First American Financial Corporation
First American Financial Corporation (FAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAF | $70.33 | +0.31% | 7.2B | 11.72 | $6.00 | +3.12% |
| FNF | $51.65 | -2.34% | 14B | 23.37 | $2.21 | +3.82% |
| AIZ | $233.51 | +1.71% | 11.7B | 13.80 | $16.92 | +1.47% |
| ACT | $42.44 | +1.43% | 6.1B | 9.39 | $4.52 | +2.01% |
| ESNT | $61.34 | +0.81% | 5.9B | 8.89 | $6.90 | +2.04% |
| MTG | $27.12 | +2.21% | 5.9B | 8.64 | $3.14 | +2.19% |
| RYAN | $40.18 | +2.11% | 5.2B | 85.49 | $0.47 | +1.24% |
| RDN | $34.93 | +1.19% | 4.8B | 7.96 | $4.39 | +2.96% |
| AGO | $87.39 | +1.37% | 4B | 10.71 | $8.16 | +1.59% |
| NMIH | $39.63 | +0.81% | 3B | 8.05 | $4.92 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FAF vs FNF Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FNF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while FNF trades at $51.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas FNF's P/E ratio is 23.37. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to FNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check FNF's competition here
FAF vs AIZ Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AIZ has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while AIZ trades at $233.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AIZ's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIZ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AIZ's competition here
FAF vs ACT Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ACT has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while ACT trades at $42.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ACT's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to ACT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ACT's competition here
FAF vs ESNT Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ESNT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while ESNT trades at $61.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ESNT's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ESNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to ESNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ESNT's competition here
FAF vs MTG Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MTG has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while MTG trades at $27.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas MTG's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MTG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to MTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check MTG's competition here
FAF vs RYAN Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RYAN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while RYAN trades at $40.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas RYAN's P/E ratio is 85.49. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RYAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to RYAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check RYAN's competition here
FAF vs RDN Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, RDN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while RDN trades at $34.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas RDN's P/E ratio is 7.96. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to RDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check RDN's competition here
FAF vs AGO Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AGO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while AGO trades at $87.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AGO's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AGO's competition here
FAF vs NMIH Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NMIH has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while NMIH trades at $39.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas NMIH's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMIH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to NMIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check NMIH's competition here
FAF vs TRUP Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TRUP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while TRUP trades at $26.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas TRUP's P/E ratio is 59.36. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRUP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to TRUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check TRUP's competition here
FAF vs EIG Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, EIG has a market cap of 935.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while EIG trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas EIG's P/E ratio is 90.48. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EIG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to EIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check EIG's competition here
FAF vs HIPO Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, HIPO has a market cap of 717.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while HIPO trades at $28.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas HIPO's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIPO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to HIPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check HIPO's competition here
FAF vs TIPT Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TIPT has a market cap of 649.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while TIPT trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas TIPT's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIPT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to TIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check TIPT's competition here
FAF vs AMSF Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMSF has a market cap of 638.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while AMSF trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AMSF's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMSF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AMSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AMSF's competition here
FAF vs ITIC Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ITIC has a market cap of 440.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while ITIC trades at $233.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ITIC's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITIC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to ITIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ITIC's competition here
FAF vs AMBC Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMBC has a market cap of 397.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while AMBC trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AMBC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBC's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to AMBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AMBC's competition here
FAF vs MBI Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MBI has a market cap of 335.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while MBI trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas MBI's P/E ratio is -1.85. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to MBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check MBI's competition here
FAF vs JRVR Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, JRVR has a market cap of 327.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while JRVR trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas JRVR's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JRVR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to JRVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check JRVR's competition here
FAF vs OSG Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, OSG has a market cap of 250.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while OSG trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas OSG's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OSG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to OSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check OSG's competition here
FAF vs AIFU Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AIFU has a market cap of 230.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while AIFU trades at $1.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AIFU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIFU's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AIFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AIFU's competition here
FAF vs ICCH Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ICCH has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while ICCH trades at $23.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas ICCH's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICCH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to ICCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check ICCH's competition here
FAF vs FBDC Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FBDC has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while FBDC trades at $17.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas FBDC's P/E ratio is 9.27. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FBDC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to FBDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check FBDC's competition here
FAF vs AMBC-WT Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AMBC-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while AMBC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas AMBC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBC-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is less volatile compared to AMBC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check AMBC-WT's competition here
FAF vs PROS Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PROS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while PROS trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas PROS's P/E ratio is 2.03. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PROS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to PROS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check PROS's competition here
FAF vs TIG Comparison March 2026
FAF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAF stands at 7.2B. In comparison, TIG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FAF is priced at $70.33, while TIG trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.72, whereas TIG's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, FAF's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TIG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FAF is more volatile compared to TIG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAF.Check TIG's competition here