Turtle Beach Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HEAR
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for HEAR
Turtle Beach Corporation (HEAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HEAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
| AAPL | $260.48 | -0.00% | 3.8T | 32.93 | $7.91 | +0.40% |
| SONY | $21.05 | -1.73% | 125.6B | 16.31 | $1.29 | +0.50% |
| NXT | $117.97 | +3.86% | 17.5B | 30.09 | $3.92 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.49 | +6.15% | 4.5B | 29.93 | $0.15 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $12.97 | -0.54% | 1.6B | -81.06 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| TBCH | $10.35 | -0.10% | 202.9M | 13.44 | $0.77 | N/A |
| VUZI | $2.40 | +0.00% | 199.6M | -5.71 | -$0.42 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HEAR vs AAPL Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 3.8T. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while AAPL trades at $260.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check AAPL's competition here
HEAR vs SONY Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONY trades at $21.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONY's competition here
HEAR vs NXT Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while NXT trades at $117.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 30.09. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check NXT's competition here
HEAR vs LPL Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while LPL trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LPL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check LPL's competition here
HEAR vs BWSN Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWSN's competition here
HEAR vs VZIO Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VZIO's competition here
HEAR vs SONO Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while SONO trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is -81.06. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SONO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check SONO's competition here
HEAR vs TBCH Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while TBCH trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check TBCH's competition here
HEAR vs VUZI Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 199.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VUZI trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -5.71. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VUZI's competition here
HEAR vs ZEPP Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 187.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while ZEPP trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check ZEPP's competition here
HEAR vs VOXX Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check VOXX's competition here
HEAR vs GPRO Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 125.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while GPRO trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check GPRO's competition here
HEAR vs BWNB Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BWNB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.42. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BWNB's competition here
HEAR vs KOSS Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 36.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while KOSS trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -42.89. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check KOSS's competition here
HEAR vs FEBO Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 12.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while FEBO trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -5.77. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check FEBO's competition here
HEAR vs MSN Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MSN trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MSN's competition here
HEAR vs PXDT Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check PXDT's competition here
HEAR vs MICS Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, MICS has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while MICS trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas MICS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MICS's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to MICS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check MICS's competition here
HEAR vs UTME Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check UTME's competition here
HEAR vs RIME Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while RIME trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RIME's ROE of -6.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check RIME's competition here
HEAR vs WTO Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WTO trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WTO's competition here
HEAR vs WLDSW Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 684.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDSW trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is more volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDSW's competition here
HEAR vs BOXL Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 525.6K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while BOXL trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BOXL's ROE of +10.47%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check BOXL's competition here
HEAR vs WLDS Comparison April 2026
HEAR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HEAR stands at 357.4M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 426.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HEAR is priced at $17.80, while WLDS trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HEAR currently has a P/E ratio of 57.42, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HEAR's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, HEAR is less volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HEAR.Check WLDS's competition here