Freehill Mining Limited
Freehill Mining Limited (FHS.AX) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FHS.AX) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHS.AX | A$0.00 | +0.00% | 13.7M | -0.40 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
| BHP.AX | A$39.90 | +0.08% | 204.1B | 11.66 | A$3.45 | +4.73% |
| RIO.AX | A$112.95 | +0.53% | 157.7B | 11.71 | A$9.70 | +5.41% |
| FMG.AX | A$18.58 | +0.38% | 58B | 9.67 | A$1.95 | +7.37% |
| S32.AX | A$2.97 | +0.00% | 13.6B | -37.75 | -A$0.08 | +3.31% |
| LYC.AX | A$11.90 | -2.14% | 11.8B | 252.40 | A$0.05 | N/A |
| ATM.AX | A$1.14 | -1.30% | 6.9B | 10.50 | A$0.11 | +4.96% |
| MIN.AX | A$33.15 | -0.33% | 6.6B | -5.46 | -A$6.22 | N/A |
| AKE.AX | A$9.83 | -5.57% | 6.3B | 9.54 | A$1.03 | N/A |
| PLS.AX | A$1.71 | -3.39% | 6.2B | -193.00 | -A$0.01 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FHS.AX vs BHP.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BHP.AX has a market cap of 204.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BHP.AX trades at A$39.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BHP.AX's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BHP.AX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to BHP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check BHP.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs RIO.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, RIO.AX has a market cap of 157.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RIO.AX trades at A$112.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RIO.AX's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RIO.AX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to RIO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check RIO.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs FMG.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, FMG.AX has a market cap of 58B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FMG.AX trades at A$18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FMG.AX's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FMG.AX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to FMG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check FMG.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs S32.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, S32.AX has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while S32.AX trades at A$2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas S32.AX's P/E ratio is -37.75. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to S32.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to S32.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check S32.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LYC.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LYC.AX has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LYC.AX trades at A$11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LYC.AX's P/E ratio is 252.40. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LYC.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LYC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LYC.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ATM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ATM.AX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ATM.AX trades at A$1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ATM.AX's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ATM.AX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ATM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ATM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MIN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MIN.AX has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MIN.AX trades at A$33.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MIN.AX's P/E ratio is -5.46. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MIN.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MIN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AKE.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AKE.AX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AKE.AX trades at A$9.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AKE.AX's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AKE.AX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AKE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AKE.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs PLS.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PLS.AX has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PLS.AX trades at A$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PLS.AX's P/E ratio is -193.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLS.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to PLS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check PLS.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs IGO.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, IGO.AX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IGO.AX trades at A$4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IGO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.55. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IGO.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to IGO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check IGO.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs NIC.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, NIC.AX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NIC.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NIC.AX's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NIC.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to NIC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check NIC.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AVZ.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AVZ.AX has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AVZ.AX trades at A$0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AVZ.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AVZ.AX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AVZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AVZ.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ILU.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ILU.AX has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ILU.AX trades at A$5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ILU.AX's P/E ratio is 11.13. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ILU.AX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ILU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ILU.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs DRR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, DRR.AX has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while DRR.AX trades at A$4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DRR.AX's P/E ratio is 16.81. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DRR.AX's ROE of +1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to DRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check DRR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ADT.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ADT.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ADT.AX trades at A$5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ADT.AX's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ADT.AX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ADT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ADT.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LTR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LTR.AX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LTR.AX trades at A$0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LTR.AX's P/E ratio is -42.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LTR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LTR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LTR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs IPX.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, IPX.AX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while IPX.AX trades at A$5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IPX.AX's P/E ratio is -14.59. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to IPX.AX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to IPX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check IPX.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs PRN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PRN.AX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PRN.AX trades at A$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PRN.AX's P/E ratio is 21.33. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PRN.AX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to PRN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check PRN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AZS.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AZS.AX has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AZS.AX trades at A$3.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AZS.AX's P/E ratio is -28.42. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AZS.AX's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AZS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AZS.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs DVP.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, DVP.AX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while DVP.AX trades at A$4.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DVP.AX's P/E ratio is -142.33. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to DVP.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to DVP.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check DVP.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AII.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AII.AX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AII.AX trades at A$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AII.AX's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AII.AX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AII.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs A4N.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, A4N.AX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A4N.AX trades at A$0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas A4N.AX's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to A4N.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to A4N.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check A4N.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs BCI.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BCI.AX has a market cap of 996.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BCI.AX trades at A$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BCI.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BCI.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to BCI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check BCI.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs VUL.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, VUL.AX has a market cap of 869.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VUL.AX trades at A$3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VUL.AX's P/E ratio is -9.05. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VUL.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to VUL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check VUL.