International Paper Company
International Paper Company (IP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | $46.86 | +0.00% | 24.8B | -8.36 | -$5.61 | +3.95% |
| SW | $49.78 | +0.00% | 25.5B | 33.38 | $1.46 | +3.59% |
| AMCR | $49.53 | +0.00% | 23.3B | 37.97 | $1.33 | +5.10% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| PKG | $238.95 | +0.00% | 21.3B | 27.65 | $8.58 | +2.11% |
| BALL | $66.03 | +0.00% | 17.8B | 20.15 | $3.30 | +1.21% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $113.70 | +0.00% | 13.2B | 17.99 | $6.38 | +0.91% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +0.46% |
| SEE | $41.92 | +0.01% | 6.2B | 15.59 | $2.69 | +1.91% |
Stock Comparison
IP vs SW Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while SW trades at $49.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 33.38. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SW's competition here
IP vs AMCR Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while AMCR trades at $49.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 37.97. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AMCR's competition here
IP vs BLL Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BLL's competition here
IP vs PKG Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while PKG trades at $238.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 27.65. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PKG's competition here
IP vs BALL Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while BALL trades at $66.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BALL's competition here
IP vs WRK Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check WRK's competition here
IP vs CCK Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while CCK trades at $113.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check CCK's competition here
IP vs BERY Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BERY's competition here
IP vs SEE Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while SEE trades at $41.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SEE's competition here
IP vs SON Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while SON trades at $56.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SON's competition here
IP vs SLGN Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while SLGN trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 17.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SLGN's competition here
IP vs REYN Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while REYN trades at $24.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check REYN's competition here
IP vs GEF-B Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while GEF-B trades at $87.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 24.45. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GEF-B's competition here
IP vs GPK Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while GPK trades at $12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GPK's competition here
IP vs GEF Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while GEF trades at $74.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 30.87. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GEF's competition here
IP vs PTVE Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PTVE's competition here
IP vs AMBP Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while AMBP trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -471.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AMBP's competition here
IP vs OI Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while OI trades at $15.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -18.30. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check OI's competition here
IP vs TRS Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while TRS trades at $38.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 34.33. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TRS's competition here
IP vs MYE Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 845M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while MYE trades at $22.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 30.53. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check MYE's competition here
IP vs FFHL Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check FFHL's competition here
IP vs KRT Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 507.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while KRT trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check KRT's competition here
IP vs PACK Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 464.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while PACK trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PACK's competition here
IP vs OCTO Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check OCTO's competition here
IP vs TUP Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TUP's competition here
IP vs MGIH Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while MGIH trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check MGIH's competition here
IP vs DSS Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while DSS trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check DSS's competition here
IP vs YHGJ Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while YHGJ trades at $2.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check YHGJ's competition here
IP vs TYDE Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TYDE's competition here
IP vs ARD Comparison February 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 24.8B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $46.86, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -8.36, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check ARD's competition here