Elite Express Holding Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for ETS
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for ETS
Elite Express Holding Inc. (ETS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ETS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Trucking Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETS | $0.66 | -4.58% | 11M | -4.11 | -$0.16 | N/A |
| ODFL | $198.00 | -0.82% | 41.4B | 40.99 | $4.83 | +0.57% |
| KNX | $58.60 | +1.77% | 9.5B | 142.93 | $0.41 | +1.26% |
| SAIA | $354.28 | -0.17% | 9.4B | 37.25 | $9.51 | N/A |
| TFII | $111.35 | +0.52% | 9.2B | 29.93 | $3.72 | +1.65% |
| SNDR | $27.03 | +2.00% | 4.7B | 45.81 | $0.59 | +1.42% |
| RXO | $14.94 | -0.93% | 2.5B | -25.32 | -$0.59 | N/A |
| ARCB | $100.51 | +0.85% | 2.3B | 38.36 | $2.62 | +0.48% |
| WERN | $30.46 | +2.59% | 1.8B | -126.92 | -$0.24 | +1.84% |
| MRTN | $13.77 | +2.99% | 1.1B | 65.57 | $0.21 | +1.74% |
Stock Comparison
ETS vs ODFL Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, ODFL has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while ODFL trades at $198.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas ODFL's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ODFL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ODFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ODFL's competition here
ETS vs KNX Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, KNX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while KNX trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas KNX's P/E ratio is 142.93. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to KNX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to KNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check KNX's competition here
ETS vs SAIA Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, SAIA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while SAIA trades at $354.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas SAIA's P/E ratio is 37.25. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SAIA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SAIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SAIA's competition here
ETS vs TFII Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, TFII has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while TFII trades at $111.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas TFII's P/E ratio is 29.93. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TFII's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TFII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TFII's competition here
ETS vs SNDR Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, SNDR has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while SNDR trades at $27.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas SNDR's P/E ratio is 45.81. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SNDR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SNDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SNDR's competition here
ETS vs RXO Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, RXO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while RXO trades at $14.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas RXO's P/E ratio is -25.32. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to RXO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to RXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check RXO's competition here
ETS vs ARCB Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, ARCB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while ARCB trades at $100.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas ARCB's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ARCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ARCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ARCB's competition here
ETS vs WERN Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, WERN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while WERN trades at $30.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas WERN's P/E ratio is -126.92. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to WERN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to WERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check WERN's competition here
ETS vs MRTN Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, MRTN has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while MRTN trades at $13.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas MRTN's P/E ratio is 65.57. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to MRTN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to MRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check MRTN's competition here
ETS vs HTLD Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, HTLD has a market cap of 824.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while HTLD trades at $10.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas HTLD's P/E ratio is -15.88. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HTLD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to HTLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HTLD's competition here
ETS vs CVLG Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, CVLG has a market cap of 706.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while CVLG trades at $28.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas CVLG's P/E ratio is 175.94. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to CVLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to CVLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check CVLG's competition here
ETS vs ULH Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, ULH has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while ULH trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas ULH's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to ULH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to ULH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check ULH's competition here
ETS vs PTSI Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, PTSI has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while PTSI trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas PTSI's P/E ratio is -164.33. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PTSI's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PTSI's competition here
ETS vs DSKE Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, DSKE has a market cap of 391.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while DSKE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas DSKE's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DSKE's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to DSKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKE's competition here
ETS vs USX Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, USX has a market cap of 332.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while USX trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas USX's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to USX's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USX's competition here
ETS vs PAMT Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, PAMT has a market cap of 185M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while PAMT trades at $8.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas PAMT's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PAMT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PAMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PAMT's competition here
ETS vs PATI Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, PATI has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while PATI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas PATI's P/E ratio is 21.97. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to PATI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to PATI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check PATI's competition here
ETS vs TSP Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, TSP has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while TSP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas TSP's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TSP's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to TSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TSP's competition here
ETS vs YELL Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, YELL has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while YELL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas YELL's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YELL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to YELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YELL's competition here
ETS vs BEST Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, BEST has a market cap of 55.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while BEST trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas BEST's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to BEST's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to BEST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check BEST's competition here
ETS vs SLGB Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, SLGB has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while SLGB trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas SLGB's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to SLGB's ROE of -7672.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to SLGB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check SLGB's competition here
ETS vs TOPP Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, TOPP has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while TOPP trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas TOPP's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to TOPP's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to TOPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check TOPP's competition here
ETS vs HXHX Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, HXHX has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while HXHX trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas HXHX's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to HXHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to HXHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check HXHX's competition here
ETS vs YGMZ Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, YGMZ has a market cap of 17K. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while YGMZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas YGMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to YGMZ's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to YGMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check YGMZ's competition here
ETS vs USAK Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, USAK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while USAK trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas USAK's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to USAK's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to USAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check USAK's competition here
ETS vs AXPW Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, AXPW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while AXPW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas AXPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to AXPW's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is more volatile compared to AXPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check AXPW's competition here
ETS vs DSKEW Comparison April 2026
ETS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ETS stands at 11M. In comparison, DSKEW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ETS is priced at $0.66, while DSKEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ETS currently has a P/E ratio of -4.11, whereas DSKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ETS's ROE is -0.28%, compared to DSKEW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ETS is less volatile compared to DSKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ETS.Check DSKEW's competition here