Greenpro Capital Corp.
Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GRNQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRNQ | $2.08 | -1.89% | 16.2M | -13.00 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| VRSK | $204.39 | +0.29% | 28.5B | 31.01 | $6.59 | +0.90% |
| EFX | $183.79 | -1.88% | 22.5B | 34.56 | $5.32 | +1.11% |
| TRU | $73.05 | -0.83% | 14.2B | 31.48 | $2.32 | +0.64% |
| BAH | $78.66 | +2.00% | 9.7B | 11.68 | $6.74 | +2.83% |
| FCN | $164.99 | +0.96% | 5.1B | 20.03 | $8.24 | N/A |
| EXPO | $64.50 | -1.26% | 3.2B | 31.46 | $2.05 | +1.86% |
| HURN | $125.48 | -1.10% | 2.2B | 21.49 | $5.84 | N/A |
| ICFI | $66.43 | -1.79% | 1.2B | 13.42 | $4.95 | +0.84% |
| CRAI | $154.44 | -0.79% | 1B | 18.97 | $8.14 | +1.37% |
Stock Comparison
GRNQ vs VRSK Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while VRSK trades at $204.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 31.01. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check VRSK's competition here
GRNQ vs EFX Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while EFX trades at $183.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 34.56. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EFX's competition here
GRNQ vs TRU Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while TRU trades at $73.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.48. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check TRU's competition here
GRNQ vs BAH Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while BAH trades at $78.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check BAH's competition here
GRNQ vs FCN Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while FCN trades at $164.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 20.03. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check FCN's competition here
GRNQ vs EXPO Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while EXPO trades at $64.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EXPO's competition here
GRNQ vs HURN Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while HURN trades at $125.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.49. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check HURN's competition here
GRNQ vs ICFI Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while ICFI trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check ICFI's competition here
GRNQ vs CRAI Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while CRAI trades at $154.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 18.97. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check CRAI's competition here
GRNQ vs SBC Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 359M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while SBC trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check SBC's competition here
GRNQ vs ROMA Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 322.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while ROMA trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -45.08. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check ROMA's competition here
GRNQ vs EGG Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while EGG trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EGG's competition here
GRNQ vs FC Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while FC trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -97.25. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check FC's competition here
GRNQ vs RGP Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 124M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while RGP trades at $3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check RGP's competition here
GRNQ vs FORR Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while FORR trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check FORR's competition here
GRNQ vs SDH Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check SDH's competition here
GRNQ vs SBCWW Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check SBCWW's competition here
GRNQ vs RYOJ Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while RYOJ trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is -18.23. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check RYOJ's competition here
GRNQ vs EPOW Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while EPOW trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.28. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EPOW's competition here
GRNQ vs AERT Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 15.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while AERT trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check AERT's competition here
GRNQ vs AERTW Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 838.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check AERTW's competition here
GRNQ vs INTJ Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 221.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while INTJ trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check INTJ's competition here
GRNQ vs VCIG Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 197.4K. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while VCIG trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check VCIG's competition here
GRNQ vs FGO Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GRNQ has daily volatility of 3.88 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
GRNQ vs NLSN Comparison March 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 16.2M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $2.08, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -13.00, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check NLSN's competition here