FirstService Corporation

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while CBRE trades at $158.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 44.51. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CBRE's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while CSGP trades at $87.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 338.35. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CSGP's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while JLL trades at $293.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check JLL's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while CIGI trades at $162.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 72.70. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIGI's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while BEKE trades at $18.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 34.70. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BEKE's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while BPYPP trades at $14.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.83. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPP's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while BPYPO trades at $14.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPO's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while BPYPN trades at $13.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPYPN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while CWK trades at $14.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CWK's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while NMRK trades at $17.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NMRK's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while TCN trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while OPEN trades at $3.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -7.07. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPEN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while EXPI trades at $10.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -54.84. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check EXPI's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while RDFN trades at $11.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RDFN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while RLGY trades at $12.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RLGY's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while MMI trades at $30.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -96.62. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MMI's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while KW trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -12.26. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check KW's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while PGRU trades at $6.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check PGRU's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 921.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while REAX trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -63.86. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check REAX's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while INDT trades at $66.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check INDT's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while QK trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check QK's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 634.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while HOUS trades at $5.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -5.84. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check HOUS's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while RMR trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMR's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 497M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while FRPH trades at $26.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 92.89. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FRPH's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 394.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while TCI trades at $45.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 60.14. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check TCI's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 345.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while MLP trades at $17.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.31. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MLP's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 329.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while SEG trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SEG's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while FLJ trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FLJ's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while NEN trades at $71.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NEN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while CIAN trades at $3.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CIAN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD-WT's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 212M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while DOUG trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOUG's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while RMAX trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RMAX's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 107.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while STHO trades at $8.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check STHO's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while ASPS trades at $9.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ASPS's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while DOMA trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DOMA's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 81.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LODE trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LODE's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 75.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while MAYS trades at $37.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1250.00. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MAYS's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while RFL trades at $1.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check RFL's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while OPAD trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OPAD's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while WE trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WE's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while CHG trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHG's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check CHG's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 32.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while FTHM trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check FTHM's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while AIRE trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AIRE's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while OMH trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OMH's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LGPS trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LGPS's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while GYRO trades at $10.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 47.11. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GYRO's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LEJU trades at $1.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LEJU's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while DUO trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check DUO's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while WETH trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.23. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check WETH's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while ALBT trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check ALBT's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LRHC trades at $5.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LRHC's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while AVCO trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check AVCO's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while GBR trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -27.75. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check GBR's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while UOKA trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UOKA's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while MDJH trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check MDJH's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while UK trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UK's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while SFR trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFR's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check SFRWW's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check UKOMW's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while XHG trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check XHG's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while OBAS trades at $12.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check OBAS's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKP's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while BPY trades at $18.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check BPY's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while NTP trades at $4.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check NTP's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while IRCP trades at $2.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check IRCP's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKN's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRKO's competition here

FSV plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FSV stands at 9.1B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSV is priced at $199.65, while LMRK trades at $16.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FSV currently has a P/E ratio of 63.99, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSV's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSV is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSV.Check LMRK's competition here