Forward Industries, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FWDI
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FWDI
Forward Industries, Inc. (FWDI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FWDI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Footwear & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWDI | $4.40 | +2.56% | 7.6M | -0.15 | -$29.99 | N/A |
| NKE | $44.03 | -0.36% | 65.1B | 28.97 | $1.52 | +3.68% |
| DECK | $101.64 | +3.39% | 14.8B | 14.44 | $7.04 | N/A |
| SKX | $63.13 | -0.11% | 9.5B | 14.41 | $4.38 | N/A |
| BIRK | $35.19 | +1.65% | 6.5B | 14.97 | $2.35 | N/A |
| CROX | $89.01 | +6.39% | 4.6B | -59.34 | -$1.50 | N/A |
| SHOO | $35.21 | +3.59% | 2.6B | 55.89 | $0.63 | +2.39% |
| WINA | $421.87 | -1.99% | 1.5B | 37.27 | $11.32 | +3.26% |
| WWW | $15.83 | -0.75% | 1.3B | 13.89 | $1.14 | +2.53% |
| CAL | $11.10 | +3.35% | 375.6M | -52.76 | -$0.21 | +2.54% |
Stock Comparison
FWDI vs NKE Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while NKE trades at $44.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 28.97. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check NKE's competition here
FWDI vs DECK Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, DECK has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while DECK trades at $101.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas DECK's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to DECK's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to DECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check DECK's competition here
FWDI vs SKX Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while SKX trades at $63.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check SKX's competition here
FWDI vs BIRK Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while BIRK trades at $35.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 14.97. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check BIRK's competition here
FWDI vs CROX Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while CROX trades at $89.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is -59.34. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CROX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check CROX's competition here
FWDI vs SHOO Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while SHOO trades at $35.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 55.89. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check SHOO's competition here
FWDI vs WINA Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while WINA trades at $421.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to WINA's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to WINA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check WINA's competition here
FWDI vs WWW Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while WWW trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check WWW's competition here
FWDI vs CAL Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 375.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while CAL trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is -52.76. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to CAL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check CAL's competition here
FWDI vs WEYS Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 306.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while WEYS trades at $32.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check WEYS's competition here
FWDI vs RCKY Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 295.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while RCKY trades at $39.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check RCKY's competition here
FWDI vs MAMK Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, MAMK has a market cap of 201.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while MAMK trades at $13.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas MAMK's P/E ratio is 216.67. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to MAMK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to MAMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check MAMK's competition here
FWDI vs VRA Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 98.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while VRA trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check VRA's competition here
FWDI vs SORA Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, SORA has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while SORA trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas SORA's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to SORA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to SORA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check SORA's competition here
FWDI vs FORD Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while FORD trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check FORD's competition here
FWDI vs AREBW Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while AREBW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +40.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is more volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check AREBW's competition here
FWDI vs AREB Comparison April 2026
FWDI plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FWDI stands at 7.6M. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, FWDI is priced at $4.40, while AREB trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FWDI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.15, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FWDI's ROE is -1.28%, compared to AREB's ROE of +40.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FWDI is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FWDI.Check AREB's competition here