Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
Fidelity National Financial, Inc. (FNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNF | $50.20 | -1.10% | 13.6B | 22.71 | $2.21 | +4.02% |
| AIZ | $227.18 | -2.06% | 11.4B | 13.42 | $16.93 | +1.48% |
| FAF | $69.03 | -0.78% | 7B | 11.51 | $6.00 | +3.16% |
| ACT | $41.41 | -2.17% | 6B | 9.16 | $4.52 | +2.02% |
| MTG | $26.78 | -0.45% | 5.8B | 8.53 | $3.14 | +2.16% |
| ESNT | $59.51 | -1.33% | 5.8B | 8.62 | $6.90 | +2.07% |
| RYAN | $39.34 | -0.41% | 5.1B | 83.66 | $0.47 | +1.24% |
| RDN | $34.22 | -1.38% | 4.7B | 7.79 | $4.39 | +2.96% |
| AGO | $86.70 | -0.94% | 4B | 10.63 | $8.16 | +1.57% |
| NMIH | $38.70 | -1.35% | 3B | 7.87 | $4.92 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FNF vs AIZ Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while AIZ trades at $227.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check AIZ's competition here
FNF vs FAF Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FAF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while FAF trades at $69.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas FAF's P/E ratio is 11.51. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to FAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check FAF's competition here
FNF vs ACT Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while ACT trades at $41.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check ACT's competition here
FNF vs MTG Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while MTG trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check MTG's competition here
FNF vs ESNT Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while ESNT trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is more volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check ESNT's competition here
FNF vs RYAN Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while RYAN trades at $39.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 83.66. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check RYAN's competition here
FNF vs RDN Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while RDN trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check RDN's competition here
FNF vs AGO Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while AGO trades at $86.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 10.63. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check AGO's competition here
FNF vs NMIH Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while NMIH trades at $38.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check NMIH's competition here
FNF vs TRUP Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while TRUP trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 62.54. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check TRUP's competition here
FNF vs EIG Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 916M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while EIG trades at $40.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 88.59. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check EIG's competition here
FNF vs HIPO Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 686.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while HIPO trades at $27.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 7.19. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check HIPO's competition here
FNF vs AMSF Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 658.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while AMSF trades at $34.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check AMSF's competition here
FNF vs TIPT Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while TIPT trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check TIPT's competition here
FNF vs ITIC Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 431.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while ITIC trades at $228.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check ITIC's competition here
FNF vs AMBC Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check AMBC's competition here
FNF vs MBI Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 338.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while MBI trades at $6.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check MBI's competition here
FNF vs JRVR Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 296M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while JRVR trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JRVR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check JRVR's competition here
FNF vs OSG Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 252.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while OSG trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check OSG's competition here
FNF vs AIFU Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 220.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while AIFU trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check AIFU's competition here
FNF vs ICCH Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check ICCH's competition here
FNF vs FBDC Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while FBDC trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check FBDC's competition here
FNF vs AMBC-WT Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
FNF vs PROS Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check PROS's competition here
FNF vs TIG Comparison March 2026
FNF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FNF stands at 13.6B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FNF is priced at $50.20, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FNF currently has a P/E ratio of 22.71, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, FNF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FNF is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FNF.Check TIG's competition here