Lennox International Inc.
Lennox International Inc. (LII) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LII) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LII | $478.86 | -0.44% | 16.8B | 21.01 | $22.80 | +1.05% |
| TT | $421.50 | -0.21% | 93.5B | 32.08 | $13.14 | +0.91% |
| JCI | $131.69 | +1.18% | 80.6B | 44.19 | $2.98 | +1.18% |
| CARR | $55.85 | +0.36% | 46.7B | 33.05 | $1.69 | +1.63% |
| CSL | $334.72 | -1.96% | 14B | 19.50 | $17.17 | +1.26% |
| MAS | $62.10 | +0.94% | 12.6B | 16.09 | $3.86 | +2.03% |
| WMS | $140.31 | +2.21% | 10.9B | 23.35 | $6.01 | +0.52% |
| BLDR | $87.02 | -1.21% | 9.6B | 22.38 | $3.89 | N/A |
| OC | $107.90 | +1.36% | 8.9B | -48.13 | -$2.24 | +2.78% |
| FBHS | $61.90 | -2.09% | 7.9B | 10.96 | $5.65 | +1.81% |
Stock Comparison
LII vs TT Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while TT trades at $421.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 32.08. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check TT's competition here
LII vs JCI Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 80.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while JCI trades at $131.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 44.19. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check JCI's competition here
LII vs CARR Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while CARR trades at $55.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 33.05. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check CARR's competition here
LII vs CSL Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while CSL trades at $334.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check CSL's competition here
LII vs MAS Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while MAS trades at $62.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check MAS's competition here
LII vs WMS Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while WMS trades at $140.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check WMS's competition here
LII vs BLDR Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while BLDR trades at $87.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check BLDR's competition here
LII vs OC Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while OC trades at $107.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -48.13. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check OC's competition here
LII vs FBHS Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check FBHS's competition here
LII vs AZEK Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AZEK's competition here
LII vs BECN Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check BECN's competition here
LII vs SSD Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while SSD trades at $178.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check SSD's competition here
LII vs AWI Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while AWI trades at $167.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AWI's competition here
LII vs AAON Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while AAON trades at $81.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 63.22. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AAON's competition here
LII vs FBIN Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while FBIN trades at $43.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check FBIN's competition here
LII vs GMS Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check GMS's competition here
LII vs TREX Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while TREX trades at $37.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check TREX's competition here
LII vs DOOR Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check DOOR's competition here
LII vs PGTI Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check PGTI's competition here
LII vs ROCK Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while ROCK trades at $41.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check ROCK's competition here
LII vs NX Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 793.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while NX trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check NX's competition here
LII vs JBI Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 740.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while JBI trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check JBI's competition here
LII vs SWIM Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 714.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while SWIM trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 68.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check SWIM's competition here
LII vs APOG Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 711.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while APOG trades at $33.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 17.68. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check APOG's competition here
LII vs BXC Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 399.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while BXC trades at $50.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 2537.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check BXC's competition here
LII vs PHOE Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 351.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while PHOE trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 325.60. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check PHOE's competition here
LII vs ASPN Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 279.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while ASPN trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check ASPN's competition here
LII vs PPIH Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 230.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while PPIH trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check PPIH's competition here
LII vs JELD Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while JELD trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check JELD's competition here
LII vs APT Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while APT trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check APT's competition here
LII vs SMJF Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while SMJF trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 93.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check SMJF's competition here
LII vs AIRJW Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 39.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while AIRJW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AIRJW's competition here
LII vs CSTE Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while CSTE trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check CSTE's competition here
LII vs ILAG Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while ILAG trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check ILAG's competition here
LII vs VIEW Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check VIEW's competition here
LII vs AEHL Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while AEHL trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AEHL's competition here
LII vs VIEWW Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check VIEWW's competition here
LII vs AFI Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check AFI's competition here
LII vs FRTA Comparison March 2026
LII plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LII stands at 16.8B. In comparison, FRTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LII is priced at $478.86, while FRTA trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LII currently has a P/E ratio of 21.01, whereas FRTA's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, LII's ROE is +0.79%, compared to FRTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LII is more volatile compared to FRTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LII.Check FRTA's competition here