Sportking India Limited (SPORTKING.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SPORTKING.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPORTKING.NS | ₹183.49 | +0.48% | 23.3B | 19.54 | ₹9.39 | +0.54% |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹39,195.00 | +1.48% | 437.2B | 57.33 | ₹683.66 | +1.40% |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹39,156.85 | +1.30% | 436.4B | 57.23 | ₹684.21 | +1.40% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹1,055.45 | -0.97% | 360.8B | 41.60 | ₹25.37 | +0.47% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹1,052.40 | -1.51% | 358.8B | 41.56 | ₹25.32 | +0.47% |
| VTL.BO | ₹637.65 | +1.60% | 184.5B | 24.37 | ₹26.17 | +0.78% |
| VTL.NS | ₹637.80 | +1.58% | 184.5B | 24.36 | ₹26.18 | +0.78% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| WELSPUNLIV.NS | ₹144.93 | +4.61% | 138.5B | 68.04 | ₹2.13 | +1.17% |
Stock Comparison
SPORTKING.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 437.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹39,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 57.33. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 436.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹39,156.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 57.23. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 360.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹1,055.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.60. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 358.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹1,052.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 184.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while VTL.BO trades at ₹637.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.37. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 184.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while VTL.NS trades at ₹637.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹144.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 68.04. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 138.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹144.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 68.03. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 130.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹499.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.33. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 130.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹498.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 125.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹24.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.27. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 125.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹24.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹331.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 99.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹316.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 78.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,694.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 78B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,694.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 74.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹61.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.57. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹61.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.56. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹349.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 54.54. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹348.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.62. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹679.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 33.96. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹679.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 33.97. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹462.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is 50.05. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹461.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is 50.02. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹721.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹721.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 55.14. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹807.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 106.12. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹807.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 105.78. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹591.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 117.21. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹591.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 75.25. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,294.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.43. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹797.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹797.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹547.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹547.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.49. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹153.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 513.00. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹153.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is 512.43. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 43.06. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹632.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹631.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹461.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹461.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.04. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹131.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 27.91. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹131.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 101.10. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹531.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹530.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.23. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹931.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 64.03. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹929.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 63.99. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹53.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹53.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹183.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 19.53. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹867.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹867.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.63. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹218.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹219.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.14. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹252.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹253.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.35. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹548.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs FAZE3Q.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹549.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹219.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 194.60. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 55.37. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹220.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 196.99. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹153.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RUPA.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RUPA.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RUPA.NS trades at ₹153.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RUPA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.82. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUPA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RUPA.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹45.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹45.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹551.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹552.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.22. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 48.36. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹333.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 25.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹334.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹499.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹498.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹77.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.76. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹77.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹206.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 18.73. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹206.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 121.29. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,640.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,636.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 13.08. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹254.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹252.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 36.52. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs PRECOT.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹730.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 24.48. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹90.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹90.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹97.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -62.39. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹97.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs UNITEDPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹33.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs IRISDOREME.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, IRISDOREME.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while IRISDOREME.NS trades at ₹38.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas IRISDOREME.NS's P/E ratio is 44.73. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRISDOREME.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to IRISDOREME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check IRISDOREME.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,098.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,097.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.41. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
SPORTKING.NS vs SUTLEJTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
SPORTKING.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SPORTKING.NS stands at 23.3B. In comparison, SUTLEJTEX.NS has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SPORTKING.NS is priced at ₹183.49, while SUTLEJTEX.NS trades at ₹37.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SPORTKING.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 19.54, whereas SUTLEJTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, SPORTKING.NS's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUTLEJTEX.NS's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SPORTKING.NS is less volatile compared to SUTLEJTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SPORTKING.NS.Check SUTLEJTEX.NS's competition here