Huron Consulting Group Inc.
Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HURN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HURN | $126.88 | +0.13% | 2.2B | 21.73 | $5.84 | N/A |
| VRSK | $203.79 | -0.46% | 28.4B | 30.92 | $6.59 | +0.90% |
| EFX | $187.32 | +1.16% | 22.9B | 35.14 | $5.33 | +1.09% |
| TRU | $73.66 | +4.17% | 14.3B | 31.76 | $2.32 | +0.64% |
| BAH | $77.12 | +1.80% | 9.5B | 11.44 | $6.74 | +2.90% |
| FCN | $163.42 | +0.93% | 5B | 19.83 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $65.32 | -2.08% | 3.3B | 31.56 | $2.07 | +1.86% |
| ICFI | $67.64 | -1.05% | 1.2B | 13.66 | $4.95 | +0.82% |
| CRAI | $155.67 | +0.21% | 1B | 19.12 | $8.14 | +1.38% |
| SBC | $3.64 | +2.82% | 373.4M | 8.67 | $0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HURN vs VRSK Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while VRSK trades at $203.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VRSK's competition here
HURN vs EFX Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while EFX trades at $187.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EFX's competition here
HURN vs TRU Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while TRU trades at $73.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.76. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check TRU's competition here
HURN vs BAH Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while BAH trades at $77.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check BAH's competition here
HURN vs FCN Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while FCN trades at $163.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FCN's competition here
HURN vs EXPO Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while EXPO trades at $65.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 31.56. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EXPO's competition here
HURN vs ICFI Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while ICFI trades at $67.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ICFI's competition here
HURN vs CRAI Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while CRAI trades at $155.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check CRAI's competition here
HURN vs SBC Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 373.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while SBC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBC's competition here
HURN vs ROMA Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 317.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while ROMA trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -44.42. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ROMA's competition here
HURN vs EGG Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 158.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while EGG trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 282.50. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EGG's competition here
HURN vs FC Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 144.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while FC trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -100.50. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FC's competition here
HURN vs RGP Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 121.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while RGP trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RGP's competition here
HURN vs FORR Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while FORR trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FORR's competition here
HURN vs SDH Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SDH's competition here
HURN vs SBCWW Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBCWW's competition here
HURN vs RYOJ Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while RYOJ trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is -17.77. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RYOJ's competition here
HURN vs EPOW Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while EPOW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EPOW's competition here
HURN vs AERT Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while AERT trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -4.45. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERT's competition here
HURN vs GRNQ Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while GRNQ trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -13.31. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check GRNQ's competition here
HURN vs AERTW Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 838.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERTW's competition here
HURN vs INTJ Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 230.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while INTJ trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -22.03. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check INTJ's competition here
HURN vs VCIG Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 208.3K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while VCIG trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VCIG's competition here
HURN vs FGO Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HURN has daily volatility of 4.74 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
HURN vs NLSN Comparison March 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 2.2B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $126.88, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 21.73, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check NLSN's competition here