Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation EW Peers
See (EW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EW | $77.02 | +0.94% | 45.1B | 31.78 | $2.42 | N/A |
| ABT | $125.68 | -0.04% | 219B | 15.77 | $7.98 | +1.86% |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| BSX | $107.46 | +4.16% | 159.5B | 78.67 | $1.37 | N/A |
| SYK | $401.87 | +1.70% | 153.2B | 54.18 | $7.40 | +0.83% |
| MDT | $92.20 | +0.60% | 117.9B | 25.49 | $3.61 | +3.06% |
| DXCM | $87.07 | +2.29% | 33.9B | 64.98 | $1.33 | N/A |
| PHG | $25.86 | +3.34% | 23.9B | 86.18 | $0.30 | +3.45% |
| STE | $228.07 | +1.96% | 22.2B | 36.69 | $6.15 | +1.01% |
| PODD | $286.05 | +0.17% | 20.2B | 51.75 | $5.54 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
EW vs ABT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 219B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ABT trades at $125.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 15.77. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BSX-PA Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BSX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 159.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BSX trades at $107.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 78.67. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SYK Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 153.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SYK trades at $401.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 54.18. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs MDT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, MDT has a market cap of 117.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while MDT trades at $92.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas MDT's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MDT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to MDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs DXCM Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while DXCM trades at $87.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 64.98. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PHG Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PHG trades at $25.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 86.18. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs STE Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while STE trades at $228.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PODD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PODD trades at $286.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ZBH Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ZBH trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ABMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ALGN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ALGN trades at $203.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 37.11. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SNN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SNN trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 33.87. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SWAV Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SWAV trades at $334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PEN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PEN trades at $232.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 214.28. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs GMED Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while GMED trades at $54.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 40.34. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BIO Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BIO trades at $260.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BIO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BIO-B Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BIO-B trades at $247.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BRKR Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BRKR trades at $41.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is 76.75. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BRKR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs GKOS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while GKOS trades at $95.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -42.29. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs NARI Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs IRTC Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while IRTC trades at $133.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -43.01. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ITGR Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ITGR trades at $107.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 53.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs INSP Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while INSP trades at $129.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 60.21. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs TMDX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while TMDX trades at $109.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 77.44. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs AXNX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PRCT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PRCT trades at $59.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -35.54. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs LIVN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while LIVN trades at $43.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is -10.84. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LIVN's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs NUVA Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs UFPT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while UFPT trades at $240.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 29.82. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ATEC Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ATEC trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CNMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CNMD trades at $49.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs AORT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while AORT trades at $31.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is -61.26. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AORT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SSII Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SSII trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -85.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SSII's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs HSKA Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs AHCO Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while AHCO trades at $9.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AHCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ESTA Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ESTA trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -13.84. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SILK Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs FNA Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs TNDM Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while TNDM trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs INMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while INMD trades at $14.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 6.70. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs IART Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 994.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while IART trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -33.68. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CSII Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SIBN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 756.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SIBN trades at $17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -28.19. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CRY Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CRY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CRY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs IRMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 724.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while IRMD trades at $56.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 36.77. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SMLR Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 717.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SMLR trades at $38.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is -16.45. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SMLR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs AXGN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while AXGN trades at $13.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -84.12. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BFLY-WT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BFLY-WT has a market cap of 589.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BFLY-WT trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BFLY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BFLY-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BFLY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs KIDS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 586.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while KIDS trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -13.45. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs APEN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CBLL Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 569.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CBLL trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs AVNS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 560.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while AVNS trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -1.47. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BFLY Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 536M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BFLY trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ZIMV Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 524.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ZIMV trades at $18.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -20.87. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PACB Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 507.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PACB trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PACB's ROE of -1.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SRDX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SRDX trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -23.17. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs OFIX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 450.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while OFIX trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SENS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 444.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SENS trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -5.36. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SENS's ROE of -7.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BVS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 429.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BVS trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is -13.48. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BVS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CTKB Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 426.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CTKB trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -37.44. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs TMCI Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 382.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while TMCI trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -7.15. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs NNOX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 347.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while NNOX trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs OM Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, OM has a market cap of 344.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while OM trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas OM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to OM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to OM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PTHL Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PTHL has a market cap of 335.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PTHL trades at $24.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PTHL's P/E ratio is -471.40. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PTHL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PTHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CLPT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 327.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CLPT trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -15.24. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CATX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 321.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CATX trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -3.44. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs RXST Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while RXST trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -11.97. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs VREX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while VREX trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SNWV Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 315.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SNWV trades at $36.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SNWV's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs NPCE Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while NPCE trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -11.59. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CERS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 277.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CERS trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs QTRX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 265.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while QTRX trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs MASS Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 262.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while MASS trades at $7.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs VMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 255.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while VMD trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs MXCT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, MXCT has a market cap of 247.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while MXCT trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas MXCT's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MXCT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to MXCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs TCMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 243.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while TCMD trades at $10.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BWAY Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 224.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BWAY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 54.05. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs CVRX Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 224.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while CVRX trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -3.87. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs NVRO Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs EYES Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while EYES trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to EYES's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs MGRM Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while MGRM trades at $5.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs SGHT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 195.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while SGHT trades at $3.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs INGN Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while INGN trades at $6.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -5.85. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs TLSI Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, TLSI has a market cap of 178.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while TLSI trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas TLSI's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to TLSI's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to TLSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs RPID Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, RPID has a market cap of 176.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while RPID trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas RPID's P/E ratio is -3.91. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RPID's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RPID. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs PROF Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 175.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while PROF trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs BSGM Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while BSGM trades at $5.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to BSGM's ROE of -35.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs RCEL Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, RCEL has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while RCEL trades at $6.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas RCEL's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to RCEL's ROE of -3.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to RCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ANIK Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ANIK trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ELMD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ELMD trades at $19.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs LNSR Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, LNSR has a market cap of 156.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while LNSR trades at $13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas LNSR's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LNSR's ROE of -5.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LNSR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs LUNG Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, LUNG has a market cap of 152.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while LUNG trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas LUNG's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LUNG's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LUNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs OWLT Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, OWLT has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while OWLT trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas OWLT's P/E ratio is -5.29. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to OWLT's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to OWLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs AVR Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 123.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while AVR trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to AVR's ROE of -2.92%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs LUCD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, LUCD has a market cap of 121.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while LUCD trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas LUCD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to LUCD's ROE of +26.96%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to LUCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs ICAD Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, ICAD has a market cap of 106.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while ICAD trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas ICAD's P/E ratio is -20.37. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to ICAD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is more volatile compared to ICAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs FONR Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, FONR has a market cap of 100.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while FONR trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas FONR's P/E ratio is 12.98. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to FONR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to FONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.
EW vs HJLI Comparison
EW plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EW stands at 45.1B. In comparison, HJLI has a market cap of 98.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EW is priced at $77.02, while HJLI trades at $10.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.78, whereas HJLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EW's ROE is +0.49%, compared to HJLI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EW is less volatile compared to HJLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EW.