Imperial Oil Limited
Imperial Oil Limited IMO Peers
See (IMO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Integrated Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMO | $72.94 | +0.97% | 37.1B | 10.74 | $6.79 | +2.58% |
| XOM | $101.88 | -0.41% | 439.1B | 13.51 | $7.54 | +3.84% |
| CVX | $136.95 | -0.31% | 239.2B | 15.65 | $8.75 | +4.87% |
| SHEL | $67.53 | +0.39% | 201.4B | 15.42 | $4.38 | +4.16% |
| TTE | $59.18 | +0.22% | 131.4B | 9.91 | $5.97 | +5.73% |
| BP | $29.07 | +0.50% | 75.6B | -70.89 | -$0.41 | +6.53% |
| PBR-A | $10.49 | +1.16% | 71.7B | 7.83 | $1.34 | +21.76% |
| EQNR | $24.23 | +0.83% | 66.3B | 7.67 | $3.16 | +9.74% |
| E | $30.32 | +0.73% | 46.3B | 17.43 | $1.74 | +7.56% |
| SU | $36.63 | +0.83% | 45B | 10.44 | $3.51 | +4.39% |
Stock Comparison
IMO vs XOM Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 439.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while XOM trades at $101.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs CVX Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 239.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while CVX trades at $136.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 15.65. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs SHEL Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 201.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while SHEL trades at $67.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs TTE Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while TTE trades at $59.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs BP Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while BP trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BP's P/E ratio is -70.89. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to BP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs PBR-A Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 71.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while PBR-A trades at $10.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs EQNR Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while EQNR trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs E Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 46.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while E trades at $30.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas E's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs SU Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while SU trades at $36.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs PBR Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while PBR trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs CVE Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while CVE trades at $13.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs EC Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, EC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while EC trades at $8.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas EC's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to EC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to EC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs YPF Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while YPF trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to YPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs NFG Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while NFG trades at $81.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 177.47. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs TGS Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while TGS trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs TANNZ Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +208.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs SLNG Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while SLNG trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is 67.25. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SLNG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs CGBS Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while CGBS trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs SKYQ Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while SKYQ trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs ZEST Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while ZEST trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs RDS-A Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs RDS-B Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs PTR Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while PTR trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs TELZ Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while TELZ trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.
IMO vs SNP Comparison
IMO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IMO stands at 37.1B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IMO is priced at $72.94, while SNP trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IMO currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IMO's ROE is +0.20%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, IMO is less volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IMO.