Faze Three Limited
Faze Three Limited (FAZE3Q.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FAZE3Q.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAZE3Q.NS | ₹506.65 | +4.99% | 12.3B | 39.18 | ₹12.93 | N/A |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹38,547.10 | -2.37% | 429.9B | 56.37 | ₹683.82 | +1.56% |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹38,545.00 | -2.31% | 429.9B | 56.15 | ₹686.52 | +1.56% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹950.45 | +0.93% | 324.9B | 37.52 | ₹25.33 | +0.53% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹949.80 | +1.07% | 324.7B | 37.50 | ₹25.33 | +0.53% |
| VTL.BO | ₹601.60 | -1.38% | 174B | 23.00 | ₹26.16 | +0.83% |
| VTL.NS | ₹601.40 | -1.51% | 174B | 22.95 | ₹26.20 | +0.83% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| WELSPUNLIV.NS | ₹138.62 | -0.42% | 132.5B | 64.78 | ₹2.14 | +1.23% |
Stock Comparison
FAZE3Q.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 429.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹38,547.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 56.37. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 429.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹38,545.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 56.15. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹950.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.52. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 324.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹949.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.50. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while VTL.BO trades at ₹601.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.00. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 174B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while VTL.NS trades at ₹601.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹138.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 64.78. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹138.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 64.63. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 126.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹482.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 30.52. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹482.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 125.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹331.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹322.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 82.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹67.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.66. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹67.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 75.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,628.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,627.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹639.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 31.96. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 63.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹638.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -8.41. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹465.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is 50.34. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 62.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹465.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is 50.30. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹311.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.19. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 61.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹310.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 51.44. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹714.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 54.52. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹714.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 45.75. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹729.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 95.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹728.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 95.78. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,364.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,362.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.98. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹559.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 71.14. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹558.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 109.80. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹163.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -19.30. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹748.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹747.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.71. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹162.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -19.25. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹501.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹501.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹445.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.34. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹445.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.35. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹601.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹600.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹26.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹126.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹126.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 97.08. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹512.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.12. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹513.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹944.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 63.39. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹942.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 63.21. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹166.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹165.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹769.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹768.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹218.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.51. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹217.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹272.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹272.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹215.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -796.30. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹214.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -826.46. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹502.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 38.92. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS and FAZE3Q.BO have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUPA.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹148.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUPA.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹148.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹548.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹546.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 48.10. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹507.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹506.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹79.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹79.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹37.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹37.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹265.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹263.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 48.52. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,605.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,604.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs PRECOT.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹762.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 22.67. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹273.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹271.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹93.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹93.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹173.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹97.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -62.31. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹97.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹173.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 101.76. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs UNITEDPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -7.63. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,138.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,133.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs IRISDOREME.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, IRISDOREME.NS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while IRISDOREME.NS trades at ₹35.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas IRISDOREME.NS's P/E ratio is 46.84. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRISDOREME.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to IRISDOREME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check IRISDOREME.NS's competition here
FAZE3Q.NS vs SUTLEJTEX.NS Comparison May 2026
FAZE3Q.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FAZE3Q.NS stands at 12.3B. In comparison, SUTLEJTEX.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FAZE3Q.NS is priced at ₹506.65, while SUTLEJTEX.NS trades at ₹36.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FAZE3Q.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 39.18, whereas SUTLEJTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -6.84. In terms of profitability, FAZE3Q.NS's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUTLEJTEX.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FAZE3Q.NS is less volatile compared to SUTLEJTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FAZE3Q.NS.Check SUTLEJTEX.NS's competition here