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MAH.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MAH.AX has a market cap of 770.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAH.AX trades at A$0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MAH.AX's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAH.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MAH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MAH.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs PMT.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PMT.AX has a market cap of 754.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PMT.AX trades at A$0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PMT.AX's P/E ratio is -46.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PMT.AX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to PMT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check PMT.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs BOE.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BOE.AX has a market cap of 753.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BOE.AX trades at A$1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BOE.AX's P/E ratio is -25.93. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BOE.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to BOE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check BOE.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MCR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MCR.AX has a market cap of 751.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MCR.AX trades at A$1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MCR.AX's P/E ratio is -12.59. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MCR.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MCR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MCR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs KLL.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, KLL.AX has a market cap of 727.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KLL.AX trades at A$7.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas KLL.AX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KLL.AX's ROE of +74.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is less volatile compared to KLL.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check KLL.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs FFM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, FFM.AX has a market cap of 709M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FFM.AX trades at A$1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FFM.AX's P/E ratio is -54.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FFM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to FFM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check FFM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs CHN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CHN.AX has a market cap of 638.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CHN.AX trades at A$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CHN.AX's P/E ratio is -27.33. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CHN.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to CHN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check CHN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LLL.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LLL.AX has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LLL.AX trades at A$0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LLL.AX's P/E ratio is -25.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LLL.AX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LLL.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs G6M.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, G6M.AX has a market cap of 548M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while G6M.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas G6M.AX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to G6M.AX's ROE of -19.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to G6M.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check G6M.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MLX.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MLX.AX has a market cap of 527.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MLX.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MLX.AX's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLX.AX's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MLX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MLX.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs CAY.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CAY.AX has a market cap of 490.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CAY.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CAY.AX's P/E ratio is -27.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CAY.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to CAY.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check CAY.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ARU.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ARU.AX has a market cap of 480.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ARU.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ARU.AX's P/E ratio is -9.75. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARU.AX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ARU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ARU.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LRS.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LRS.AX has a market cap of 477.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LRS.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LRS.AX's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LRS.AX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LRS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LRS.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs SVM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SVM.AX has a market cap of 465.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SVM.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SVM.AX's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SVM.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to SVM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check SVM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs JMS.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, JMS.AX has a market cap of 451M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while JMS.AX trades at A$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas JMS.AX's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to JMS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to JMS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check JMS.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MMI.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MMI.AX has a market cap of 439.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MMI.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MMI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.20. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MMI.AX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MMI.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MAU.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MAU.AX has a market cap of 421.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAU.AX trades at A$1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MAU.AX's P/E ratio is -26.17. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAU.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MAU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MAU.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MAUCA.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MAUCA.AX has a market cap of 413.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MAUCA.AX trades at A$1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MAUCA.AX's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MAUCA.AX's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MAUCA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MAUCA.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MEI.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MEI.AX has a market cap of 396.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MEI.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MEI.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MEI.AX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MEI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MEI.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LOT.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LOT.AX has a market cap of 379.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LOT.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LOT.AX's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LOT.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LOT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LOT.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs RXM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, RXM.AX has a market cap of 375.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RXM.AX trades at A$0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RXM.AX's P/E ratio is -23.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RXM.AX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to RXM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check RXM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LPI.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LPI.AX has a market cap of 365.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LPI.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LPI.AX's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LPI.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LPI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LPI.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs SYR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SYR.AX has a market cap of 358M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SYR.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SYR.AX's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYR.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to SYR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check SYR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AMI.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AMI.AX has a market cap of 330.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AMI.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AMI.AX's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AMI.AX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AMI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AMI.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs SYA.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SYA.AX has a market cap of 300.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SYA.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SYA.AX's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SYA.AX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to SYA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check SYA.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs BSE.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BSE.AX has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BSE.AX trades at A$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BSE.AX's P/E ratio is -4.