Ircon International Limited
Ircon International Limited (IRCON.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IRCON.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRCON.NS | ₹118.62 | -4.09% | 108.4B | 17.65 | ₹6.53 | +1.91% |
| LT.NS | ₹3,516.80 | +2.39% | 4.6T | 26.16 | ₹127.77 | +1.02% |
| LT.BO | ₹3,515.35 | +2.35% | 4.6T | 26.13 | ₹127.91 | +1.02% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹258.40 | -2.32% | 521.8B | 45.50 | ₹5.50 | +1.09% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹258.45 | -1.49% | 521.8B | 45.50 | ₹5.50 | +1.09% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹81.87 | -2.43% | 213.6B | 32.69 | ₹2.42 | +0.86% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹81.85 | -1.55% | 213.5B | 32.68 | ₹2.42 | +0.86% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,050.85 | -2.00% | 174B | 20.83 | ₹48.90 | +0.88% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,051.80 | -1.79% | 173.9B | 20.80 | ₹48.94 | +0.88% |
| KEC.NS | ₹545.50 | -0.11% | 137.1B | 19.85 | ₹25.94 | +1.07% |
Stock Comparison
IRCON.NS vs LT.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while LT.NS trades at ₹3,516.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check LT.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs LT.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while LT.BO trades at ₹3,515.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 26.13. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 521.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹258.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 521.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹258.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 213.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹81.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 213.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹81.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,050.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.83. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 173.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,051.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.80. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 137.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KEC.NS trades at ₹545.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KEC.BO trades at ₹546.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,050.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,049.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 25.15. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹118.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹187.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 101.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹187.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 99.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹277.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while RITES.BO trades at ₹188.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 88.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while RITES.NS trades at ₹188.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹538.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹538.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 21.37. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹538.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹538.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while NCC.BO trades at ₹136.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 83.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while NCC.NS trades at ₹136.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 81.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹822.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 81.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹821.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹498.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 65.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹498.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while DBL.NS trades at ₹395.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 63.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while DBL.BO trades at ₹399.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 59.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹444.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹443.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹1,879.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹1,880.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,415.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 57.30. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,420.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 57.21. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹312.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 54.50. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹312.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 109.82. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹109.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 23.15. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹109.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 23.14. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 45.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹265.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 45.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹685.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹685.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹173.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹174.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹338.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹336.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 36.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹473.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹469.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹86.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹86.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹112.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹112.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹449.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹449.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹474.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹474.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹110.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹110.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.05. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹254.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,711.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹407.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹409.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs HCC.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HCC.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while HCC.NS trades at ₹14.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HCC.NS's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check HCC.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while HCC.BO trades at ₹14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 20.39. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹145.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.87. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹617.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 58.72. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹616.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 58.51. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹859.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -34.46. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹859.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -34.44. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹24.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹264.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹268.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹273.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹211.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹211.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 8.84. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹318.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹318.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 2.61. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹898.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹283.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹283.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 11.84. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹249.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹151.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹151.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹103.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹103.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.06. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹154.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,017.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,020.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.52. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹152.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹158.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹157.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 21.04. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
IRCON.NS vs CFF.BO Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, CFF.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while CFF.BO trades at ₹564.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas CFF.BO's P/E ratio is 37.79. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CFF.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is less volatile compared to CFF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check CFF.BO's competition here
IRCON.NS vs ABINFRA.NS Comparison March 2026
IRCON.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IRCON.NS stands at 108.4B. In comparison, ABINFRA.NS has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IRCON.NS is priced at ₹118.62, while ABINFRA.NS trades at ₹16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IRCON.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.65, whereas ABINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 45.73. In terms of profitability, IRCON.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IRCON.NS is more volatile compared to ABINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IRCON.NS.Check ABINFRA.NS's competition here