Greenpro Capital Corp.
Greenpro Capital Corp. (GRNQ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GRNQ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRNQ | $1.62 | +0.00% | 12.7M | -9.59 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| VRSK | $191.17 | +0.00% | 27.3B | 30.13 | $6.50 | +0.92% |
| EFX | $194.32 | +0.00% | 24.2B | 37.31 | $5.31 | +0.96% |
| TRU | $72.01 | +0.00% | 14.4B | 31.99 | $2.32 | +0.62% |
| BAH | $75.70 | +0.00% | 9.3B | 11.14 | $6.74 | +2.97% |
| FCN | $156.70 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 20.52 | $7.80 | N/A |
| EXPO | $70.19 | +0.00% | 3.5B | 34.72 | $2.03 | +1.71% |
| HURN | $126.36 | +0.00% | 2.3B | 22.33 | $5.97 | N/A |
| ICFI | $75.15 | +0.00% | 1.4B | 14.18 | $5.30 | +0.75% |
| CRAI | $156.96 | +0.00% | 1.1B | 19.24 | $8.33 | +1.26% |
Stock Comparison
GRNQ vs VRSK Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while VRSK trades at $191.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check VRSK's competition here
GRNQ vs EFX Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while EFX trades at $194.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EFX's competition here
GRNQ vs TRU Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while TRU trades at $72.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check TRU's competition here
GRNQ vs BAH Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while BAH trades at $75.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check BAH's competition here
GRNQ vs FCN Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while FCN trades at $156.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check FCN's competition here
GRNQ vs EXPO Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while EXPO trades at $70.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EXPO's competition here
GRNQ vs HURN Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while HURN trades at $126.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check HURN's competition here
GRNQ vs ICFI Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while ICFI trades at $75.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check ICFI's competition here
GRNQ vs CRAI Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while CRAI trades at $156.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check CRAI's competition here
GRNQ vs SBC Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while SBC trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check SBC's competition here
GRNQ vs FC Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while FC trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -114.00. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check FC's competition here
GRNQ vs ROMA Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while ROMA trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check ROMA's competition here
GRNQ vs EGG Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 151.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while EGG trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 60.11. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EGG's competition here
GRNQ vs RGP Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while RGP trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check RGP's competition here
GRNQ vs FORR Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while FORR trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check FORR's competition here
GRNQ vs SDH Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check SDH's competition here
GRNQ vs RYOJ Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while RYOJ trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check RYOJ's competition here
GRNQ vs SBCWW Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check SBCWW's competition here
GRNQ vs EPOW Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while EPOW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check EPOW's competition here
GRNQ vs AERT Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while AERT trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check AERT's competition here
GRNQ vs VCIG Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while VCIG trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check VCIG's competition here
GRNQ vs AERTW Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while AERTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check AERTW's competition here
GRNQ vs INTJ Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 225.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while INTJ trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check INTJ's competition here
GRNQ vs FGO Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GRNQ has daily volatility of 4.26 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
GRNQ vs NLSN Comparison February 2026
GRNQ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRNQ stands at 12.7M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRNQ is priced at $1.62, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRNQ currently has a P/E ratio of -9.59, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, GRNQ's ROE is -0.27%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRNQ is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRNQ.Check NLSN's competition here