Huhtamaki India Limited
Huhtamaki India Limited (HUHTAMAKI.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUHTAMAKI.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUHTAMAKI.NS | ₹179.03 | +3.64% | 13.5B | 11.43 | ₹15.66 | +1.16% |
| TIMETECHNO.NS | ₹187.65 | -0.72% | 92.6B | 19.25 | ₹9.75 | +0.66% |
| TIMETECHNO.BO | ₹187.60 | -0.64% | 92.6B | 19.24 | ₹9.75 | +0.66% |
| EPL.BO | ₹217.75 | +0.86% | 69.7B | 17.42 | ₹12.50 | +2.32% |
| EPL.NS | ₹217.40 | +0.72% | 69.6B | 17.39 | ₹12.50 | +2.32% |
| BORORENEW.NS | ₹465.25 | -1.76% | 65.2B | -103.16 | -₹4.51 | N/A |
| BORORENEW.BO | ₹465.10 | -1.84% | 65.2B | -103.13 | -₹4.51 | N/A |
| AGI.NS | ₹555.40 | -0.08% | 35.9B | 10.79 | ₹51.47 | N/A |
| AGI.BO | ₹555.15 | -0.16% | 35.9B | 10.79 | ₹51.45 | N/A |
| UFLEX.NS | ₹475.30 | +1.25% | 34.3B | 11.85 | ₹40.10 | +0.64% |
Stock Comparison
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TIMETECHNO.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.NS has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TIMETECHNO.NS trades at ₹187.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TIMETECHNO.NS's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMETECHNO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TIMETECHNO.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TIMETECHNO.BO has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TIMETECHNO.BO trades at ₹187.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TIMETECHNO.BO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMETECHNO.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TIMETECHNO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TIMETECHNO.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs EPL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EPL.BO has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while EPL.BO trades at ₹217.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EPL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.42. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to EPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check EPL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs EPL.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EPL.NS has a market cap of 69.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while EPL.NS trades at ₹217.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EPL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to EPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check EPL.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BORORENEW.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BORORENEW.NS has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BORORENEW.NS trades at ₹465.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BORORENEW.NS's P/E ratio is -103.16. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BORORENEW.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BORORENEW.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BORORENEW.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BORORENEW.BO has a market cap of 65.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BORORENEW.BO trades at ₹465.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BORORENEW.BO's P/E ratio is -103.13. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BORORENEW.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BORORENEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BORORENEW.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AGI.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AGI.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AGI.NS trades at ₹555.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AGI.NS's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AGI.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AGI.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AGI.BO has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AGI.BO trades at ₹555.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AGI.BO's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AGI.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to AGI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AGI.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs UFLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, UFLEX.NS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while UFLEX.NS trades at ₹475.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas UFLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFLEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check UFLEX.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs UFLEX.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, UFLEX.BO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while UFLEX.BO trades at ₹472.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas UFLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFLEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to UFLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check UFLEX.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs MAXVIL.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MAXVIL.NS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while MAXVIL.NS trades at ₹216.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas MAXVIL.NS's P/E ratio is 189.47. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAXVIL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to MAXVIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check MAXVIL.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TCPLPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TCPLPACK.BO trades at ₹2,752.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TCPLPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCPLPACK.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TCPLPACK.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TCPLPACK.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TCPLPACK.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TCPLPACK.NS trades at ₹2,751.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TCPLPACK.NS's P/E ratio is 21.96. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCPLPACK.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TCPLPACK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TCPLPACK.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while MOLDTKPAC.NS trades at ₹572.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas MOLDTKPAC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.78. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs MOLDTKPAC.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, MOLDTKPAC.BO has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while MOLDTKPAC.BO trades at ₹571.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas MOLDTKPAC.BO's P/E ratio is 27.71. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to MOLDTKPAC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check MOLDTKPAC.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs COSMOFIRST.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while COSMOFIRST.NS trades at ₹704.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas COSMOFIRST.NS's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COSMOFIRST.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs COSMOFIRST.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, COSMOFIRST.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while COSMOFIRST.BO trades at ₹703.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas COSMOFIRST.BO's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COSMOFIRST.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to COSMOFIRST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check COSMOFIRST.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HUHTAMAKI.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HUHTAMAKI.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HUHTAMAKI.BO trades at ₹179.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HUHTAMAKI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to HUHTAMAKI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HUHTAMAKI.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ORICONENT.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ORICONENT.BO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ORICONENT.BO trades at ₹68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ORICONENT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.90. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORICONENT.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to ORICONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ORICONENT.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ORICONENT.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ORICONENT.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ORICONENT.NS trades at ₹67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ORICONENT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.71. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORICONENT.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ORICONENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ORICONENT.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BOROSCI.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BOROSCI.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BOROSCI.NS trades at ₹105.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BOROSCI.NS's P/E ratio is 58.40. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BOROSCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BOROSCI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BOROSCI.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SHREERAMA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.BO has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SHREERAMA.BO trades at ₹55.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SHREERAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREERAMA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SHREERAMA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SHREERAMA.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SHREERAMA.NS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SHREERAMA.NS trades at ₹55.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SHREERAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHREERAMA.NS's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to SHREERAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SHREERAMA.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs COMSYN.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, COMSYN.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while COMSYN.BO trades at ₹160.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas COMSYN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSYN.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to COMSYN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check COMSYN.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs COMSYN.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, COMSYN.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while COMSYN.NS trades at ₹159.