Fly-E Group, Inc. Common Stock

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while TSLA trades at $335.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 194.45. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check TSLA's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 252.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while TM trades at $192.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check TM's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 82B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while RACE trades at $464.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 44.27. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check RACE's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 53.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while GM trades at $56.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 8.60. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check GM's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 44.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while F-PD trades at $23.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check F-PD's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, F has a market cap of 44.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while F trades at $11.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas F's P/E ratio is 14.66. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to F's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check F's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 44.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while F-PB trades at $22.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check F-PB's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while F-PC trades at $22.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check F-PC's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while STLA trades at $9.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is -10.53. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to STLA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check STLA's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while LI trades at $23.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check LI's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while XPEV trades at $19.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -26.29. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check XPEV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while HMC trades at $33.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 11.44. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check HMC's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while RIVN trades at $12.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check RIVN's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while NIO trades at $4.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check NIO's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while VFS trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.73. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check VFS's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ZK trades at $29.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -23.45. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ZK's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while LCID trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check LCID's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while PSNY trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check PSNY's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while BLBD trades at $56.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check BLBD's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while LOT trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LOT's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check LOT's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while LVWR trades at $3.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -8.71. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check LVWR's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while NAKD trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check NAKD's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 608.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while VFSWW trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check VFSWW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 500.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while VLCN trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check VLCN's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while NIU trades at $5.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -19.19. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check NIU's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 337.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while PSNYW trades at $0.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check PSNYW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 270.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while FFAI trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check FFAI's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while FFIE trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check FFIE's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check FFIEW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 67.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check LOTWW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while FSR trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check FSR's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while MULN trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to MULN's ROE of +10.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check MULN's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 48.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while CJET trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check CJET's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 28.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while CENN trades at $0.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check CENN's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while SOLO trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check SOLO's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while RIDE trades at $2.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check RIDE's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while WKHS trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check WKHS's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while GP trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GP's ROE of -5.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check GP's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ECDAW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while PEV trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PEV's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check PEV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ARVL trades at $0.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ARVL's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while SVMH trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check SVMH's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while LOBO trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check LOBO's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ECDA trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ECDA's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while EVTV trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check EVTV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while GOEV trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check GOEV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while HYZN trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check HYZN's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while FFAIW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check FFAIW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while AYRO trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check AYRO's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while DMN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to DMN's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check DMN's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while AIEV trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check AIEV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while EGOX trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check EGOX's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while VEV trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check VEV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ZAPP's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check GOEVW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check SOLOW's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ADOM trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ADOM's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while PTRA trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check PTRA's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, ELMS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while ELMS trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas ELMS's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to ELMS's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is less volatile compared to ELMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check ELMS's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while SEV trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check SEV's competition here

FLYE plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLYE stands at 18.5M. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLYE is priced at $7.76, while TTM trades at $25.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLYE currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLYE's ROE is -0.41%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FLYE is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLYE.Check TTM's competition here