International Paper Company

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, DSSMY has a market cap of 41.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while DSSMY trades at $30.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas DSSMY's P/E ratio is 37.04. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSSMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to DSSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, NPKLY has a market cap of 34.69B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while NPKLY trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas NPKLY's P/E ratio is -2100.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPKLY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to NPKLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SMFTF has a market cap of 25.50B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SMFTF trades at $49.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SMFTF's P/E ratio is 15.54. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMFTF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SMFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SMFKY has a market cap of 24.77B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SMFKY trades at $45.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SMFKY's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMFKY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SMFKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, INPAP has a market cap of 23.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while INPAP trades at $68.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas INPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INPAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to INPAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, AMCCF has a market cap of 22.84B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while AMCCF trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas AMCCF's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMCCF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to AMCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21.87B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SW trades at $41.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 51.10. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while BLL trades at $69.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BLL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 21.05B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while AMCR trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 16.31B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while PKG trades at $181.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while BALL trades at $52.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 29.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while WRK trades at $51.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.29B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while CCK trades at $97.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 20.91. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, DITHF has a market cap of 9.99B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while DITHF trades at $7.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas DITHF's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DITHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to DITHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, CCDBF has a market cap of 9.78B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while CCDBF trades at $55.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas CCDBF's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCDBF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CCDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, CCLLF has a market cap of 9.21B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while CCLLF trades at $52.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas CCLLF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CCLLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CCLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SIGCY has a market cap of 7.90B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SIGCY trades at $20.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SIGCY's P/E ratio is 38.82. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIGCY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SIGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while BERY trades at $67.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SCBGF has a market cap of 7.82B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SCBGF trades at $20.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SCBGF's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCBGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SCBGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 6.73B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while GPK trades at $22.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SLGN trades at $49.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while REYN trades at $23.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.49B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SEE trades at $30.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SON trades at $44.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 54.11. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, HOYFF has a market cap of 3.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while HOYFF trades at $35.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas HOYFF's P/E ratio is 13.46. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HOYFF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to HOYFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, VDRFF has a market cap of 3.61B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while VDRFF trades at $107.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas VDRFF's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VDRFF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to VDRFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while PTVE trades at $18.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while GEF trades at $54.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 2.68B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while GEF-B trades at $59.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.24B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while AMBP trades at $3.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -93.50. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.08B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while OI trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -10.75. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP and OI have similar daily volatility (2.26).

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, WIPKF has a market cap of 1.91B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while WIPKF trades at $30.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas WIPKF's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WIPKF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to WIPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, ORRYY has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while ORRYY trades at $9.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas ORRYY's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORRYY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to ORRYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, ORRAF has a market cap of 1.44B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while ORRAF trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas ORRAF's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ORRAF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to ORRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, MNHFF has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while MNHFF trades at $72.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas MNHFF's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MNHFF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to MNHFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 984.18M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while TRS trades at $24.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, FRFTF has a market cap of 926.58M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while FRFTF trades at $42.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas FRFTF's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FRFTF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to FRFTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, FUJSF has a market cap of 766.96M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while FUJSF trades at $14.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas FUJSF's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUJSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to FUJSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, ELPKF has a market cap of 755.87M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while ELPKF trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas ELPKF's P/E ratio is 9.69. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELPKF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to ELPKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, PCTGY has a market cap of 731.04M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while PCTGY trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas PCTGY's P/E ratio is 57.91. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCTGY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PCTGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.42M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while FFHL trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -79.62%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, CADNF has a market cap of 611.01M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while CADNF trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas CADNF's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CADNF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CADNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 606.30M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while KRT trades at $30.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 455.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while MYE trades at $12.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 43.56. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, HXGCF has a market cap of 402.57M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while HXGCF trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas HXGCF's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HXGCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to HXGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, GRVWF has a market cap of 398.36M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while GRVWF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas GRVWF's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRVWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GRVWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, JSPCF has a market cap of 385.77M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while JSPCF trades at $14.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas JSPCF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JSPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to JSPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 284.71M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while PACK trades at $3.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SNGSF has a market cap of 162.70M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SNGSF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SNGSF's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SNGSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to SNGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, VKSC has a market cap of 99.06M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while VKSC trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas VKSC's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VKSC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to VKSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SUMXF has a market cap of 66.31M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SUMXF trades at $2.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SUMXF's P/E ratio is -7.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUMXF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SUMXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, IFLXF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while IFLXF trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas IFLXF's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IFLXF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to IFLXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 27.19M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while YHGJ trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while TUP trades at $0.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 18.79M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while MGIH trades at $1.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, YIKWF has a market cap of 17.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while YIKWF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas YIKWF's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YIKWF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to YIKWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SPQDF has a market cap of 15.22M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SPQDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SPQDF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPQDF's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to SPQDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, NEXNF has a market cap of 14.79M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while NEXNF trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas NEXNF's P/E ratio is -7.60. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEXNF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to NEXNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.37M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while DSS trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, IDND has a market cap of 7.90M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while IDND trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas IDND's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IDND's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to IDND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 3.97M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while OCTO trades at $1.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCTO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while TYDE trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYDE's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, MAYX has a market cap of 2.99M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while MAYX trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas MAYX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MAYX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MAYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, RDVA has a market cap of 1.60M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while RDVA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas RDVA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RDVA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to RDVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, SINC has a market cap of 1.44M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while SINC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas SINC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SINC's ROE of +6.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to SINC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, GDNPF has a market cap of 975977.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while GDNPF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas GDNPF's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GDNPF's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GDNPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, EPTI has a market cap of 134874.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while EPTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas EPTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EPTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to EPTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, TZPC has a market cap of 77675.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while TZPC trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas TZPC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TZPC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to TZPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, ACGX has a market cap of 44327.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while ACGX trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas ACGX's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACGX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to ACGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, PGOG has a market cap of 6511.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while PGOG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas PGOG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PGOG's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to PGOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, ACTX has a market cap of 5190.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while ACTX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas ACTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACTX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to ACTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, GPRC has a market cap of 10.00. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while GPRC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas GPRC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GPRC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GPRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.

IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 23.36B. In comparison, ARD comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $44.26, while ARD trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

IP currently has a P/E ratio of 37.83, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.