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas COMSYN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSYN.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to COMSYN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check COMSYN.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs NAHARPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while NAHARPOLY.NS trades at ₹251.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas NAHARPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAHARPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs NAHARPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, NAHARPOLY.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while NAHARPOLY.BO trades at ₹251.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas NAHARPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NAHARPOLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check NAHARPOLY.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ARROWGREEN.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ARROWGREEN.NS trades at ₹408.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ARROWGREEN.NS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARROWGREEN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ARROWGREEN.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ARROWGREEN.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ARROWGREEN.BO trades at ₹407.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ARROWGREEN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARROWGREEN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWGREEN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ARROWGREEN.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PYRAMID.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PYRAMID.BO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PYRAMID.BO trades at ₹149.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PYRAMID.BO's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PYRAMID.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PYRAMID.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PYRAMID.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PYRAMID.NS has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PYRAMID.NS trades at ₹148.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PYRAMID.NS's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PYRAMID.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to PYRAMID.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PYRAMID.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TPLPLASTEH.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TPLPLASTEH.NS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TPLPLASTEH.NS trades at ₹68.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TPLPLASTEH.NS's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TPLPLASTEH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TPLPLASTEH.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HALDYNGL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HALDYNGL.BO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HALDYNGL.BO trades at ₹92.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HALDYNGL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HALDYNGL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to HALDYNGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HALDYNGL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs KANPRPLA.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while KANPRPLA.NS trades at ₹184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas KANPRPLA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KANPRPLA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check KANPRPLA.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs KANPRPLA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KANPRPLA.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while KANPRPLA.BO trades at ₹182.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas KANPRPLA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KANPRPLA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to KANPRPLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check KANPRPLA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BBTCL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BBTCL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BBTCL.BO trades at ₹188.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BBTCL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBTCL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BBTCL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BBTCL.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BBTCL.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BBTCL.NS trades at ₹178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BBTCL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BBTCL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BBTCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BBTCL.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs KALYANI.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KALYANI.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while KALYANI.BO trades at ₹466.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas KALYANI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KALYANI.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to KALYANI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check KALYANI.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs RDBRL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RDBRL.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while RDBRL.BO trades at ₹162.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas RDBRL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.16. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDBRL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to RDBRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check RDBRL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SAH.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SAH.BO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SAH.BO trades at ₹106.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SAH.BO's P/E ratio is 368.79. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAH.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SAH.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SAH.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SAH.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SAH.NS trades at ₹104.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SAH.NS's P/E ratio is 361.21. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAH.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to SAH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SAH.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PGFOILQ.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PGFOILQ.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PGFOILQ.BO trades at ₹221.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PGFOILQ.BO's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGFOILQ.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to PGFOILQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PGFOILQ.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HITECHCORP.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HITECHCORP.NS trades at ₹147.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HITECHCORP.NS's P/E ratio is 34.57. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HITECHCORP.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to HITECHCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HITECHCORP.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HITECHCORP.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HITECHCORP.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HITECHCORP.BO trades at ₹146.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HITECHCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HITECHCORP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to HITECHCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HITECHCORP.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs WORTH.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WORTH.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while WORTH.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas WORTH.NS's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WORTH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to WORTH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check WORTH.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BALAJEE.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BALAJEE.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BALAJEE.NS trades at ₹28.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BALAJEE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALAJEE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to BALAJEE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BALAJEE.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs WORTHPERI.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.NS has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while WORTHPERI.NS trades at ₹137.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas WORTHPERI.NS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WORTHPERI.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check WORTHPERI.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs WORTHPERI.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WORTHPERI.BO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while WORTHPERI.BO trades at ₹135.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas WORTHPERI.BO's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WORTHPERI.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to WORTHPERI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check WORTHPERI.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HPBL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HPBL.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HPBL.BO trades at ₹179.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HPBL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPBL.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to HPBL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HPBL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AERONEU.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AERONEU.NS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AERONEU.NS trades at ₹71.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AERONEU.NS's P/E ratio is 93.87. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AERONEU.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to AERONEU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AERONEU.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AERONEU.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AERONEU.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AERONEU.BO trades at ₹69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AERONEU.BO's P/E ratio is 90.99. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AERONEU.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to AERONEU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AERONEU.