Eagle Materials Inc.
Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EXP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Construction Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXP | $187.23 | +0.41% | 6B | 14.17 | $13.22 | +0.53% |
| CRH | $103.02 | +3.21% | 69B | 18.70 | $5.51 | +1.46% |
| MLM | $585.31 | +0.27% | 35.3B | 35.80 | $16.35 | +0.56% |
| VMC | $265.95 | +0.20% | 35.1B | 32.62 | $8.15 | +0.75% |
| AMRZ | $56.35 | +1.43% | 31.2B | 26.33 | $2.14 | N/A |
| CX | $10.77 | +3.51% | 15.6B | 39.93 | $0.27 | +0.83% |
| JHX | $19.87 | +1.17% | 11.5B | 82.88 | $0.24 | N/A |
| SUM | $52.49 | +0.08% | 9.2B | 61.75 | $0.85 | N/A |
| KNF | $80.73 | +2.88% | 4.6B | 29.25 | $2.76 | N/A |
| USLM | $126.85 | +6.39% | 3.6B | 27.16 | $4.67 | +0.19% |
Stock Comparison
EXP vs CRH Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, CRH has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while CRH trades at $103.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas CRH's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CRH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to CRH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CRH's competition here
EXP vs MLM Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, MLM has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while MLM trades at $585.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas MLM's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MLM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to MLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check MLM's competition here
EXP vs VMC Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, VMC has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while VMC trades at $265.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas VMC's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VMC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to VMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check VMC's competition here
EXP vs AMRZ Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, AMRZ has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while AMRZ trades at $56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas AMRZ's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMRZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to AMRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check AMRZ's competition here
EXP vs CX Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, CX has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while CX trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas CX's P/E ratio is 39.93. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to CX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CX's competition here
EXP vs JHX Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, JHX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while JHX trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas JHX's P/E ratio is 82.88. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JHX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to JHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check JHX's competition here
EXP vs SUM Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, SUM has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while SUM trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas SUM's P/E ratio is 61.75. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SUM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to SUM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check SUM's competition here
EXP vs KNF Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, KNF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while KNF trades at $80.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas KNF's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to KNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check KNF's competition here
EXP vs USLM Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, USLM has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while USLM trades at $126.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas USLM's P/E ratio is 27.16. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USLM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to USLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check USLM's competition here
EXP vs TTAM Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, TTAM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while TTAM trades at $15.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas TTAM's P/E ratio is 16.16. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TTAM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to TTAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check TTAM's competition here
EXP vs BCC Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, BCC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while BCC trades at $71.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas BCC's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BCC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to BCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check BCC's competition here
EXP vs TGLS Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, TGLS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while TGLS trades at $43.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas TGLS's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGLS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to TGLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check TGLS's competition here
EXP vs LOMA Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, LOMA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while LOMA trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas LOMA's P/E ratio is 166.42. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LOMA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to LOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check LOMA's competition here
EXP vs CPAC Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, CPAC has a market cap of 879.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while CPAC trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas CPAC's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CPAC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to CPAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CPAC's competition here
EXP vs SMID Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, SMID has a market cap of 174.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while SMID trades at $32.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas SMID's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SMID's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to SMID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check SMID's competition here
EXP vs FEAM Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while FEAM trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check FEAM's competition here
EXP vs CAPS Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, CAPS has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while CAPS trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas CAPS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CAPS's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to CAPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check CAPS's competition here
EXP vs RETO Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, RETO has a market cap of 324.1K. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while RETO trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas RETO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RETO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is less volatile compared to RETO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check RETO's competition here
EXP vs USCR Comparison March 2026
EXP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EXP stands at 6B. In comparison, USCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EXP is priced at $187.23, while USCR trades at $73.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EXP currently has a P/E ratio of 14.17, whereas USCR's P/E ratio is -393.56. In terms of profitability, EXP's ROE is +0.29%, compared to USCR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EXP is more volatile compared to USCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EXP.Check USCR's competition here