FirstService Corporation
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FSV
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for FSV
FirstService Corporation (FSV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FSV) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSV | $139.72 | +1.13% | 6.4B | 44.08 | $3.17 | +0.81% |
| CBRE | $136.60 | +1.57% | 40.7B | 35.48 | $3.85 | N/A |
| CSGP | $39.95 | +0.81% | 16.9B | 1997.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| BEKE | $14.81 | -0.20% | 16.8B | 40.03 | $0.37 | +2.43% |
| JLL | $306.05 | +0.10% | 14.4B | 18.67 | $16.39 | N/A |
| BPYPP | $16.01 | -0.38% | 6.6B | 7.29 | $2.20 | +10.52% |
| BPYPO | $15.15 | +0.66% | 6.2B | 6.90 | $2.20 | +10.52% |
| BPYPN | $13.87 | +1.09% | 5.7B | 6.32 | $2.20 | +10.52% |
| CIGI | $107.59 | +0.68% | 5.4B | 53.26 | $2.02 | +0.28% |
| OPEN | $4.74 | +3.72% | 3.6B | -2.79 | -$1.70 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FSV vs CBRE Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CBRE trades at $136.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CBRE's competition here
FSV vs CSGP Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CSGP trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 1997.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CSGP's competition here
FSV vs BEKE Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while BEKE trades at $14.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BEKE's competition here
FSV vs JLL Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while JLL trades at $306.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check JLL's competition here
FSV vs BPYPP Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while BPYPP trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPP's competition here
FSV vs BPYPO Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while BPYPO trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPO's competition here
FSV vs BPYPN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while BPYPN trades at $13.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPN's competition here
FSV vs CIGI Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CIGI trades at $107.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 53.26. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIGI's competition here
FSV vs OPEN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while OPEN trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPEN's competition here
FSV vs TCN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCN's competition here
FSV vs CWK Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CWK trades at $12.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CWK's competition here
FSV vs NMRK Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while NMRK trades at $14.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 21.51. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NMRK's competition here
FSV vs HOUS Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while HOUS trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -15.47. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HOUS's competition here
FSV vs HBNB Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, HBNB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while HBNB trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas HBNB's P/E ratio is -111.07. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HBNB's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to HBNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HBNB's competition here
FSV vs KW Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while KW trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -38.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check KW's competition here
FSV vs RDFN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RDFN's competition here
FSV vs RLGY Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RLGY's competition here
FSV vs PGRU Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check PGRU's competition here
FSV vs MMI Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while MMI trades at $26.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -526.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MMI's competition here
FSV vs EXPI Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 951.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while EXPI trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -42.21. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check EXPI's competition here
FSV vs INDT Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check INDT's competition here
FSV vs QK Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check QK's competition here
FSV vs REAX Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 537.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while REAX trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -63.25. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check REAX's competition here
FSV vs RMR Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 496.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while RMR trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMR's competition here
FSV vs FRPH Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 421.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while FRPH trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 88.24. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FRPH's competition here
FSV vs MLP Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while MLP trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -29.65. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MLP's competition here
FSV vs TCI Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 305.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while TCI trades at $35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCI's competition here
FSV vs SEG Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 281.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while SEG trades at $22.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SEG's competition here
FSV vs FLJ Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FLJ's competition here
FSV vs CIAN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIAN's competition here
FSV vs OPAD-WT Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
FSV vs NEN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 203.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while NEN trades at $58.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 34.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NEN's competition here
FSV vs DOUG Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while DOUG trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOUG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOUG's competition here
FSV vs LODE Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LODE trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LODE's competition here
FSV vs RMAX Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 115.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while RMAX trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 14.30. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMAX's competition here
FSV vs STHO Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while STHO trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check STHO's competition here
FSV vs DOMA Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOMA's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA's competition here
FSV vs MAYS Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 80.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while MAYS trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -95.24. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MAYS's competition here
FSV vs ASPS Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 76.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while ASPS trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is 45.47. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASPS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ASPS's competition here
FSV vs RFL Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while RFL trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RFL's competition here
FSV vs WE Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE's competition here
FSV vs XHG Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while XHG trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check XHG's competition here
FSV vs CHG Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHG's ROE of +9.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CHG's competition here
FSV vs OMH Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while OMH trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OMH's competition here
FSV vs OPAD Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while OPAD trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD's competition here
FSV vs FTHM Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while FTHM trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FTHM's competition here
FSV vs LHAI Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LHAI has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LHAI trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LHAI's P/E ratio is 39.33. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LHAI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LHAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LHAI's competition here
FSV vs GYRO Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 17.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while GYRO trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GYRO's competition here
FSV vs WETH Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while WETH trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WETH's competition here
FSV vs LGPS Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LGPS trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 2.83. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LGPS's competition here
FSV vs LEJU Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LEJU's competition here
FSV vs AIRE Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 11.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while AIRE trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AIRE's competition here
FSV vs DUO Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while DUO trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is -2.02. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DUO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DUO's competition here
FSV vs AVCO Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVCO's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AVCO's competition here
FSV vs GBR Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while GBR trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -84.12. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GBR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GBR's competition here
FSV vs MDJH Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MDJH's competition here
FSV vs ALBT Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while ALBT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ALBT's ROE of +11.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ALBT's competition here
FSV vs SFRWW Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFRWW's competition here
FSV vs SFR Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFR's competition here
FSV vs UK Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 920.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while UK trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UK's competition here
FSV vs UOKA Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 604.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while UOKA trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UOKA's competition here
FSV vs LRHC Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 300.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LRHC trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LRHC's competition here
FSV vs UKOMW Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 186.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while UKOMW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UKOMW's competition here
FSV vs BPY Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPY's competition here
FSV vs LMRK Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRK's competition here
FSV vs LMRKP Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKP's competition here
FSV vs OBAS Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OBAS's competition here
FSV vs LMRKO Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKO's competition here
FSV vs WE-WT Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, WE-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while WE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas WE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WE-WT's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE-WT's competition here
FSV vs LMRKN Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKN's competition here
FSV vs CTC Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, CTC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while CTC trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas CTC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to CTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CTC's competition here
FSV vs DOMA-WT Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, DOMA-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while DOMA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas DOMA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DOMA-WT's ROE of -4.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA-WT's competition here
FSV vs NTP Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NTP's competition here
FSV vs IRCP Comparison April 2026
FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 6.4B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $139.72, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 44.08, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check IRCP's competition here