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs EMMBI.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EMMBI.NS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while EMMBI.NS trades at ₹90.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EMMBI.NS's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMMBI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check EMMBI.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs EMMBI.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EMMBI.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while EMMBI.BO trades at ₹90.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EMMBI.BO's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EMMBI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to EMMBI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check EMMBI.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs EASTINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, EASTINDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while EASTINDIA.BO trades at ₹113.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas EASTINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EASTINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to EASTINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check EASTINDIA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ECOPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ECOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ECOPLAST.BO trades at ₹451.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ECOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ECOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ECOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ECOPLAST.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BI.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BI.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BI.BO trades at ₹58.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BI.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to BI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BI.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs KAIRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KAIRA.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while KAIRA.BO trades at ₹1,380.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas KAIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KAIRA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to KAIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check KAIRA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HINDTIN.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HINDTIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HINDTIN.BO trades at ₹122.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HINDTIN.BO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINDTIN.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to HINDTIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HINDTIN.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs RPPL.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RPPL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while RPPL.NS trades at ₹17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas RPPL.NS's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RPPL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to RPPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check RPPL.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs WORTH.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, WORTH.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while WORTH.BO trades at ₹3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas WORTH.BO's P/E ratio is 56.50. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WORTH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to WORTH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check WORTH.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BISIL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BISIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BISIL.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BISIL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BISIL.BO's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BISIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BISIL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs CAPRIHANS.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CAPRIHANS.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while CAPRIHANS.BO trades at ₹77.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas CAPRIHANS.BO's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CAPRIHANS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to CAPRIHANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check CAPRIHANS.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SHETR.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SHETR.BO has a market cap of 989M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SHETR.BO trades at ₹109.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SHETR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHETR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to SHETR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SHETR.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs CLARA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, CLARA.BO has a market cap of 975.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while CLARA.BO trades at ₹38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas CLARA.BO's P/E ratio is 45.24. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLARA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to CLARA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check CLARA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs GUJCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GUJCONT.BO has a market cap of 926.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while GUJCONT.BO trades at ₹163.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas GUJCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GUJCONT.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to GUJCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check GUJCONT.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AMDIND.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AMDIND.NS has a market cap of 821.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AMDIND.NS trades at ₹42.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AMDIND.NS's P/E ratio is -26.61. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMDIND.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to AMDIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AMDIND.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BAPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BAPACK.BO has a market cap of 805.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BAPACK.BO trades at ₹162.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BAPACK.BO's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BAPACK.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to BAPACK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BAPACK.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AMDIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AMDIND.BO has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AMDIND.BO trades at ₹41.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AMDIND.BO's P/E ratio is -25.90. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMDIND.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to AMDIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AMDIND.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SHALIWIR.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SHALIWIR.BO has a market cap of 797M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SHALIWIR.BO trades at ₹18.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SHALIWIR.BO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHALIWIR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to SHALIWIR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SHALIWIR.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.BO has a market cap of 794.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TOKYOPLAST.BO trades at ₹83.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TOKYOPLAST.BO's P/E ratio is 75.32. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs HINDNATGLS.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, HINDNATGLS.NS has a market cap of 791.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while HINDNATGLS.NS trades at ₹8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas HINDNATGLS.NS's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HINDNATGLS.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to HINDNATGLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check HINDNATGLS.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TOKYOPLAST.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TOKYOPLAST.NS has a market cap of 788M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TOKYOPLAST.NS trades at ₹82.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TOKYOPLAST.NS's P/E ratio is 74.72. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to TOKYOPLAST.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TOKYOPLAST.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ORIENTLTD.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.NS has a market cap of 636M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ORIENTLTD.NS trades at ₹63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ORIENTLTD.NS's P/E ratio is -22.47. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORIENTLTD.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ORIENTLTD.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ORIENTLTD.BO has a market cap of 630M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ORIENTLTD.BO trades at ₹63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ORIENTLTD.BO's P/E ratio is -22.26. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORIENTLTD.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ORIENTLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ORIENTLTD.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PERFEPA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PERFEPA.BO has a market cap of 566.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PERFEPA.BO trades at ₹85.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PERFEPA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PERFEPA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to PERFEPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PERFEPA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BALKRISHNA.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.BO has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BALKRISHNA.BO trades at ₹16.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BALKRISHNA.BO's P/E ratio is -8.68. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALKRISHNA.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs BALKRISHNA.