Karat Packaging Inc.

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while SW trades at $49.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SW's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while IP trades at $46.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas IP's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to IP's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check IP's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while AMCR trades at $49.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMCR's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BLL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while PKG trades at $238.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PKG's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while BALL trades at $66.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BALL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check WRK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while CCK trades at $113.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check CCK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check BERY's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while SEE trades at $41.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SEE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while SON trades at $56.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SON's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while SLGN trades at $47.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check SLGN's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while REYN trades at $24.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check REYN's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while GEF-B trades at $87.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF-B's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while GPK trades at $12.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GPK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while GEF trades at $74.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check GEF's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PTVE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while AMBP trades at $4.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -471.00. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check AMBP's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while OI trades at $15.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -18.30. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OI's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while TRS trades at $38.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TRS's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 845M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while MYE trades at $22.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MYE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check FFHL's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 464.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while PACK trades at $5.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check PACK's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while OCTO trades at $8.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check OCTO's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TUP's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while MGIH trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check MGIH's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while DSS trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check DSS's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while YHGJ trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check YHGJ's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check TYDE's competition here

KRT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, KRT stands at 507.9M. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KRT is priced at $25.70, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

KRT currently has a P/E ratio of 16.85, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KRT's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRT is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRT.Check ARD's competition here