General Motors Company
General Motors Company GM Peers
See (GM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GM | $49.60 | +4.42% | 47.69B | 6.93 | $7.16 | +0.97% |
| TSLA | $318.38 | +6.75% | 1.02T | 182.98 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $192.26 | +2.52% | 250.89B | 7.23 | $26.60 | +1.21% |
| RACE | $486.78 | -0.31% | 86.75B | 48.87 | $9.96 | +0.63% |
| F-PC | $20.45 | +0.20% | 41.56B | N/A | N/A | +7.12% |
| F-PD | $21.30 | -0.33% | 41.34B | N/A | N/A | +7.12% |
| F-PB | $20.55 | -0.10% | 41.28B | N/A | N/A | +7.12% |
| F | $10.54 | +1.05% | 41.17B | 8.43 | $1.25 | +7.12% |
| STLA | $10.48 | +6.56% | 30.01B | 5.04 | $2.08 | +8.24% |
| XPEV | $21.15 | +7.73% | 20.23B | -25.18 | -$0.84 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GM vs TSLA Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.02T. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while TSLA trades at $318.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 182.98. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs TM Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 250.89B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while TM trades at $192.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs RACE Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 86.75B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while RACE trades at $486.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.87. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs F-PC Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 41.56B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while F-PC trades at $20.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs F-PD Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 41.34B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while F-PD trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs F-PB Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 41.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while F-PB trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs F Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, F has a market cap of 41.17B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while F trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs STLA Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 30.01B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while STLA trades at $10.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs XPEV Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 20.23B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while XPEV trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -25.18. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs RIVN Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 16.67B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while RIVN trades at $14.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs HMC Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 15.95B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while HMC trades at $30.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs LI Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while LI trades at $28.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs NIO Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 8.80B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while NIO trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIO's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs VFS Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.77B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while VFS trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs LCID Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 7.99B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while LCID trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs ZK Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.28B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while ZK trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -7.67. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs PSNY Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.30B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while PSNY trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs LOT Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while LOT trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs BLBD Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while BLBD trades at $39.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs VFSWW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 694.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while VFSWW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs NAKD Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs LVWR Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 224.94M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while LVWR trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs NIU Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 137.61M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while NIU trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs FFAI Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 119.03M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while FFAI trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs FFIEW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs FFIE Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.76M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs LOTWW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 101.52M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while LOTWW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs CJET Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 69.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while CJET trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs FSR Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.82M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs CENN Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 27.69M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while CENN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs SOLO Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs RIDE Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs DMN Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 18.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while DMN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs GP Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 13.05M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while GP trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs ECDA Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while ECDA trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs FLYE Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 11.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while FLYE trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs PEV Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.58M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs ARVL Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9.00M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs SVMH Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs LOBO Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 6.78M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while LOBO trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs EVTV Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 5.66M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while EVTV trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs GOEV Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.36M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs WKHS Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 5.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while WKHS trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs HYZN Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 4.97M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs AYRO Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while AYRO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AYRO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs PSNYW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 3.18M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +4.87%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs EGOX Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs VLCN Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 2.85M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while VLCN trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -10.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs VEV Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.53M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs ZAPP Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 2.38M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while ZAPP trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs FFAIW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs AIEV Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 532609.00. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while AIEV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs ECDAW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 484784.00. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while ECDAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs MULN Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 401760.00. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while MULN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.
GM vs GOEVW Comparison
GM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GM stands at 47.69B. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365712.00. Regarding current trading prices, GM is priced at $49.60, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GM currently has a P/E ratio of 6.93, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GM's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GM is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GM.