Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd.
Fuwei Films (Holdings) Co., Ltd. FFHL Peers
See (FFHL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Packaging & Containers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFHL | $8.30 | N/A | 695.42M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| IP | $50.13 | +1.13% | 26.46B | 42.85 | $1.17 | +3.67% |
| SW | $46.64 | +0.02% | 24.35B | 56.88 | $0.82 | +3.14% |
| BLL | $69.49 | -3.37% | 21.85B | 28.62 | $2.43 | +1.49% |
| AMCR | $9.44 | +1.40% | 21.76B | 16.86 | $0.56 | +5.35% |
| PKG | $194.27 | +1.85% | 17.48B | 20.32 | $9.56 | +2.57% |
| BALL | $53.78 | +0.77% | 14.92B | 30.56 | $1.76 | +1.49% |
| WRK | $51.51 | +3.54% | 13.30B | 42.57 | $1.21 | N/A |
| CCK | $99.40 | -0.18% | 11.57B | 21.42 | $4.64 | +1.02% |
| BERY | $67.58 | -2.93% | 7.83B | 14.95 | $4.52 | +1.70% |
Stock Comparison
FFHL vs IP Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, IP has a market cap of 26.46B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while IP trades at $50.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IP's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to IP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to IP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs SW Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, SW has a market cap of 24.35B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SW trades at $46.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SW's P/E ratio is 56.88. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to SW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to SW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs BLL Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, BLL has a market cap of 21.85B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while BLL trades at $69.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLL's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to BLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to BLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs AMCR Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, AMCR has a market cap of 21.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while AMCR trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMCR's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to AMCR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to AMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs PKG Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, PKG has a market cap of 17.48B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while PKG trades at $194.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PKG's P/E ratio is 20.32. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to PKG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to PKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs BALL Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, BALL has a market cap of 14.92B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while BALL trades at $53.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BALL's P/E ratio is 30.56. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to BALL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to BALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs WRK Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, WRK has a market cap of 13.30B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while WRK trades at $51.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRK's P/E ratio is 42.57. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to WRK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to WRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs CCK Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, CCK has a market cap of 11.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while CCK trades at $99.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CCK's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to CCK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to CCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs BERY Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, BERY has a market cap of 7.83B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while BERY trades at $67.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BERY's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to BERY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to BERY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs GPK Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, GPK has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while GPK trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPK's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to GPK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to GPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs SLGN Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, SLGN has a market cap of 5.24B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SLGN trades at $49.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLGN's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to SLGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to SLGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs REYN Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, REYN has a market cap of 4.86B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while REYN trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REYN's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to REYN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to REYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs SEE Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, SEE has a market cap of 4.75B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SEE trades at $32.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEE's P/E ratio is 15.69. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to SEE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to SEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs SON Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, SON has a market cap of 4.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while SON trades at $46.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SON's P/E ratio is 56.56. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to SON's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to SON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs PTVE Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, PTVE has a market cap of 3.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while PTVE trades at $18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PTVE's P/E ratio is -23.39. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to PTVE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to PTVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs GEF-B Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, GEF-B has a market cap of 2.80B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while GEF-B trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEF-B's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to GEF-B's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to GEF-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs GEF Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, GEF has a market cap of 2.76B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while GEF trades at $56.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEF's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to GEF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to GEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs AMBP Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, AMBP has a market cap of 2.32B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while AMBP trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMBP's P/E ratio is -97.00. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to AMBP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to AMBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs OI Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, OI has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while OI trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OI's P/E ratio is -10.70. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to OI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to OI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs TRS Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, TRS has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while TRS trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRS's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to TRS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to TRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs KRT Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, KRT has a market cap of 627.26M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while KRT trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KRT's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to KRT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to KRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs MYE Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, MYE has a market cap of 469.52M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while MYE trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MYE's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to MYE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to MYE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs PACK Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, PACK has a market cap of 312.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while PACK trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PACK's P/E ratio is -14.25. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to PACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to PACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs TUP Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, TUP has a market cap of 23.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while TUP trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TUP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to TUP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to TUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs YHGJ Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, YHGJ has a market cap of 23.31M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while YHGJ trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YHGJ's P/E ratio is -12.86. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to YHGJ's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to YHGJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs MGIH Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, MGIH has a market cap of 19.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while MGIH trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGIH's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to MGIH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is more volatile compared to MGIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs DSS Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, DSS has a market cap of 8.64M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while DSS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DSS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to DSS's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to DSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs OCTO Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, OCTO has a market cap of 4.23M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while OCTO trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OCTO's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to OCTO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to OCTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.
FFHL vs TYDE Comparison
FFHL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FFHL stands at 695.42M. In comparison, TYDE has a market cap of 3.80M. Regarding current trading prices, FFHL is priced at $8.30, while TYDE trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FFHL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TYDE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FFHL's ROE is -79.62%, compared to TYDE's ROE of +9.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FFHL is less volatile compared to TYDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FFHL.