Turtle Beach Corporation
Turtle Beach Corporation (HEAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HEAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| AAPL | $260.58 | +0.00% | 3.9T | 33.45 | $7.91 | +0.39% |
| SONY | $22.25 | +0.00% | 130.8B | 16.24 | $1.35 | +0.48% |
| NXT | $116.05 | +0.00% | 17.7B | 30.44 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.45 | +0.11% | 4.8B | 29.72 | $0.16 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $15.66 | +0.00% | 1.9B | -96.31 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| ZEPP | $22.46 | +0.00% | 309.6M | -5.40 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| TBCH | $11.92 | +0.00% | 235.5M | 13.36 | $0.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HEAR vs AAPL Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.9T. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while AAPL trades at $260.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check AAPL's competition here
HEAR vs SONY Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONY trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 16.24. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONY's competition here
HEAR vs NXT Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while NXT trades at $116.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 30.44. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check NXT's competition here
HEAR vs LPL Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while LPL trades at $4.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 29.72. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check LPL's competition here
HEAR vs BWSN Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWSN's competition here
HEAR vs VZIO Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VZIO's competition here
HEAR vs SONO Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONO trades at $15.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -96.31. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONO's competition here
HEAR vs ZEPP Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while ZEPP trades at $22.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -5.40. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check ZEPP's competition here
HEAR vs TBCH Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 235.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while TBCH trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check TBCH's competition here
HEAR vs VUZI Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 221.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VUZI trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -5.63. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VUZI's competition here
HEAR vs VOXX Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VOXX's competition here
HEAR vs GPRO Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 126.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while GPRO trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check GPRO's competition here
HEAR vs BWNB Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 90.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWNB trades at $24.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.39. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWNB's competition here
HEAR vs KOSS Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while KOSS trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -48.27. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check KOSS's competition here
HEAR vs FEBO Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while FEBO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.75. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check FEBO's competition here
HEAR vs PXDT Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check PXDT's competition here
HEAR vs MSN Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MSN trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MSN's competition here
HEAR vs MICS Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MICS's ROE of -13.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MICS's competition here
HEAR vs UTME Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check UTME's competition here
HEAR vs RIME Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while RIME trades at $2.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to RIME's ROE of -54.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check RIME's competition here
HEAR vs WTO Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WTO trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WTO's ROE of -5.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WTO's competition here
HEAR vs WLDSW Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 968.5K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDSW trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDSW's competition here
HEAR vs WLDS Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 710.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDS trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDS's competition here
HEAR vs BOXL Comparison February 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 685.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BOXL trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.16%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BOXL's competition here