Fisker Inc.
Fisker Inc. FSR Peers
See (FSR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSR | $0.09 | -28.17% | 52.8M | -0.04 | -$2.22 | N/A |
| TSLA | $321.14 | -1.42% | 1T | 186.08 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $173.33 | +1.58% | 229.6B | 7.16 | $24.59 | +3.08% |
| RACE | $490.61 | +2.74% | 87.6B | 48.65 | $10.10 | +0.69% |
| GM | $49.18 | +0.03% | 47.7B | 6.94 | $7.16 | +1.03% |
| F | $10.74 | +0.99% | 42.2B | 8.64 | $1.25 | +6.98% |
| F-PC | $21.19 | -0.70% | 42.2B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| F-PD | $22.67 | -0.40% | 42B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| F-PB | $21.40 | -0.49% | 41.8B | N/A | N/A | +6.98% |
| STLA | $10.06 | +1.31% | 29.2B | 4.83 | $2.11 | +7.60% |
Stock Comparison
FSR vs TSLA Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while TSLA trades at $321.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 186.08. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs TM Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 229.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while TM trades at $173.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs RACE Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while RACE trades at $490.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 48.65. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs GM Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while GM trades at $49.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs F Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while F trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs F-PC Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while F-PC trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs F-PD Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while F-PD trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs F-PB Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while F-PB trades at $21.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs STLA Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while STLA trades at $10.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.83. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs XPEV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while XPEV trades at $17.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -24.17. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs RIVN Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while RIVN trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs HMC Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while HMC trades at $29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs LI Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while LI trades at $27.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 25.92. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs VFS Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while VFS trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.74. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs NIO Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while NIO trades at $3.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ZK Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ZK trades at $25.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs LCID Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while LCID trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs PSNY Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while PSNY trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs LOT Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while LOT trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs BLBD Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while BLBD trades at $43.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs LVWR Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 875.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while LVWR trades at $4.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs NAKD Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs VFSWW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 643.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while VFSWW trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs PSNYW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 295.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while PSNYW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs NIU Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while NIU trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -10.97. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs FFAI Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 143.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while FFAI trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.23. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs FFIEW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs FFIE Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs LOTWW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 71.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while LOTWW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs CJET Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while CJET trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs AYRO Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while AYRO trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs FLYE Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 48.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while FLYE trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs CENN Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while CENN trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs SOLO Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs RIDE Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ECDAW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs GP Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while GP trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ECDA Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ECDA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs WKHS Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while WKHS trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs PEV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ARVL Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs SVMH Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs AIEV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while AIEV trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs GOEV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs HYZN Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs LOBO Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while LOBO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs EVTV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while EVTV trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs DMN Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs VLCN Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while VLCN trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs EGOX Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs FFAIW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while FFAIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs VEV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ZAPP Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs MULN Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while MULN trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs GOEVW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs TTM Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ADOM Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs PTRA Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs SOLOW Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs ELMS Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while ELMS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.
FSR vs SEV Comparison
FSR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FSR stands at 52.8M. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FSR is priced at $0.09, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FSR currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FSR's ROE is -2.72%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FSR is less volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FSR.