Li Auto Inc.
Li Auto Inc. LI Peers
See (LI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LI | $29.59 | -2.73% | 29.9B | 27.92 | $1.06 | N/A |
| TSLA | $305.30 | -8.20% | 982B | 173.46 | $1.76 | N/A |
| TM | $191.66 | -0.79% | 250.9B | 7.91 | $24.22 | +2.81% |
| RACE | $516.20 | -0.26% | 92B | 50.25 | $10.27 | +0.66% |
| GM | $52.34 | -1.49% | 49.9B | 7.99 | $6.55 | +0.97% |
| F-PB | $22.06 | +0.18% | 45.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.64% |
| F-PD | $23.42 | +0.00% | 45.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.64% |
| F-PC | $21.67 | -0.23% | 44.4B | N/A | N/A | +6.64% |
| F | $11.26 | -1.05% | 44B | 9.01 | $1.25 | +6.64% |
| STLA | $9.58 | -7.35% | 27.5B | -10.09 | -$0.95 | +8.03% |
Stock Comparison
LI vs TSLA Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 982B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while TSLA trades at $305.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 173.46. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs TM Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 250.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while TM trades at $191.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs RACE Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while RACE trades at $516.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 50.25. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs GM Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while GM trades at $52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 7.99. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs F-PB Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while F-PB trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs F-PD Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while F-PD trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs F-PC Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while F-PC trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs F Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while F trades at $11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas F's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs STLA Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while STLA trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -10.09. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs XPEV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while XPEV trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -25.53. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs HMC Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while HMC trades at $33.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 9.28. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs RIVN Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while RIVN trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs NIO Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while NIO trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs LCID Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while LCID trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs VFS Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while VFS trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ZK Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ZK trades at $29.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -10.48. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs PSNY Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while PSNY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs LOT Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while LOT trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs BLBD Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while BLBD trades at $45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs LVWR Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 905.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while LVWR trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs NAKD Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs VFSWW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 664.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while VFSWW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs PSNYW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 326.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while PSNYW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs FFAI Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while FFAI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.46. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs NIU Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 291.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while NIU trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -12.05. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs FFIEW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs FFIE Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs FLYE Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 95.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while FLYE trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs LOTWW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 81.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while LOTWW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs CJET Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while CJET trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs FSR Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs CENN Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 30.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while CENN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs SOLO Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs RIDE Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs WKHS Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while WKHS trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs SVMH Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ECDAW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs GP Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while GP trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ECDA Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ECDA trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs PEV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ARVL Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs VLCN Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while VLCN trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs MULN Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while MULN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs GOEV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs LOBO Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while LOBO trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs HYZN Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs EVTV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while EVTV trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs FFAIW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while FFAIW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs AIEV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while AIEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs DMN Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs AYRO Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while AYRO trades at $7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs VEV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ZAPP Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs GOEVW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs EGOX Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 341.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ADOM Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs TTM Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs PTRA Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs SEV Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs ELMS Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.
LI vs SOLOW Comparison
LI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LI stands at 29.9B. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LI is priced at $29.59, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LI currently has a P/E ratio of 27.92, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LI's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, LI is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LI.