FTI Consulting, Inc.
FTI Consulting, Inc. FCN Peers
See (FCN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCN | $161.82 | -0.67% | 5.55B | 22.14 | $7.31 | N/A |
| VRSK | $301.27 | -0.10% | 42.14B | 44.37 | $6.79 | +0.54% |
| EFX | $270.94 | -1.03% | 33.65B | 55.41 | $4.89 | +0.57% |
| TRU | $90.67 | -0.87% | 17.69B | 48.49 | $1.87 | +0.47% |
| BAH | $123.40 | -0.26% | 15.63B | 18.39 | $6.71 | +1.69% |
| EXPO | $77.74 | -1.77% | 3.95B | 38.11 | $2.04 | +1.46% |
| HURN | $146.54 | -2.18% | 2.53B | 22.04 | $6.65 | N/A |
| ICFI | $85.49 | -0.71% | 1.57B | 14.69 | $5.82 | +0.66% |
| CRAI | $187.07 | -1.53% | 1.27B | 25.25 | $7.41 | +0.96% |
| SBC | $3.36 | -4.00% | 348.13M | 7.00 | $0.48 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FCN vs VRSK Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 42.14B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while VRSK trades at $301.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 44.37. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +4.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs EFX Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 33.65B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while EFX trades at $270.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 55.41. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs TRU Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 17.69B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while TRU trades at $90.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 48.49. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs BAH Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 15.63B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while BAH trades at $123.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 18.39. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs EXPO Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.95B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while EXPO trades at $77.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs HURN Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.53B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while HURN trades at $146.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs ICFI Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.57B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while ICFI trades at $85.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs CRAI Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while CRAI trades at $187.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 25.25. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs SBC Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 348.13M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while SBC trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs FC Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 299.24M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while FC trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas FC's P/E ratio is 17.32. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs FORR Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 190.63M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while FORR trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs RGP Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 179.90M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while RGP trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs SDH Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 52.98M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs AERT Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 30.08M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while AERT trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AERT's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs ROMA Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 24.89M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while ROMA trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs EPOW Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 23.78M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while EPOW trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +439.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs SBCWW Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 18.65M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while SBCWW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs VCIG Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 11.70M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while VCIG trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs INTJ Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 7.92M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while INTJ trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INTJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs GRNQ Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 7.73M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while GRNQ trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.
FCN vs AERTW Comparison
FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.55B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 758674.00. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $161.82, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.14, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AERTW's ROE of -4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.