Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima
Loma Negra Compañía Industrial Argentina Sociedad Anónima (LOMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LOMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LOMA | $9.98 | -3.39% | 1.2B | 167.00 | $0.06 | N/A |
| CRH | $102.24 | +2.52% | 66.8B | 18.11 | $5.51 | +1.51% |
| MLM | $587.66 | +0.05% | 35.2B | 35.79 | $16.31 | +0.56% |
| VMC | $266.89 | +1.17% | 35.1B | 32.54 | $8.16 | +0.75% |
| AMRZ | $55.60 | -1.24% | 30.7B | 25.96 | $2.14 | N/A |
| CX | $10.68 | +2.84% | 15.1B | 38.54 | $0.27 | +0.86% |
| JHX | $19.76 | +0.48% | 11.4B | 81.79 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| EXP | $187.32 | +0.48% | 6B | 14.09 | $13.23 | +0.54% |
| KNF | $79.77 | +1.94% | 4.4B | 28.41 | $2.76 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LOMA vs CRH Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while CRH trades at $102.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CRH's competition here
LOMA vs MLM Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while MLM trades at $587.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check MLM's competition here
LOMA vs VMC Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while VMC trades at $266.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check VMC's competition here
LOMA vs AMRZ Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while AMRZ trades at $55.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 25.96. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check AMRZ's competition here
LOMA vs CX Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while CX trades at $10.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 38.54. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CX's competition here
LOMA vs JHX Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while JHX trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 81.79. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check JHX's competition here
LOMA vs SUM Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check SUM's competition here
LOMA vs EXP Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EXP has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while EXP trades at $187.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas EXP's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXP's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to EXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check EXP's competition here
LOMA vs KNF Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while KNF trades at $79.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 28.41. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check KNF's competition here
LOMA vs USLM Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while USLM trades at $126.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check USLM's competition here
LOMA vs TTAM Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while TTAM trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check TTAM's competition here
LOMA vs BCC Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while BCC trades at $72.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check BCC's competition here
LOMA vs TGLS Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while TGLS trades at $43.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check TGLS's competition here
LOMA vs CPAC Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 858.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while CPAC trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 19.65. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CPAC's competition here
LOMA vs SMID Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 174.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while SMID trades at $33.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check SMID's competition here
LOMA vs FEAM Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 42.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while FEAM trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check FEAM's competition here
LOMA vs CAPS Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while CAPS trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check CAPS's competition here
LOMA vs RETO Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 326.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while RETO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check RETO's competition here
LOMA vs USCR Comparison March 2026
LOMA plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LOMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LOMA is priced at $9.98, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 167.00, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, LOMA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LOMA is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LOMA.Check USCR's competition here