Fanhua Inc.

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while MMC trades at $182.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check MMC's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 85.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while MRSH trades at $174.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check MRSH's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 69.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while AON trades at $323.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check AON's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 55.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while AJG trades at $217.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check AJG's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while WTW trades at $288.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check WTW's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while WLTW trades at $231.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check WLTW's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while BRO trades at $65.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 20.87. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check BRO's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while ERIE trades at $249.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check ERIE's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while ARX trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check ARX's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while CRVL trades at $54.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check CRVL's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while BRP trades at $32.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check BRP's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while BWIN trades at $22.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -44.70. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check BWIN's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRD-A has a market cap of 503.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while CRD-A trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas CRD-A's P/E ratio is 26.15. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRD-A's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to CRD-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check CRD-A's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 500.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while CRD-B trades at $10.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check CRD-B's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while TWFG trades at $18.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check TWFG's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 106.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while SLQT trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -20.16. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check SLQT's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 39.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while EHTH trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -3.71. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EHTH's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while GOCO trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check GOCO's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while ZBAO trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check ZBAO's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while EZRA trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EZRA's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while RELI trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check RELI's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 721.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while HUIZ trades at $1.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check HUIZ's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EZRAW's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while RELIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check RELIW's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 4.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while TIRX trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check TIRX's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, EFM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while EFM trades at $25.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas EFM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EFM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to EFM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check EFM's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, MER has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while MER trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas MER's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MER's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is more volatile compared to MER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check MER's competition here

FANH plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FANH stands at 1.7B. In comparison, GIWWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FANH is priced at $1.53, while GIWWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FANH currently has a P/E ratio of 3.92, whereas GIWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FANH's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GIWWW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FANH is less volatile compared to GIWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FANH.Check GIWWW's competition here