Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares
Lotus Technology Inc. American Depositary Shares LOT Peers
See (LOT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOT | $2.13 | -3.18% | 1.4B | -1.23 | -$1.72 | N/A |
| TSLA | $315.65 | +4.97% | 1T | 181.40 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $172.01 | +0.27% | 224.4B | 6.99 | $24.59 | +3.14% |
| RACE | $491.56 | +0.45% | 87.6B | 48.66 | $10.10 | +0.69% |
| GM | $52.68 | +1.25% | 50.6B | 7.35 | $7.16 | +0.97% |
| F | $11.77 | +3.75% | 46B | 9.42 | $1.25 | +6.38% |
| F-PB | $21.58 | +1.89% | 43.6B | N/A | N/A | +6.38% |
| F-PC | $21.39 | +2.15% | 42.7B | N/A | N/A | +6.38% |
| F-PD | $22.84 | +1.38% | 42.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.38% |
| STLA | $10.33 | +1.08% | 29.6B | 4.90 | $2.11 | +7.49% |
Stock Comparison
LOT vs TSLA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while TSLA trades at $315.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 181.40. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs TM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 224.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while TM trades at $172.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs RACE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while RACE trades at $491.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.66. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while GM trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.35. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while F trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F-PB Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while F-PB trades at $21.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F-PC Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while F-PC trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs F-PD Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 42.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while F-PD trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs STLA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while STLA trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs XPEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while XPEV trades at $18.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.51. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs RIVN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while RIVN trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.49. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs HMC Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while HMC trades at $29.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LI Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while LI trades at $26.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VFS Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while VFS trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs NIO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while NIO trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ZK Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ZK trades at $25.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.10. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LCID Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while LCID trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PSNY Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while PSNY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs BLBD Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while BLBD trades at $45.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 14.11. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LVWR Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 897.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while LVWR trades at $4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs NAKD Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VFSWW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 634.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while VFSWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PSNYW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 299.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while PSNYW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs NIU Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while NIU trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.98. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFAI Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while FFAI trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.25. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFIEW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFIE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LOTWW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs CJET Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while CJET trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FSR Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FLYE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while FLYE trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -13.23. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs CENN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while CENN trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SOLO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs RIDE Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs WKHS Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while WKHS trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ECDAW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GP Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while GP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ECDA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ECDA trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ARVL Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SVMH Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GOEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs AIEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while AIEV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs HYZN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs EVTV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while EVTV trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs LOBO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while LOBO trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs DMN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs AYRO Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while AYRO trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VLCN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while VLCN trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs FFAIW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs EGOX Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs VEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ZAPP Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs MULN Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 543.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while MULN trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs GOEVW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ELMS Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs PTRA Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SEV Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs ADOM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs TTM Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.
LOT vs SOLOW Comparison
LOT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOT stands at 1.4B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOT is priced at $2.13, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOT currently has a P/E ratio of -1.23, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOT's ROE is +3.21%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LOT is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOT.