Forterra, Inc.
Forterra, Inc. (FRTA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FRTA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRTA | $24.00 | +0.00% | 0 | 14.37 | $1.67 | N/A |
| TT | $422.12 | +0.07% | 93.7B | 32.12 | $13.15 | +0.91% |
| JCI | $131.85 | +0.69% | 79.7B | 43.68 | $2.98 | +1.18% |
| CARR | $55.99 | -0.89% | 46.5B | 32.93 | $1.69 | +1.63% |
| LII | $479.60 | -0.56% | 16.9B | 21.11 | $22.78 | +1.05% |
| CSL | $335.08 | -2.42% | 14.3B | 19.88 | $17.16 | +1.26% |
| MAS | $62.12 | +2.41% | 12.5B | 15.94 | $3.86 | +2.03% |
| WMS | $140.19 | +0.83% | 10.7B | 22.84 | $6.01 | +0.52% |
| BLDR | $87.29 | +0.79% | 9.7B | 22.65 | $3.89 | N/A |
| OC | $107.80 | +4.61% | 8.8B | -47.54 | -$2.24 | +2.78% |
Stock Comparison
FRTA vs TT Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, TT has a market cap of 93.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while TT trades at $422.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas TT's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TT's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to TT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check TT's competition here
FRTA vs JCI Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, JCI has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while JCI trades at $131.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas JCI's P/E ratio is 43.68. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JCI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to JCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check JCI's competition here
FRTA vs CARR Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, CARR has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while CARR trades at $55.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas CARR's P/E ratio is 32.93. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CARR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to CARR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check CARR's competition here
FRTA vs LII Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, LII has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while LII trades at $479.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas LII's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to LII's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to LII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check LII's competition here
FRTA vs CSL Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, CSL has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while CSL trades at $335.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas CSL's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CSL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to CSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check CSL's competition here
FRTA vs MAS Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while MAS trades at $62.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 15.94. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check MAS's competition here
FRTA vs WMS Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, WMS has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while WMS trades at $140.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas WMS's P/E ratio is 22.84. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to WMS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to WMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check WMS's competition here
FRTA vs BLDR Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, BLDR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while BLDR trades at $87.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas BLDR's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BLDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to BLDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check BLDR's competition here
FRTA vs OC Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, OC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while OC trades at $107.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas OC's P/E ratio is -47.54. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to OC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to OC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check OC's competition here
FRTA vs FBHS Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, FBHS has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while FBHS trades at $61.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas FBHS's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FBHS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to FBHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check FBHS's competition here
FRTA vs AZEK Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AZEK has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AZEK trades at $54.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AZEK's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AZEK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AZEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AZEK's competition here
FRTA vs BECN Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, BECN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while BECN trades at $124.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas BECN's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BECN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to BECN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check BECN's competition here
FRTA vs SSD Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, SSD has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while SSD trades at $177.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas SSD's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SSD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to SSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check SSD's competition here
FRTA vs AWI Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AWI has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AWI trades at $167.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AWI's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AWI's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AWI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AWI's competition here
FRTA vs AAON Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AAON has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AAON trades at $81.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AAON's P/E ratio is 65.04. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AAON's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AAON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AAON's competition here
FRTA vs FBIN Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, FBIN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while FBIN trades at $44.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas FBIN's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to FBIN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to FBIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check FBIN's competition here
FRTA vs GMS Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, GMS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while GMS trades at $109.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas GMS's P/E ratio is 41.81. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to GMS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to GMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check GMS's competition here
FRTA vs TREX Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, TREX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while TREX trades at $37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas TREX's P/E ratio is 20.60. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to TREX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to TREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check TREX's competition here
FRTA vs DOOR Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, DOOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while DOOR trades at $132.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas DOOR's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to DOOR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to DOOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check DOOR's competition here
FRTA vs PGTI Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, PGTI has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while PGTI trades at $42.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas PGTI's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PGTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is more volatile compared to PGTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check PGTI's competition here
FRTA vs ROCK Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, ROCK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while ROCK trades at $41.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas ROCK's P/E ratio is 9.25. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ROCK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to ROCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check ROCK's competition here
FRTA vs NX Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, NX has a market cap of 775M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while NX trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas NX's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to NX's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to NX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check NX's competition here
FRTA vs APOG Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, APOG has a market cap of 715.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while APOG trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas APOG's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to APOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to APOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check APOG's competition here
FRTA vs JBI Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, JBI has a market cap of 715.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while JBI trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas JBI's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JBI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to JBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check JBI's competition here
FRTA vs SWIM Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, SWIM has a market cap of 702.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while SWIM trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas SWIM's P/E ratio is 66.89. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SWIM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to SWIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check SWIM's competition here
FRTA vs BXC Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, BXC has a market cap of 387.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while BXC trades at $50.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas BXC's P/E ratio is 2462.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to BXC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to BXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check BXC's competition here
FRTA vs PHOE Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, PHOE has a market cap of 344.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while PHOE trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas PHOE's P/E ratio is 318.80. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PHOE's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to PHOE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check PHOE's competition here
FRTA vs ASPN Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, ASPN has a market cap of 302.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while ASPN trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas ASPN's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ASPN's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to ASPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check ASPN's competition here
FRTA vs PPIH Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, PPIH has a market cap of 227.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while PPIH trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas PPIH's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to PPIH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to PPIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check PPIH's competition here
FRTA vs JELD Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, JELD has a market cap of 128.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while JELD trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas JELD's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to JELD's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to JELD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check JELD's competition here
FRTA vs APT Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, APT has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while APT trades at $4.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas APT's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to APT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to APT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check APT's competition here
FRTA vs AIRJW Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AIRJW has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AIRJW trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AIRJW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AIRJW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AIRJW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AIRJW's competition here
FRTA vs SMJF Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, SMJF has a market cap of 43.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while SMJF trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas SMJF's P/E ratio is 99.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to SMJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to SMJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check SMJF's competition here
FRTA vs CSTE Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, CSTE has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while CSTE trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas CSTE's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to CSTE's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to CSTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check CSTE's competition here
FRTA vs ILAG Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, ILAG has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while ILAG trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas ILAG's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to ILAG's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to ILAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check ILAG's competition here
FRTA vs VIEW Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, VIEW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while VIEW trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas VIEW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIEW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to VIEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check VIEW's competition here
FRTA vs AEHL Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AEHL has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AEHL trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AEHL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AEHL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AEHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AEHL's competition here
FRTA vs VIEWW Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, VIEWW has a market cap of 6.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while VIEWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas VIEWW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to VIEWW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to VIEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check VIEWW's competition here
FRTA vs AFI Comparison March 2026
FRTA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FRTA stands at 0. In comparison, AFI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FRTA is priced at $24.00, while AFI trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FRTA currently has a P/E ratio of 14.37, whereas AFI's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FRTA's ROE is +0.45%, compared to AFI's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FRTA is less volatile compared to AFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FRTA.Check AFI's competition here