FTI Consulting, Inc.

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while VRSK trades at $201.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check VRSK's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while EFX trades at $184.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EFX's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while TRU trades at $69.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check TRU's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while BAH trades at $78.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check BAH's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while EXPO trades at $67.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EXPO's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while HURN trades at $127.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check HURN's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while ICFI trades at $69.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN and ICFI have similar daily volatility (3.22).Check ICFI's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while CRAI trades at $155.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check CRAI's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 365.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while SBC trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 8.48. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check SBC's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 321.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while ROMA trades at $5.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check ROMA's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 174.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while EGG trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 312.50. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EGG's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while FC trades at $11.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -96.00. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check FC's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while RGP trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check RGP's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while FORR trades at $5.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check FORR's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check SDH's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check SBCWW's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while RYOJ trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is -17.54. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check RYOJ's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while AERT trades at $0.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check AERT's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while EPOW trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.13. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EPOW's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while GRNQ trades at $2.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -12.44. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check GRNQ's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 756.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while AERTW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check AERTW's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 215.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while INTJ trades at $6.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -20.61. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check INTJ's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 212.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while VCIG trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check VCIG's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while FGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FCN has daily volatility of 3.22 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $162.58, while NLSN trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.72, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check NLSN's competition here