International Paper Company
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for IP
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for IP
International Paper Company (IP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IP | $34.93 | +0.40% | 18.5B | -6.23 | -$5.61 | +5.32% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.8B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.08% |
| SW | $40.11 | +2.09% | 21B | 30.16 | $1.33 | +4.44% |
| AMCR | $39.81 | -0.30% | 18.4B | 29.94 | $1.33 | +6.45% |
| PKG | $205.40 | +0.46% | 18.3B | 23.94 | $8.58 | +2.45% |
| BALL | $59.73 | -0.40% | 15.9B | 18.11 | $3.30 | +1.33% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.3B | 42.57 | $1.21 | +2.30% |
| CCK | $103.22 | +0.45% | 11.7B | 16.18 | $6.38 | +1.10% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.8B | 14.95 | $4.52 | N/A |
| SEE | $42.10 | +0.05% | 6.2B | 14.08 | $2.99 | +1.90% |
Stock Comparison
IP vs BLL Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BLL's competition here
IP vs SW Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while SW trades at $40.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SW's competition here
IP vs AMCR Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while AMCR trades at $39.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AMCR's competition here
IP vs PKG Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while PKG trades at $205.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PKG's competition here
IP vs BALL Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while BALL trades at $59.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BALL's competition here
IP vs WRK Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to WRK's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check WRK's competition here
IP vs CCK Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while CCK trades at $103.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check CCK's competition here
IP vs BERY Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check BERY's competition here
IP vs SEE Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while SEE trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SEE's competition here
IP vs SON Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while SON trades at $54.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 9.14. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SON's competition here
IP vs REYN Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while REYN trades at $21.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check REYN's competition here
IP vs SLGN Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while SLGN trades at $39.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check SLGN's competition here
IP vs GEF-B Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while GEF-B trades at $88.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GEF-B's competition here
IP vs PTVE Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PTVE's competition here
IP vs GEF Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while GEF trades at $66.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GEF's competition here
IP vs GPK Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while GPK trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check GPK's competition here
IP vs AMBP Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while AMBP trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -201.50. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check AMBP's competition here
IP vs OI Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while OI trades at $10.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -12.24. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check OI's competition here
IP vs TRS Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while TRS trades at $35.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 19.92. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TRS's competition here
IP vs MYE Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 788.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while MYE trades at $21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 22.66. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check MYE's competition here
IP vs FFHL Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, FFHL has a market cap of 695.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while FFHL trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas FFHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to FFHL's ROE of -46.33%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to FFHL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check FFHL's competition here
IP vs KRT Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 565M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while KRT trades at $28.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check KRT's competition here
IP vs PACK Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 300.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while PACK trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -7.88. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check PACK's competition here
IP vs OCTO Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 25.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while OCTO trades at $8.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check OCTO's competition here
IP vs TUP Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TUP's competition here
IP vs MGIH Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while MGIH trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check MGIH's competition here
IP vs DSS Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 7.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while DSS trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to DSS's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check DSS's competition here
IP vs YHGJ Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while YHGJ trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check YHGJ's competition here
IP vs TYDE Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check TYDE's competition here
IP vs ARD Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, ARD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while ARD trades at $24.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas ARD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to ARD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IP is less volatile compared to ARD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IP.Check ARD's competition here
IP vs UNFL Comparison April 2026
IP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IP stands at 18.5B. In comparison, UNFL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IP is priced at $34.93, while UNFL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IP currently has a P/E ratio of -6.23, whereas UNFL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IP's ROE is -0.20%, compared to UNFL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. IP has daily volatility of 2.69 and UNFL has daily volatility of N/A.Check UNFL's competition here