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSE.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to BSE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check BSE.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs INR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, INR.AX has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while INR.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas INR.AX's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to INR.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to INR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check INR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs PLL.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PLL.AX has a market cap of 285.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PLL.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PLL.AX's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PLL.AX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to PLL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check PLL.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs NTU.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, NTU.AX has a market cap of 284.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NTU.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NTU.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NTU.AX's ROE of +54.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to NTU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check NTU.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs BNZ.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BNZ.AX has a market cap of 254.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BNZ.AX trades at A$0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BNZ.AX's P/E ratio is -24.62. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BNZ.AX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to BNZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check BNZ.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs RHK.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, RHK.AX has a market cap of 254M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RHK.AX trades at A$1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RHK.AX's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RHK.AX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to RHK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check RHK.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs SO4.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SO4.AX has a market cap of 253.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SO4.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SO4.AX's P/E ratio is -31.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SO4.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to SO4.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check SO4.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs KP2.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, KP2.AX has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while KP2.AX trades at A$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas KP2.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to KP2.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to KP2.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check KP2.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs NWC.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, NWC.AX has a market cap of 243.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NWC.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NWC.AX's P/E ratio is -6.70. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NWC.AX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to NWC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check NWC.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs OMH.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, OMH.AX has a market cap of 229.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while OMH.AX trades at A$0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OMH.AX's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to OMH.AX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to OMH.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check OMH.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs GRR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, GRR.AX has a market cap of 225.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GRR.AX trades at A$0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GRR.AX's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GRR.AX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to GRR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check GRR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs FEX.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, FEX.AX has a market cap of 222.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FEX.AX trades at A$0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FEX.AX's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FEX.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to FEX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check FEX.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs TVN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, TVN.AX has a market cap of 218.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TVN.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TVN.AX's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TVN.AX's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to TVN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check TVN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs RHI.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, RHI.AX has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RHI.AX trades at A$3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RHI.AX's P/E ratio is 1.38. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RHI.AX's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to RHI.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check RHI.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs CXO.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CXO.AX has a market cap of 214.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CXO.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CXO.AX's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CXO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to CXO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check CXO.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs TLG.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, TLG.AX has a market cap of 214M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while TLG.AX trades at A$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TLG.AX's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to TLG.AX's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to TLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check TLG.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs CTM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CTM.AX has a market cap of 208.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CTM.AX trades at A$0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CTM.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CTM.AX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to CTM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check CTM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ARR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ARR.AX has a market cap of 207.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ARR.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ARR.AX's P/E ratio is -37.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ARR.AX's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ARR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ARR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AIS.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AIS.AX has a market cap of 198.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AIS.AX trades at A$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AIS.AX's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AIS.AX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AIS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AIS.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AUT.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AUT.AX has a market cap of 180.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AUT.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AUT.AX's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUT.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AUT.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AUT.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs WA8.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, WA8.AX has a market cap of 178.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while WA8.AX trades at A$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas WA8.AX's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to WA8.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to WA8.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check WA8.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs AUE.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, AUE.AX has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while AUE.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AUE.AX's P/E ratio is -17.33. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to AUE.AX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to AUE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check AUE.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs RNU.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, RNU.AX has a market cap of 167.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while RNU.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RNU.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to RNU.AX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to RNU.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check RNU.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs QGL.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, QGL.AX has a market cap of 167.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while QGL.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas QGL.AX's P/E ratio is -24.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to QGL.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to QGL.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check QGL.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs VIA.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, VIA.AX has a market cap of 166.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while VIA.AX trades at A$2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VIA.AX's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to VIA.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is less volatile compared to VIA.AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check VIA.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ENR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ENR.AX has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ENR.AX trades at A$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ENR.AX's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ENR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ENR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ENR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs CII.