Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 229.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ABT trades at $131.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ABT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BSX-PA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BSX trades at $105.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 62.58. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BSX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SYK trades at $390.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 51.63. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SYK's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while MDT trades at $92.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 25.42. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MDT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while DXCM trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check DXCM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while PHG trades at $27.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 145.21. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PHG's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while STE trades at $248.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check STE's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while PODD trades at $329.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 100.61. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PODD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ZBH trades at $107.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ZBH's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ABMD trades at $381.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ABMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SNN trades at $37.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SNN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SWAV trades at $334.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SWAV's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ALGN trades at $144.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 24.49. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ALGN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while PEN trades at $264.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 69.75. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PEN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while GMED trades at $61.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check GMED's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BIO trades at $297.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 26.81. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BIO's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BIO-B trades at $247.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BIO-B's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while IRTC trades at $165.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -56.55. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check IRTC's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while GKOS trades at $91.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -56.87. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check GKOS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BRKR trades at $34.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is 66.56. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BRKR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BRKR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while NARI trades at $79.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NARI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while TMDX trades at $114.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 57.77. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TMDX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ITGR trades at $108.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 46.51. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW and ITGR have similar daily volatility (1.69).Check ITGR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while AXNX trades at $70.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AXNX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while LIVN trades at $56.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is -14.52. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LIVN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LIVN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while INSP trades at $92.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 53.41. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check INSP's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ATEC trades at $15.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ATEC's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while PRCT trades at $39.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -25.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PRCT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while NUVA trades at $39.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NUVA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while AORT trades at $43.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is -101.23. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AORT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AORT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while UFPT trades at $220.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check UFPT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CNMD trades at $54.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 15.34. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CNMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SSII trades at $6.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -116.33. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SSII's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while HSKA trades at $119.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check HSKA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while AHCO trades at $9.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AHCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AHCO's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ESTA trades at $40.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ESTA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SILK trades at $27.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SILK's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while IART trades at $14.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -2.18. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check IART's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while FNA trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check FNA's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while INMD trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check INMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 909.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while IRMD trades at $71.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 44.41. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check IRMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CSII trades at $20.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CSII's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 818.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while TNDM trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TNDM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CRY trades at $17.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CRY's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 692.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SIBN trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -28.16. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SIBN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 680.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while AXGN trades at $14.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -147.90. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AXGN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while APEN trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check APEN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 572.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while OFIX trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -4.57. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check OFIX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 537.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while AVNS trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AVNS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 534.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ZIMV trades at $18.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.48. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ZIMV's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 522.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CTKB trades at $4.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -82.20. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CTKB's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 508.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while KIDS trades at $20.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check KIDS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 504.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SRDX trades at $35.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -28.48. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SRDX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 497.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BVS trades at $7.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 248.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BVS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BVS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 473.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while VREX trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -3.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check VREX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 471.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while TMCI trades at $7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TMCI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 444.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SMLR trades at $30.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SMLR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BFLY-WT has a market cap of 426.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BFLY-WT trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BFLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BFLY-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BFLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BFLY-WT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 419.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CBLL trades at $11.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CBLL's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 396.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while PACB trades at $1.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PACB's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PACB's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 390.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BFLY trades at $1.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BFLY's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 366.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SENS trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SENS's ROE of -12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SENS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 365.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SNWV trades at $42.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SNWV's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SNWV's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 352.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while RXST trades at $8.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -10.76. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RXST's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 298.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CLPT trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -13.12. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CLPT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BWAY trades at $15.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 54.86. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BWAY's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 289.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while TCMD trades at $13.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TCMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 286.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while NPCE trades at $8.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -10.55. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NPCE's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 275M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while VMD trades at $7.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check VMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 256.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CATX trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CATX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while NNOX trades at $3.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NNOX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 245.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CERS trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -12.80. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CERS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, OM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while OM trades at $13.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas OM's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OM's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to OM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check OM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 226.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while MASS trades at $6.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -2.66. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MASS's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while NVRO trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NVRO's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 220.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while SGHT trades at $4.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check SGHT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 217M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while QTRX trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check QTRX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while EYES trades at $4.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to EYES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check EYES's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 208.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while INGN trades at $7.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check INGN's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 194.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while MGRM trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -9.98. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MGRM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while CVRX trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -3.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check CVRX's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 187.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while TLSI trades at $4.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -4.29. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check TLSI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 169.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ELMD trades at $20.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ELMD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while BSGM trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.05. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +41.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check BSGM's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, LNSR has a market cap of 151.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while LNSR trades at $12.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas LNSR's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LNSR's ROE of +51.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LNSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LNSR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, MXCT has a market cap of 148.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while MXCT trades at $1.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas MXCT's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to MXCT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to MXCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check MXCT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while PROF trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check PROF's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 133.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while AVR trades at $3.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to AVR's ROE of -2.52%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check AVR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 131.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ANIK trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -10.14. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ANIK's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while LUCD trades at $1.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to LUCD's ROE of -4.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check LUCD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, OWLT has a market cap of 125.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while OWLT trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas OWLT's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to OWLT's ROE of +2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to OWLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check OWLT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, RCEL has a market cap of 123.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while RCEL trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas RCEL's P/E ratio is -2.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RCEL's ROE of +279.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RCEL's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, RPID has a market cap of 116.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while RPID trades at $2.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas RPID's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to RPID's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RPID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check RPID's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while QIPT trades at $2.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check QIPT's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, ICAD has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while ICAD trades at $3.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas ICAD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to ICAD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ICAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check ICAD's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, NSPR has a market cap of 100.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while NSPR trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas NSPR's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to NSPR's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NSPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check NSPR's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, HJLI has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while HJLI trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas HJLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HJLI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to HJLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check HJLI's competition here

EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 47.5B. In comparison, HYPR has a market cap of 98.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $80.86, while HYPR trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EW currently has a P/E ratio of 33.85, whereas HYPR's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.41%, compared to HYPR's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to HYPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.Check HYPR's competition here