Lifeward Ltd.

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 200.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ABT trades at $112.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ABT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BSX-PA's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SYK trades at $372.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 45.94. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SYK's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while MDT trades at $97.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check MDT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 110.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BSX trades at $75.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BSX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while EW trades at $78.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 45.57. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to EW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check EW's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BRKRP has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BRKRP trades at $305.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BRKRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BRKRP's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BRKRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BRKRP's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PHG trades at $30.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PHG's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while DXCM trades at $72.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check DXCM's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while STE trades at $251.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check STE's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ZBH trades at $99.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 28.02. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ZBH's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PODD trades at $249.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 72.71. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PODD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ABMD trades at $381.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ABMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SNN trades at $35.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 32.31. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SNN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PEN trades at $340.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 81.33. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PEN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ALGN trades at $189.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ALGN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SWAV trades at $334.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SWAV's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while GMED trades at $90.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check GMED's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BIO-B trades at $261.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BIO-B's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BIO trades at $271.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BIO's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while GKOS trades at $117.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -80.82. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check GKOS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BRKR trades at $38.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is -263.73. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BRKR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BRKR's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while NARI trades at $79.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check NARI's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while TMDX trades at $132.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 53.01. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check TMDX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while IRTC trades at $158.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -87.17. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check IRTC's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while LIVN trades at $67.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is -17.17. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to LIVN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check LIVN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while AXNX trades at $70.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check AXNX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ITGR trades at $83.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 35.32. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ITGR's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ESTA trades at $75.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -26.39. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ESTA's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while NUVA trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check NUVA's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ATEC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -12.65. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -103.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ATEC's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while TNDM trades at $18.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check TNDM's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PMI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PMI trades at $1.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PMI's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PMI's ROE of +1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to PMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PMI's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while UFPT trades at $222.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check UFPT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while AORT trades at $38.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is 178.12. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to AORT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check AORT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while AXGN trades at $35.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -707.60. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check AXGN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while INSP trades at $59.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check INSP's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PRCT trades at $26.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PRCT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, LMRI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while LMRI trades at $14.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas LMRI's P/E ratio is -32.83. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to LMRI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to LMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check LMRI's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CNMD trades at $44.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CNMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while AHCO trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to AHCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check AHCO's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while HSKA trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check HSKA's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while IRMD trades at $100.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check IRMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SILK trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SILK's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while FNA trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check FNA's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 937.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SSII trades at $4.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -80.67. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SSII's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 916M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while IART trades at $12.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check IART's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 899.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while INMD trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check INMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CSII trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CSII's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 742.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BFLY trades at $3.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -8.91. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BFLY's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 741.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CBLL trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -5.45. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CBLL's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CRY trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CRY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CRY's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 707.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while AVNS trades at $15.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -1.50. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check AVNS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 677.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SIBN trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -30.63. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SIBN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 640.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while TCMD trades at $28.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check TCMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SRDX trades at $42.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -34.66. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SRDX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 580M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BVS trades at $8.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 54.13. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BVS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BVS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while APEN trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check APEN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 561.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CTKB trades at $4.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -39.91. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CTKB's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 557.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while VREX trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check VREX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 538.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while OFIX trades at $13.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -4.49. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check OFIX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ZIMV trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ZIMV's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 487.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BWAY trades at $23.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 83.17. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BWAY's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 485M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while NPCE trades at $14.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -19.41. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check NPCE's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 477M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PACB trades at $1.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PACB's ROE of -11.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PACB's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 457.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CERS trades at $2.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -29.75. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CERS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CLPT trades at $14.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -17.78. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CLPT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 426.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while LAB trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check LAB's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CATX trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CATX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 408.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while KIDS trades at $17.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check KIDS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 363.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while RXST trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check RXST's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, DCTH has a market cap of 338M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while DCTH trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas DCTH's P/E ratio is 324.67. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to DCTH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to DCTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check DCTH's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 334.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SENS trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -5.32. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SENS's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SENS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 321.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while VMD trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check VMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SMLR trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SMLR's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 283.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SGHT trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SGHT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while QTRX trades at $5.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check QTRX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while MGRM trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check MGRM's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 234.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while MASS trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check MASS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while NVRO trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check NVRO's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 215.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while PROF trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -5.42. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check PROF's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while EYES trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to EYES's ROE of -4.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check EYES's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 205.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while SNWV trades at $24.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is -32.82. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to SNWV's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check SNWV's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 204.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ELMD trades at $24.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ELMD's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 202.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while AVR trades at $5.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to AVR's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check AVR's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while BSGM trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +17.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check BSGM's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, MDGS has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while MDGS trades at $2.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas MDGS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to MDGS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to MDGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check MDGS's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while CVRX trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check CVRX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, RPID has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while RPID trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas RPID's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to RPID's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to RPID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check RPID's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, OWLT has a market cap of 176.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while OWLT trades at $11.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas OWLT's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to OWLT's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to OWLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check OWLT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, EDAP has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while EDAP trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas EDAP's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to EDAP's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to EDAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check EDAP's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while TLSI trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check TLSI's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 160.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while QIPT trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check QIPT's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while ANIK trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -11.03. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check ANIK's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while INGN trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check INGN's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, QTI has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while QTI trades at $5.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas QTI's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to QTI's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to QTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check QTI's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while NNOX trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is more volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check NNOX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, APYX has a market cap of 146.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while APYX trades at $3.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas APYX's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to APYX's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to APYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check APYX's competition here

LFWD plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, LFWD stands at 7M. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 145.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LFWD is priced at $0.52, while LUCD trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

LFWD currently has a P/E ratio of -0.13, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, LFWD's ROE is -1.83%, compared to LUCD's ROE of -6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LFWD is less volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LFWD.Check LUCD's competition here