Himatsingka Seide Limited (HIMATSEIDE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HIMATSEIDE.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIMATSEIDE.NS | ₹83.94 | +0.27% | 10.6B | 17.03 | ₹4.93 | +0.30% |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹39,976.55 | -0.57% | 446.2B | 58.46 | ₹683.77 | +1.38% |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹39,975.00 | -0.51% | 445.9B | 58.28 | ₹685.91 | +1.38% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹1,161.50 | -2.22% | 396.5B | 45.89 | ₹25.31 | +0.43% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹1,159.75 | -2.25% | 396.4B | 45.82 | ₹25.31 | +0.43% |
| VTL.BO | ₹657.25 | -0.42% | 190.2B | 25.11 | ₹26.17 | +0.76% |
| VTL.NS | ₹657.45 | -0.60% | 190.2B | 25.13 | ₹26.16 | +0.76% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| WELSPUNLIV.NS | ₹162.23 | -0.47% | 155.6B | 75.81 | ₹2.14 | +1.05% |
| WELSPUNLIV.BO | ₹162.10 | -0.55% | 154.7B | 75.75 | ₹2.14 | +1.05% |
Stock Comparison
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 446.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹39,976.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 58.46. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 445.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹39,975.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 58.28. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 396.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹1,161.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.89. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 396.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹1,159.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.82. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while VTL.BO trades at ₹657.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while VTL.NS trades at ₹657.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.13. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 155.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹162.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 75.81. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹162.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 75.75. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 135.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹516.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 135.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹516.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 132.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹331.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹318.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 83B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.88. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,793.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹795.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 79.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹796.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹394.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹394.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.11. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 74.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹60.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹60.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹13.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹484.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is 52.33. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹486.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is 52.48. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹818.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹816.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 52.30. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 49.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹810.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 106.66. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹808.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 106.68. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹585.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 74.52. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 39B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹586.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 115.67. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,246.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,246.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹827.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹826.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹163.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is 563.48. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹163.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 563.10. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹32.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 46.34. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹568.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹568.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹492.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.41. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹493.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.44. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹631.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹631.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹134.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 28.64. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 103.85. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹540.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.87. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹541.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.95. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹1,027.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.60. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹1,028.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.63. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹927.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 64.19. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹927.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 64.15. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹54.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹54.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹183.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 19.50. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹183.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹227.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.88. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹227.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹258.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹258.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.63. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹598.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs FAZE3Q.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹597.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 56.17. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RUPA.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹160.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RUPA.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹161.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹215.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 191.08. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 190.27. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹46.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹46.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹21.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 51.36. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹560.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹561.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹527.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 19.71. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹524.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹339.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹340.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,679.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,679.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹255.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 36.92. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹256.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 27.79. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹95.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹95.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹192.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 113.35. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs PRECOT.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹753.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹191.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹96.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹96.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -61.46. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs UNITEDPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is less volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs IRISDOREME.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, IRISDOREME.NS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while IRISDOREME.NS trades at ₹39.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas IRISDOREME.NS's P/E ratio is 46.95. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IRISDOREME.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to IRISDOREME.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check IRISDOREME.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,112.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here
HIMATSEIDE.NS vs SUTLEJTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
HIMATSEIDE.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HIMATSEIDE.NS stands at 10.6B. In comparison, SUTLEJTEX.NS has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HIMATSEIDE.NS is priced at ₹83.94, while SUTLEJTEX.NS trades at ₹38.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HIMATSEIDE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.03, whereas SUTLEJTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -7.24. In terms of profitability, HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SUTLEJTEX.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HIMATSEIDE.NS is more volatile compared to SUTLEJTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HIMATSEIDE.NS.Check SUTLEJTEX.NS's competition here