Forrester Research, Inc.
Forrester Research, Inc. (FORR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FORR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORR | $10.26 | +0.98% | 190.1M | -2.16 | -$4.62 | N/A |
| VRSK | $264.98 | +0.17% | 37B | 41.22 | $6.43 | +0.63% |
| EFX | $240.58 | -0.55% | 29.7B | 46.75 | $5.13 | +0.69% |
| TRU | $90.90 | +0.32% | 17.6B | 45.36 | $1.99 | +0.48% |
| BAH | $111.87 | +0.97% | 13.6B | 13.56 | $8.14 | +1.91% |
| FCN | $168.02 | -0.12% | 5.4B | 23.55 | $7.11 | N/A |
| EXPO | $71.49 | +0.31% | 3.6B | 35.51 | $1.99 | +1.64% |
| HURN | $128.91 | -2.14% | 2.3B | 23.25 | $5.72 | N/A |
| ICFI | $90.65 | -1.76% | 1.7B | 16.52 | $5.74 | +0.59% |
| CRAI | $188.87 | +0.92% | 1.2B | 22.60 | $8.25 | +1.02% |
Stock Comparison
FORR vs VRSK Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while VRSK trades at $264.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +4.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check VRSK's competition here
FORR vs EFX Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while EFX trades at $240.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 46.75. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check EFX's competition here
FORR vs TRU Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while TRU trades at $90.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 45.36. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check TRU's competition here
FORR vs BAH Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while BAH trades at $111.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check BAH's competition here
FORR vs FCN Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while FCN trades at $168.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 23.55. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check FCN's competition here
FORR vs EXPO Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while EXPO trades at $71.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 35.51. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check EXPO's competition here
FORR vs HURN Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while HURN trades at $128.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check HURN's competition here
FORR vs ICFI Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while ICFI trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check ICFI's competition here
FORR vs CRAI Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while CRAI trades at $188.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check CRAI's competition here
FORR vs SBC Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 447.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while SBC trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check SBC's competition here
FORR vs FC Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 237.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while FC trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 24.13. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check FC's competition here
FORR vs RGP Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 153.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while RGP trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check RGP's competition here
FORR vs ROMA Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 150.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while ROMA trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check ROMA's competition here
FORR vs SDH Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check SDH's competition here
FORR vs AERTW Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 40.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while AERTW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +10.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check AERTW's competition here
FORR vs AERT Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while AERT trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -1.73. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to AERT's ROE of +10.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check AERT's competition here
FORR vs EPOW Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while EPOW trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check EPOW's competition here
FORR vs VCIG Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while VCIG trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check VCIG's competition here
FORR vs SBCWW Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while SBCWW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check SBCWW's competition here
FORR vs INTJ Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while INTJ trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 55.99. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check INTJ's competition here
FORR vs GRNQ Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while GRNQ trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check GRNQ's competition here
FORR vs NLSN Comparison August 2025
FORR plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FORR stands at 190.1M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FORR is priced at $10.26, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FORR currently has a P/E ratio of -2.16, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FORR's ROE is -0.42%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FORR is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FORR.Check NLSN's competition here