Hindustan Construction Company Limited
Hindustan Construction Company Limited (HCC.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HCC.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Engineering & Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCC.NS | ₹18.50 | -1.91% | 35B | 19.67 | ₹0.95 | N/A |
| LT.NS | ₹4,418.10 | +3.21% | 6T | 34.21 | ₹128.05 | +0.78% |
| LT.BO | ₹4,417.15 | +3.23% | 6T | 34.24 | ₹127.91 | +0.78% |
| RVNL.BO | ₹319.30 | +4.09% | 650.8B | 56.75 | ₹5.50 | +0.87% |
| RVNL.NS | ₹319.20 | +4.02% | 650.7B | 56.75 | ₹5.50 | +0.87% |
| NBCC.NS | ₹95.34 | -0.15% | 256.3B | 39.22 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| NBCC.BO | ₹95.33 | -0.20% | 256.2B | 39.21 | ₹2.42 | +0.59% |
| KPIL.BO | ₹1,188.00 | +7.40% | 194B | 23.55 | ₹48.23 | +0.79% |
| KPIL.NS | ₹1,187.00 | +7.28% | 193.9B | 23.54 | ₹48.24 | +0.79% |
| KEC.NS | ₹582.65 | -0.60% | 155.7B | 22.53 | ₹25.97 | +0.94% |
Stock Comparison
HCC.NS vs LT.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, LT.NS has a market cap of 6T. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while LT.NS trades at ₹4,418.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas LT.NS's P/E ratio is 34.21. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to LT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs LT.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, LT.BO has a market cap of 6T. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while LT.BO trades at ₹4,417.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas LT.BO's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to LT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs RVNL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, RVNL.BO has a market cap of 650.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while RVNL.BO trades at ₹319.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RVNL.BO's P/E ratio is 56.75. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RVNL.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to RVNL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RVNL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs RVNL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, RVNL.NS has a market cap of 650.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while RVNL.NS trades at ₹319.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RVNL.NS's P/E ratio is 56.75. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RVNL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to RVNL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RVNL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs NBCC.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, NBCC.NS has a market cap of 256.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while NBCC.NS trades at ₹95.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NBCC.NS's P/E ratio is 39.22. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBCC.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NBCC.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs NBCC.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, NBCC.BO has a market cap of 256.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while NBCC.BO trades at ₹95.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NBCC.BO's P/E ratio is 39.21. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NBCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NBCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NBCC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KPIL.BO has a market cap of 194B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KPIL.BO trades at ₹1,188.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KPIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KPIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KPIL.NS has a market cap of 193.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KPIL.NS trades at ₹1,187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KPIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to KPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KPIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KEC.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KEC.NS has a market cap of 155.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KEC.NS trades at ₹582.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KEC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KEC.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KEC.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KEC.BO has a market cap of 155.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KEC.BO trades at ₹583.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KEC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KEC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs IRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, IRCON.NS has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while IRCON.NS trades at ₹149.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas IRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check IRCON.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs IRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, IRCON.BO has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while IRCON.BO trades at ₹149.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas IRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to IRCON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check IRCON.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs TECHNOE.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, TECHNOE.BO has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while TECHNOE.BO trades at ₹1,160.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas TECHNOE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TECHNOE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TECHNOE.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs TECHNOE.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, TECHNOE.NS has a market cap of 133.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while TECHNOE.NS trades at ₹1,160.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas TECHNOE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TECHNOE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to TECHNOE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TECHNOE.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ENGINERSIN.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.BO has a market cap of 120.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ENGINERSIN.BO trades at ₹216.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ENGINERSIN.BO's P/E ratio is 22.47. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENGINERSIN.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs ENGINERSIN.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ENGINERSIN.NS has a market cap of 120.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ENGINERSIN.NS trades at ₹217.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ENGINERSIN.NS's P/E ratio is 22.46. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ENGINERSIN.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ENGINERSIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ENGINERSIN.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs AFCONS.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, AFCONS.NS has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while AFCONS.NS trades at ₹312.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas AFCONS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.45. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AFCONS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to AFCONS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AFCONS.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs RITES.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, RITES.BO has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while RITES.BO trades at ₹219.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RITES.BO's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RITES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RITES.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs RITES.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, RITES.NS has a market cap of 105B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while RITES.NS trades at ₹219.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RITES.NS's P/E ratio is 25.44. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RITES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RITES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RITES.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEMPRO.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, CEMPRO.BO has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while CEMPRO.BO trades at ₹604.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CEMPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEMPRO.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEMPRO.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEMPRO.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, CEMPRO.NS has a market cap of 101.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while CEMPRO.NS trades at ₹604.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CEMPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEMPRO.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to CEMPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEMPRO.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ITDCEM.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ITDCEM.BO has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ITDCEM.BO trades at ₹604.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ITDCEM.BO's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITDCEM.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ITDCEM.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs ITDCEM.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ITDCEM.NS has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ITDCEM.NS trades at ₹604.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ITDCEM.NS's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITDCEM.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ITDCEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ITDCEM.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GRINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GRINFRA.NS has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GRINFRA.NS trades at ₹975.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GRINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GRINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GRINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GRINFRA.BO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GRINFRA.BO trades at ₹975.