Huron Consulting Group Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HURN
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HURN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HURN | $130.00 | -1.23% | 2.2B | 22.22 | $5.85 | N/A |
| VRSK | $175.43 | -3.08% | 24.5B | 27.07 | $6.48 | +1.05% |
| EFX | $184.38 | +1.40% | 22.2B | 34.59 | $5.33 | +1.12% |
| TRU | $71.20 | +3.50% | 13.7B | 30.70 | $2.32 | +0.66% |
| BAH | $81.60 | -2.95% | 10.1B | 12.06 | $6.77 | +2.71% |
| FCN | $181.23 | -1.78% | 5.6B | 22.02 | $8.23 | N/A |
| EXPO | $66.75 | +1.44% | 3.3B | 32.25 | $2.07 | +1.82% |
| ICFI | $69.20 | +2.41% | 1.3B | 13.98 | $4.95 | +0.82% |
| CRAI | $166.87 | +1.71% | 1.1B | 20.50 | $8.14 | +1.27% |
| SBC | $4.34 | -2.91% | 445.2M | 8.68 | $0.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HURN vs VRSK Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while VRSK trades at $175.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.07. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VRSK's competition here
HURN vs EFX Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while EFX trades at $184.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EFX's competition here
HURN vs TRU Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while TRU trades at $71.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 30.70. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check TRU's competition here
HURN vs BAH Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while BAH trades at $81.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check BAH's competition here
HURN vs FCN Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while FCN trades at $181.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 22.02. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FCN's competition here
HURN vs EXPO Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while EXPO trades at $66.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EXPO's competition here
HURN vs ICFI Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while ICFI trades at $69.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ICFI's competition here
HURN vs CRAI Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while CRAI trades at $166.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check CRAI's competition here
HURN vs SBC Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 445.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while SBC trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBC's competition here
HURN vs ROMA Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 282.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while ROMA trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -39.50. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ROMA's competition here
HURN vs FC Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 261.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while FC trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -99.11. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FC's competition here
HURN vs EGG Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 180.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while EGG trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 323.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EGG's competition here
HURN vs RGP Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 117.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while RGP trades at $3.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RGP's competition here
HURN vs FORR Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 102M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while FORR trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FORR's competition here
HURN vs SDH Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SDH's competition here
HURN vs SBCWW Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while SBCWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBCWW's competition here
HURN vs AERT Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while AERT trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -6.36. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERT's competition here
HURN vs RYOJ Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while RYOJ trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 214.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RYOJ's competition here
HURN vs GRNQ Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while GRNQ trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check GRNQ's competition here
HURN vs EPOW Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 21.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while EPOW trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EPOW's competition here
HURN vs AERTW Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERTW's competition here
HURN vs INTJ Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 258.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while INTJ trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check INTJ's competition here
HURN vs VCIG Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 132K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while VCIG trades at $1.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VCIG's competition here
HURN vs FGO Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HURN has daily volatility of 4.29 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
HURN vs NLSN Comparison April 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $130.00, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.22, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check NLSN's competition here