trades at ₹4,259.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RVNL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 670.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹321.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 58.16. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs RVNL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 670.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹321.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 58.27. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NBCC.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 255.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹94.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.10. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs NBCC.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 255.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹94.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 39.07. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,205.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,205.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KEC.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KEC.NS trades at ₹590.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KEC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KEC.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 157.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KEC.BO trades at ₹590.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KEC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs IRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹148.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs IRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 139.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹148.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 136.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,170.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,169.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.95. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 121.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹216.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹215.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs AFCONS.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹307.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.20. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RITES.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while RITES.BO trades at ₹216.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.26. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RITES.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs RITES.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 104.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while RITES.NS trades at ₹216.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RITES.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹591.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹590.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.31. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 101.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹591.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 101.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹590.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹986.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹986.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs NCC.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while NCC.BO trades at ₹149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs NCC.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while NCC.NS trades at ₹149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check NCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹561.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 75.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹561.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DBL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while DBL.BO trades at ₹446.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DBL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs DBL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while DBL.NS trades at ₹445.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DBL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹140.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 30.33. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 68.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹140.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs WELENT.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹500.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs WELENT.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹500.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,124.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 67.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,122.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 62.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,476.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 62.10. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 62.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,474.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 61.78. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO and AXISCADES.NS have similar daily volatility (4.88).Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹305.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 107.90. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 56.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹305.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 53.27. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹212.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹212.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹810.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹809.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹108.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹108.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹371.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.92. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹370.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.90. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs JKIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹548.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs JKIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹547.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.61. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹140.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹140.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs KNRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹135.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KNRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹135.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹569.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 9.47. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹569.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs BONDADA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹316.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs HCC.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while HCC.NS trades at ₹18.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HCC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs HCC.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while HCC.BO trades at ₹18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check HCC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GVPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹478.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GVPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹476.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.18. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs RAMKY.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹462.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs RAMKY.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹461.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,902.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹742.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 71.64. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹741.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 71.20. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs EIEL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹160.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs PATELENG.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.95. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs PATELENG.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹28.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹919.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -38.41. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹918.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -38.37. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GEPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GEPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹330.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹330.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹242.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹242.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs KPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹288.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹348.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹346.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 3.20. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs MBEL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹315.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹954.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 16.03. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GARUDA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹180.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹301.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹301.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 12.77. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GARUDA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹180.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹200.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹199.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹123.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹123.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹173.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.45. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹172.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs ABINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, ABINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while ABINFRA.NS trades at ₹20.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas ABINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to ABINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check ABINFRA.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs SEPC.BO Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SEPC.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SEPC.BO trades at ₹7.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.44. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEPC.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SEPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SEPC.BO's competition here
LT.BO vs SEPC.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, SEPC.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while SEPC.NS trades at ₹7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas SEPC.NS's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEPC.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is less volatile compared to SEPC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check SEPC.NS's competition here
LT.BO vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison February 2026
LT.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LT.BO stands at 5.9T. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LT.BO is priced at ₹4,258.50, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,057.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LT.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 33.29, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, LT.BO's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LT.BO is more volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LT.BO.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here