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, BALKRISHNA.NS has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while BALKRISHNA.NS trades at ₹16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas BALKRISHNA.NS's P/E ratio is -8.61. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BALKRISHNA.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to BALKRISHNA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check BALKRISHNA.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs GUJCRAFT.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GUJCRAFT.BO has a market cap of 518.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while GUJCRAFT.BO trades at ₹106.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas GUJCRAFT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.38. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GUJCRAFT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to GUJCRAFT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check GUJCRAFT.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs JUMBO.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, JUMBO.BO has a market cap of 492.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while JUMBO.BO trades at ₹58.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas JUMBO.BO's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JUMBO.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to JUMBO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check JUMBO.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SIEL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SIEL.BO has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SIEL.BO trades at ₹34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SIEL.BO's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to SIEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SIEL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs SPL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, SPL.BO has a market cap of 432.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while SPL.BO trades at ₹22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas SPL.BO's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SPL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to SPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check SPL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs INNOVTEC.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, INNOVTEC.BO has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while INNOVTEC.BO trades at ₹17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas INNOVTEC.BO's P/E ratio is -13.93. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INNOVTEC.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to INNOVTEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check INNOVTEC.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PEARLPOLY.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.BO has a market cap of 331.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PEARLPOLY.BO trades at ₹19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PEARLPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEARLPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PEARLPOLY.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PEARLPOLY.NS has a market cap of 321.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PEARLPOLY.NS trades at ₹19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PEARLPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEARLPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to PEARLPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PEARLPOLY.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs RISHITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RISHITECH.BO has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while RISHITECH.BO trades at ₹41.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas RISHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RISHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to RISHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check RISHITECH.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs POLYSPIN.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, POLYSPIN.BO has a market cap of 302M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while POLYSPIN.BO trades at ₹30.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas POLYSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to POLYSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to POLYSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check POLYSPIN.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs RCAN.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RCAN.BO has a market cap of 251.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while RCAN.BO trades at ₹24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas RCAN.BO's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCAN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to RCAN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check RCAN.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs KSHITIJPOL.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, KSHITIJPOL.NS has a market cap of 238.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while KSHITIJPOL.NS trades at ₹2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas KSHITIJPOL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to KSHITIJPOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check KSHITIJPOL.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs JAUSPOL.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, JAUSPOL.BO has a market cap of 171.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while JAUSPOL.BO trades at ₹37.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas JAUSPOL.BO's P/E ratio is 337.36. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JAUSPOL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to JAUSPOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check JAUSPOL.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TRANSFRE.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TRANSFRE.BO has a market cap of 154.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TRANSFRE.BO trades at ₹21.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TRANSFRE.BO's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TRANSFRE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TRANSFRE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TRANSFRE.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ANUROOP.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ANUROOP.BO has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ANUROOP.BO trades at ₹12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ANUROOP.BO's P/E ratio is 3.48. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANUROOP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to ANUROOP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ANUROOP.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs RAJPACK.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, RAJPACK.BO has a market cap of 135.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while RAJPACK.BO trades at ₹29.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas RAJPACK.BO's P/E ratio is -39.60. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RAJPACK.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to RAJPACK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check RAJPACK.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ANTGRAPHIC.NS Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ANTGRAPHIC.NS has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ANTGRAPHIC.NS trades at ₹0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ANTGRAPHIC.NS's P/E ratio is -29.00. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ANTGRAPHIC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ANTGRAPHIC.NS's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs GKP.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, GKP.BO has a market cap of 131.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while GKP.BO trades at ₹5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas GKP.BO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GKP.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to GKP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check GKP.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs ARROWHEAD.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, ARROWHEAD.BO has a market cap of 131.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while ARROWHEAD.BO trades at ₹70.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas ARROWHEAD.BO's P/E ratio is -32.30. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ARROWHEAD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to ARROWHEAD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check ARROWHEAD.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs TIRTPLS.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, TIRTPLS.BO has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while TIRTPLS.BO trades at ₹24.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas TIRTPLS.BO's P/E ratio is 47.12. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIRTPLS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to TIRTPLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check TIRTPLS.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs AADIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, AADIIND.BO has a market cap of 93.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while AADIIND.BO trades at ₹9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas AADIIND.BO's P/E ratio is -58.50. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AADIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to AADIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check AADIIND.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs YASHRAJC.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, YASHRAJC.BO has a market cap of 83.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while YASHRAJC.BO trades at ₹4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas YASHRAJC.BO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to YASHRAJC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is more volatile compared to YASHRAJC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check YASHRAJC.BO's competition here
HUHTAMAKI.NS vs PROMACT.BO Comparison February 2026
HUHTAMAKI.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUHTAMAKI.NS stands at 13.5B. In comparison, PROMACT.BO has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, HUHTAMAKI.NS is priced at ₹179.03, while PROMACT.BO trades at ₹10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUHTAMAKI.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 11.43, whereas PROMACT.BO's P/E ratio is 136.25. In terms of profitability, HUHTAMAKI.NS's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PROMACT.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUHTAMAKI.NS is less volatile compared to PROMACT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUHTAMAKI.NS.Check PROMACT.BO's competition here