Integra Essentia Limited
Integra Essentia Limited (ESSENTIA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ESSENTIA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ESSENTIA.NS | ₹1.67 | +28.46% | 1.5B | 48.33 | ₹0.03 | N/A |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹37,304.15 | -0.20% | 418.9B | 55.85 | ₹672.38 | +1.60% |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹37,345.00 | -0.15% | 418.7B | 55.77 | ₹673.17 | +1.60% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹976.85 | +2.27% | 326.6B | 38.77 | ₹24.64 | +0.52% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹978.00 | +2.34% | 326.5B | 38.74 | ₹24.66 | +0.52% |
| VTL.NS | ₹596.45 | -6.23% | 176.4B | 21.74 | ₹28.05 | +0.82% |
| VTL.BO | ₹596.70 | -6.22% | 176.3B | 21.72 | ₹28.06 | +0.82% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| TRIDENT.BO | ₹26.81 | +3.04% | 134.9B | 33.10 | ₹0.80 | +1.89% |
Stock Comparison
ESSENTIA.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 418.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹37,304.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 55.85. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 418.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹37,345.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 55.77. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 326.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹976.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.77. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 326.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹978.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.74. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 176.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while VTL.NS trades at ₹596.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 176.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while VTL.BO trades at ₹596.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.72. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹26.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.10. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 134.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹26.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.09. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹132.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 54.25. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹132.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 54.20. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 108.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹355.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 107.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹446.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹331.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹447.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 25.22. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 102.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹447.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 80.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹67.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.49. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹67.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,583.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,584.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 71.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -9.54. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 66.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹672.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹672.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹457.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is -377.95. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹457.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is -377.48. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹291.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.23. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹291.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.64. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹812.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 95.22. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹812.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 94.77. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹727.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹729.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 43.76. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,509.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 40.05. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,508.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.36. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹513.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 102.70. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹514.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.88. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹171.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -19.79. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹171.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹496.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹497.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.09. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹493.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹493.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹1,034.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 69.44. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹1,034.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 69.39. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹26.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹26.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 40.15. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹528.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.17. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹135.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 27.23. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹135.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 154.46. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹527.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.21. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹601.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.63. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹601.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹605.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹605.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹822.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹820.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹238.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.78. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹239.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹45.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹45.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹155.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹155.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹300.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹300.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.43. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹30.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹285.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹231.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -871.89. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹229.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -867.59. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹588.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹589.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹154.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.91. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RUPA.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹153.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.93. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RUPA.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹21.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 50.43. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs FAZE3Q.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹457.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 35.22. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹455.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 34.98. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹86.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹39.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.43. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹279.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹281.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 49.07. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹449.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹449.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,648.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 15.07. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,655.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹93.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹93.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹168.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹168.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 103.06. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹244.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹245.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹94.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹94.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -59.76. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs UNITEDPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹33.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -6.88. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,358.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
ESSENTIA.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison May 2026
ESSENTIA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ESSENTIA.NS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ESSENTIA.NS is priced at ₹1.67, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,360.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ESSENTIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 48.33, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, ESSENTIA.NS's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ESSENTIA.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ESSENTIA.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here