FTI Consulting, Inc.

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while VRSK trades at $191.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRSK's ROE of +3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check VRSK's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while EFX trades at $194.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 37.31. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EFX's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while TRU trades at $72.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 31.99. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check TRU's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while BAH trades at $75.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check BAH's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while EXPO trades at $70.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EXPO's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while HURN trades at $126.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check HURN's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while ICFI trades at $75.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.18. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check ICFI's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while CRAI trades at $156.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check CRAI's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 423.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while SBC trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check SBC's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while FC trades at $13.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -114.00. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check FC's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 153.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while ROMA trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -21.50. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check ROMA's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 151.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while EGG trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 60.11. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EGG's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 123.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while RGP trades at $3.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check RGP's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while FORR trades at $5.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check FORR's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while SDH trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check SDH's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 30.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while RYOJ trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check RYOJ's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while SBCWW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check SBCWW's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while EPOW trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check EPOW's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while AERT trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -4.07. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check AERT's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while GRNQ trades at $1.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check GRNQ's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while VCIG trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check VCIG's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while AERTW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check AERTW's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 225.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while INTJ trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -21.58. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check INTJ's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while FGO trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FCN has daily volatility of 3.11 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here

FCN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FCN stands at 5.2B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FCN is priced at $156.70, while NLSN trades at $27.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FCN currently has a P/E ratio of 20.52, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FCN's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FCN is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FCN.Check NLSN's competition here