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GRINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GRINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GRINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GRINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs NCC.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, NCC.NS has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while NCC.NS trades at ₹149.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NCC.NS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NCC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NCC.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs NCC.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, NCC.BO has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while NCC.BO trades at ₹149.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas NCC.BO's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NCC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to NCC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check NCC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KALPATPOWR.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KALPATPOWR.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KALPATPOWR.NS trades at ₹522.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KALPATPOWR.NS's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KALPATPOWR.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to KALPATPOWR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KALPATPOWR.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs TRANSRAILL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.BO has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while TRANSRAILL.BO trades at ₹562.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas TRANSRAILL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRANSRAILL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs TRANSRAILL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, TRANSRAILL.NS has a market cap of 76.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while TRANSRAILL.NS trades at ₹562.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas TRANSRAILL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.61. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TRANSRAILL.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to TRANSRAILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check TRANSRAILL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs DBL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, DBL.BO has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while DBL.BO trades at ₹444.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas DBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DBL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DBL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs DBL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, DBL.NS has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while DBL.NS trades at ₹443.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas DBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DBL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to DBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DBL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs POWERMECH.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, POWERMECH.NS has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while POWERMECH.NS trades at ₹2,177.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas POWERMECH.NS's P/E ratio is 20.46. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POWERMECH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check POWERMECH.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs POWERMECH.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, POWERMECH.BO has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while POWERMECH.BO trades at ₹2,176.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas POWERMECH.BO's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POWERMECH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to POWERMECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check POWERMECH.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs LOTUSDEV.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.NS has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while LOTUSDEV.NS trades at ₹145.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas LOTUSDEV.NS's P/E ratio is 30.02. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOTUSDEV.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs LOTUSDEV.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, LOTUSDEV.BO has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while LOTUSDEV.BO trades at ₹145.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas LOTUSDEV.BO's P/E ratio is 30.08. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to LOTUSDEV.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to LOTUSDEV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check LOTUSDEV.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs WELENT.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, WELENT.BO has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while WELENT.BO trades at ₹490.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WELENT.BO's P/E ratio is 21.91. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WELENT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to WELENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check WELENT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs WELENT.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, WELENT.NS has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while WELENT.NS trades at ₹490.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas WELENT.NS's P/E ratio is 21.68. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WELENT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to WELENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check WELENT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs AXISCADES.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, AXISCADES.BO has a market cap of 60.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while AXISCADES.BO trades at ₹1,406.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas AXISCADES.BO's P/E ratio is 59.38. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXISCADES.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AXISCADES.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs AXISCADES.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, AXISCADES.NS has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while AXISCADES.NS trades at ₹1,404.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas AXISCADES.NS's P/E ratio is 59.22. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXISCADES.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to AXISCADES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AXISCADES.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PRAJIND.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PRAJIND.NS has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PRAJIND.NS trades at ₹309.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PRAJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 110.05. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRAJIND.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PRAJIND.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PRAJIND.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PRAJIND.BO has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PRAJIND.BO trades at ₹309.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PRAJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRAJIND.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to PRAJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PRAJIND.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs PNCINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.NS has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PNCINFRA.NS trades at ₹217.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PNCINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNCINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PNCINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PNCINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PNCINFRA.BO has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PNCINFRA.BO trades at ₹217.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PNCINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNCINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to PNCINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PNCINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs AHLUCONT.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.NS has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while AHLUCONT.NS trades at ₹805.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas AHLUCONT.NS's P/E ratio is 20.21. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHLUCONT.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AHLUCONT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs AHLUCONT.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, AHLUCONT.BO has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while AHLUCONT.BO trades at ₹804.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas AHLUCONT.BO's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHLUCONT.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to AHLUCONT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check AHLUCONT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEIGALL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, CEIGALL.NS has a market cap of 50B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while CEIGALL.NS trades at ₹286.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CEIGALL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEIGALL.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CEIGALL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEIGALL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs MANINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, MANINFRA.BO has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while MANINFRA.BO trades at ₹111.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas MANINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MANINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check MANINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs MANINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, MANINFRA.NS has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while MANINFRA.NS trades at ₹110.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas MANINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 18.36. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MANINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to MANINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check MANINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SKIPPER.