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, CII.AX has a market cap of 148.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while CII.AX trades at A$1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CII.AX's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to CII.AX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to CII.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check CII.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LIN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LIN.AX has a market cap of 147.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LIN.AX trades at A$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LIN.AX's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LIN.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LIN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LIN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs EGR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, EGR.AX has a market cap of 147.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EGR.AX trades at A$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas EGR.AX's P/E ratio is -32.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EGR.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to EGR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check EGR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs LNR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, LNR.AX has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while LNR.AX trades at A$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LNR.AX's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to LNR.AX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to LNR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check LNR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs NCZ.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, NCZ.AX has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NCZ.AX trades at A$1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NCZ.AX's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NCZ.AX's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to NCZ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check NCZ.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ASN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ASN.AX has a market cap of 145.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ASN.AX trades at A$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ASN.AX's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASN.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ASN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ASN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs PEK.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PEK.AX has a market cap of 144.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PEK.AX trades at A$0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PEK.AX's P/E ratio is -8.37. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PEK.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to PEK.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check PEK.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs STA.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, STA.AX has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while STA.AX trades at A$0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas STA.AX's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STA.AX's ROE of -6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to STA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check STA.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs NMR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, NMR.AX has a market cap of 137M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NMR.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NMR.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NMR.AX's ROE of +20.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to NMR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check NMR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ESS.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ESS.AX has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ESS.AX trades at A$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ESS.AX's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ESS.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ESS.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ESS.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs GLN.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, GLN.AX has a market cap of 135M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while GLN.AX trades at A$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GLN.AX's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to GLN.AX's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to GLN.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check GLN.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ATR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ATR.AX has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ATR.AX trades at A$0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ATR.AX's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ATR.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ATR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ATR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ASM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ASM.AX has a market cap of 130.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ASM.AX trades at A$0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ASM.AX's P/E ratio is -3.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ASM.AX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ASM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ASM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs PSC.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, PSC.AX has a market cap of 129.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while PSC.AX trades at A$0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PSC.AX's P/E ratio is -9.25. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to PSC.AX's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to PSC.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check PSC.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs NVA.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, NVA.AX has a market cap of 128.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while NVA.AX trades at A$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NVA.AX's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to NVA.AX's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to NVA.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check NVA.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs STM.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, STM.AX has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while STM.AX trades at A$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas STM.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to STM.AX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to STM.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check STM.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs A1G.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, A1G.AX has a market cap of 118.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A1G.AX trades at A$0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas A1G.AX's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to A1G.AX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to A1G.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check A1G.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs A11.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, A11.AX has a market cap of 117.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while A11.AX trades at A$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas A11.AX's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to A11.AX's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to A11.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check A11.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs EUR.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, EUR.AX has a market cap of 117.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while EUR.AX trades at A$0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas EUR.AX's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to EUR.AX's ROE of -3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to EUR.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check EUR.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs BSX.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, BSX.AX has a market cap of 117.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while BSX.AX trades at A$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BSX.AX's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to BSX.AX's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to BSX.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check BSX.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs MLG.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, MLG.AX has a market cap of 114.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while MLG.AX trades at A$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MLG.AX's P/E ratio is 14.80. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to MLG.AX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to MLG.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check MLG.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs SGQ.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, SGQ.AX has a market cap of 111M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while SGQ.AX trades at A$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SGQ.AX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to SGQ.AX's ROE of -2.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to SGQ.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check SGQ.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs ZEO.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, ZEO.AX has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while ZEO.AX trades at A$0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ZEO.AX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to ZEO.AX's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to ZEO.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check ZEO.AX's competition here
FHS.AX vs FHE.AX Comparison August 2025
FHS.AX plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FHS.AX stands at 13.7M. In comparison, FHE.AX has a market cap of 110.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FHS.AX is priced at A$0.00, while FHE.AX trades at A$0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FHS.AX currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FHE.AX's P/E ratio is -5.37. In terms of profitability, FHS.AX's ROE is -0.08%, compared to FHE.AX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FHS.AX is more volatile compared to FHE.AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FHS.AX.Check FHE.AX's competition here