ITL Industries Limited
ITL Industries Limited (ITL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ITL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITL.BO | ₹306.05 | -0.02% | 971.7M | 9.55 | ₹31.74 | +0.33% |
| ABB.BO | ₹7,059.70 | +2.80% | 1.5T | 82.60 | ₹83.38 | +0.64% |
| ABB.NS | ₹7,068.50 | +2.84% | 1.5T | 87.45 | ₹78.71 | +0.64% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,153.45 | +2.98% | 1.4T | 62.27 | ₹81.08 | +1.06% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹5,162.10 | +3.17% | 1.4T | 62.45 | ₹80.68 | +1.06% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,715.20 | +3.87% | 1.3T | 75.25 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,711.00 | +3.77% | 1.3T | 75.12 | ₹47.44 | N/A |
| BHEL.NS | ₹313.75 | +7.26% | 1.1T | 132.73 | ₹2.33 | +0.16% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹313.40 | +7.16% | 1.1T | 132.64 | ₹2.33 | +0.16% |
| VOLTAS.BO | ₹1,424.00 | +1.54% | 466.2B | 92.70 | ₹15.20 | +0.50% |
Stock Comparison
ITL.BO vs ABB.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ABB.BO trades at ₹7,059.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 82.60. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ABB.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ABB.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ABB.NS trades at ₹7,068.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 87.45. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ABB.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,153.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 62.27. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹5,162.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 62.45. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,715.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 75.25. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,711.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 75.12. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs BHEL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹313.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 132.73. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs BHEL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹313.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 132.64. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 466.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,424.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 92.70. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 466.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,426.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 93.24. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs THERMAX.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 464.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹4,137.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 68.24. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs THERMAX.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 464.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹4,139.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 68.22. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs GET&D.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 380.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,844.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 76.89. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs AIAENG.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 366.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,953.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs AIAENG.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 366.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,945.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.49. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KAYNES.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 281.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹4,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 70.88. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KAYNES.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 281.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹4,196.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SCHNEIDER.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 238.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹1,020.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 97.87. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 235B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,590.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 234.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,586.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 171B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹547.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.35. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 170.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹548.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KSB.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 163.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KSB.NS trades at ₹963.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 60.61. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KSB.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs KSB.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KSB.BO trades at ₹964.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 60.21. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KSB.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 159.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹702.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.65. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 151.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹513.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 44.34. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 151.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹510.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 151.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹1,002.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 68.90. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 151.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹1,003.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 69.29. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 148.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹4,785.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 233.39. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 148.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹4,794.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 233.20. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs LMW.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LMW.NS trades at ₹14,249.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 128.79. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LMW.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs LMW.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 147.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LMW.BO trades at ₹14,265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 128.27. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LMW.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 138.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,760.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 137.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,767.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.61. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 136B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,495.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 54.92. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs TEGA.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 131.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,742.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.35. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs TEGA.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 131.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,739.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.21. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,093.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 49.82. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,098.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.79. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs AZAD.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,860.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 97.20. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹501.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 38.37. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 101.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹501.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ELECON.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 91.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹409.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ELECON.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 91.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 42.66. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,260.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs DIACABS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹149.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 74.51. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs DIACABS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹149.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 71.92. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ISGEC.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 76.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹1,042.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ISGEC.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹1,042.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹569.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 65.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹572.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹56.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 45.14. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 64B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹56.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 45.14. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs BALUFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 55.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹482.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.81. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs LSIL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹106.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹106.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹923.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 233.13. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹922.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 234.25. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ANUP.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹2,070.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 35.73. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ANUP.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹2,070.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.75. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs WPIL.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹430.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹160.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹160.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.16. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹476.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 44.47. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹475.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SGLTL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs SETL.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while SETL.NS trades at ₹137.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.74. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check SETL.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹501.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.74. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs JASH.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while JASH.NS trades at ₹399.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 45.33. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check JASH.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹284.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -920.94. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹283.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -919.52. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs PENIND.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹175.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs PENIND.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹174.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 17.55. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,286.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,294.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs GMM.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check GMM.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹333.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 33.53. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹333.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs KMEW.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,812.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 65.37. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,942.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 45.73. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,522.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,527.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.99. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs THEJO.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,819.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs DISAQ.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹12,550.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs ADOR.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,010.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ADOR.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,006.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹307.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 36.70. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs JYOTISTRUC.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹13.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.18. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here
ITL.BO vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
ITL.BO vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison April 2026
ITL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ITL.BO stands at 971.7M. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ITL.BO is priced at ₹306.05, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ITL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 9.55, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, ITL.BO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ITL.BO is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ITL.BO.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here