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SKIPPER.NS has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SKIPPER.NS trades at ₹376.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SKIPPER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKIPPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SKIPPER.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SKIPPER.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SKIPPER.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SKIPPER.BO trades at ₹377.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SKIPPER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.39. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SKIPPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SKIPPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SKIPPER.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs JKIL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, JKIL.NS has a market cap of 41.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while JKIL.NS trades at ₹554.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JKIL.NS's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JKIL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to JKIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check JKIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs JKIL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, JKIL.BO has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while JKIL.BO trades at ₹554.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JKIL.BO's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JKIL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to JKIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check JKIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs ASHOKA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ASHOKA.NS has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ASHOKA.NS trades at ₹143.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ASHOKA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASHOKA.NS's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ASHOKA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs ASHOKA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ASHOKA.BO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ASHOKA.BO trades at ₹143.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ASHOKA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.41. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ASHOKA.BO's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ASHOKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ASHOKA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs KNRCON.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KNRCON.NS has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KNRCON.NS trades at ₹138.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KNRCON.NS's P/E ratio is 8.37. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KNRCON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KNRCON.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KNRCON.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KNRCON.BO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KNRCON.BO trades at ₹138.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KNRCON.BO's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KNRCON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to KNRCON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KNRCON.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs HGINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, HGINFRA.BO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while HGINFRA.BO trades at ₹580.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas HGINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HGINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check HGINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs HGINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, HGINFRA.NS has a market cap of 38.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while HGINFRA.NS trades at ₹582.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas HGINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HGINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to HGINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check HGINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs BONDADA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, BONDADA.BO has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while BONDADA.BO trades at ₹326.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BONDADA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BONDADA.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to BONDADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check BONDADA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs HCC.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, HCC.BO has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while HCC.BO trades at ₹18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas HCC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HCC.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to HCC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check HCC.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs RAMKY.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, RAMKY.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while RAMKY.BO trades at ₹470.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RAMKY.BO's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RAMKY.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RAMKY.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs RAMKY.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, RAMKY.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while RAMKY.NS trades at ₹470.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas RAMKY.NS's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RAMKY.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to RAMKY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check RAMKY.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GVPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GVPIL.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GVPIL.NS trades at ₹492.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GVPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 63.19. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GVPIL.NS's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GVPIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GVPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GVPIL.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GVPIL.BO trades at ₹493.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GVPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 63.14. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GVPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GVPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GVPIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs INTERARCH.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, INTERARCH.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while INTERARCH.NS trades at ₹1,920.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas INTERARCH.NS's P/E ratio is 23.83. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INTERARCH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to INTERARCH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check INTERARCH.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PSPPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PSPPROJECT.NS trades at ₹764.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PSPPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 73.85. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSPPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PSPPROJECT.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PSPPROJECT.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PSPPROJECT.BO trades at ₹762.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PSPPROJECT.BO's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSPPROJECT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to PSPPROJECT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PSPPROJECT.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs EIEL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, EIEL.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while EIEL.NS trades at ₹163.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas EIEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EIEL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to EIEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check EIEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs DREDGECORP.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while DREDGECORP.BO trades at ₹935.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas DREDGECORP.BO's P/E ratio is -39.94. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DREDGECORP.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DREDGECORP.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs DREDGECORP.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, DREDGECORP.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while DREDGECORP.NS trades at ₹933.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas DREDGECORP.NS's P/E ratio is -39.98. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DREDGECORP.NS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to DREDGECORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check DREDGECORP.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PATELENG.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PATELENG.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PATELENG.NS trades at ₹27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PATELENG.NS's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PATELENG.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to PATELENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PATELENG.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs PATELENG.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, PATELENG.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while PATELENG.BO trades at ₹27.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas PATELENG.BO's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PATELENG.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to PATELENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check PATELENG.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GEPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GEPIL.BO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GEPIL.BO trades at ₹360.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GEPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 75.97. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEPIL.BO's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GEPIL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GEPIL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GEPIL.NS has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GEPIL.NS trades at ₹359.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GEPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 76.32. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GEPIL.NS's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GEPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GEPIL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs BGRENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while BGRENERGY.BO trades at ₹331.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BGRENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BGRENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check BGRENERGY.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs BGRENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, BGRENERGY.NS has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while BGRENERGY.NS trades at ₹330.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas BGRENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BGRENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to BGRENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check BGRENERGY.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs CAPACITE.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, CAPACITE.NS has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while CAPACITE.NS trades at ₹243.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CAPACITE.NS's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAPACITE.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CAPACITE.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs CAPACITE.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, CAPACITE.BO has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while CAPACITE.BO trades at ₹243.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CAPACITE.BO's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CAPACITE.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to CAPACITE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CAPACITE.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs MBEL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, MBEL.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while MBEL.NS trades at ₹325.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas MBEL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MBEL.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to MBEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check MBEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs JMCPROJECT.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, JMCPROJECT.NS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while JMCPROJECT.NS trades at ₹119.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas JMCPROJECT.NS's P/E ratio is 18.62. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JMCPROJECT.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to JMCPROJECT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check JMCPROJECT.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs KPEL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, KPEL.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while KPEL.NS trades at ₹296.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas KPEL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KPEL.NS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to KPEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check KPEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs INDIANHUME.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while INDIANHUME.BO trades at ₹356.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas INDIANHUME.BO's P/E ratio is 3.36. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDIANHUME.BO's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check INDIANHUME.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs INDIANHUME.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, INDIANHUME.NS has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while INDIANHUME.NS trades at ₹358.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas INDIANHUME.NS's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to INDIANHUME.NS's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to INDIANHUME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check INDIANHUME.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs CEINSYSTECH.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, CEINSYSTECH.BO has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while CEINSYSTECH.BO trades at ₹1,014.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas CEINSYSTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to CEINSYSTECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check CEINSYSTECH.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GARUDA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GARUDA.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GARUDA.NS trades at ₹184.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GARUDA.NS's P/E ratio is 19.86. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GARUDA.NS's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GARUDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GARUDA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs EMSLIMITED.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while EMSLIMITED.BO trades at ₹310.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas EMSLIMITED.BO's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMSLIMITED.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs EMSLIMITED.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, EMSLIMITED.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while EMSLIMITED.NS trades at ₹310.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas EMSLIMITED.NS's P/E ratio is 10.48. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMSLIMITED.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to EMSLIMITED.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check EMSLIMITED.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GARUDA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GARUDA.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GARUDA.BO trades at ₹184.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GARUDA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.83. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GARUDA.BO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is more volatile compared to GARUDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GARUDA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.NS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SIMPLEXINF.NS trades at ₹202.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SIMPLEXINF.NS's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SIMPLEXINF.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SIMPLEXINF.BO has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SIMPLEXINF.BO trades at ₹199.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SIMPLEXINF.BO's P/E ratio is 28.56. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SIMPLEXINF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SIMPLEXINF.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs GPTINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GPTINFRA.NS trades at ₹124.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GPTINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPTINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GPTINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs GPTINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, GPTINFRA.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while GPTINFRA.BO trades at ₹124.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas GPTINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GPTINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to GPTINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check GPTINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs ABINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, ABINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while ABINFRA.NS trades at ₹20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas ABINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 58.59. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ABINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to ABINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check ABINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SPMLINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.BO has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SPMLINFRA.BO trades at ₹173.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SPMLINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.54. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPMLINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs SPMLINFRA.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SPMLINFRA.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SPMLINFRA.NS trades at ₹173.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SPMLINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SPMLINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SPMLINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SPMLINFRA.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs VINDHYATEL.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while VINDHYATEL.BO trades at ₹1,063.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas VINDHYATEL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VINDHYATEL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.BO's competition here
HCC.NS vs VINDHYATEL.NS Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, VINDHYATEL.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while VINDHYATEL.NS trades at ₹1,061.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas VINDHYATEL.NS's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VINDHYATEL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to VINDHYATEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check VINDHYATEL.NS's competition here
HCC.NS vs SEPC.BO Comparison February 2026
HCC.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HCC.NS stands at 35B. In comparison, SEPC.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HCC.NS is priced at ₹18.50, while SEPC.BO trades at ₹8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HCC.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.67, whereas SEPC.BO's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, HCC.NS's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SEPC.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HCC.NS is less volatile compared to SEPC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HCC.NS.Check SEPC.BO's competition here