Rupa & Company Limited
Rupa & Company Limited (RUPA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUPA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUPA.NS | ₹149.37 | -2.12% | 11.9B | 17.78 | ₹8.40 | +1.97% |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹37,400.00 | +1.20% | 417.2B | 55.56 | ₹673.17 | +1.62% |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹37,380.40 | +1.28% | 416.9B | 55.59 | ₹672.38 | +1.62% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹955.65 | -0.01% | 326.7B | 38.75 | ₹24.66 | +0.52% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹955.15 | -0.03% | 326.5B | 38.75 | ₹24.65 | +0.52% |
| VTL.BO | ₹636.30 | +1.27% | 184.1B | 22.06 | ₹28.84 | +0.80% |
| VTL.NS | ₹636.05 | +1.59% | 184B | 22.18 | ₹28.68 | +0.80% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| TRIDENT.NS | ₹26.04 | -0.88% | 132.7B | 32.55 | ₹0.80 | +1.90% |
Stock Comparison
RUPA.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 417.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹37,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 55.56. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 416.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹37,380.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 55.59. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 326.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹955.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 326.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹955.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.75. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 184.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while VTL.BO trades at ₹636.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.06. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 184B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while VTL.NS trades at ₹636.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.18. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹26.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.55. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 132.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 32.53. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹130.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 53.14. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹130.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹343.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MANYAVAR.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MANYAVAR.BO has a market cap of 104.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while MANYAVAR.BO trades at ₹430.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MANYAVAR.BO's P/E ratio is 28.67. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MANYAVAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to MANYAVAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MANYAVAR.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹331.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹394.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 103.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹393.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹63.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.17. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹63.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,535.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,534.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.94. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹13.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹624.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹624.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹436.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is -343.62. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹436.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is -343.54. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 57.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹291.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.79. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹290.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 48.30. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 49.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹680.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 43.77. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹680.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 48.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹792.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 90.78. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹791.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 90.62. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,416.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 37.82. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,416.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹170.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹170.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹442.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 56.35. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹442.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 56.35. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹467.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.64. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹465.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.61. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹503.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹1,057.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 71.00. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹1,057.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 70.76. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹503.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 16.98. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹526.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.98. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹575.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.73. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹575.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹25.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹25.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.64. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹526.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 32.06. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹124.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 148.29. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹124.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹561.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹560.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹45.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹45.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹240.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹798.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.82. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹239.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹798.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.83. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹148.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹148.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹306.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹306.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹30.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.64. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GOCOLORS.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GOCOLORS.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GOCOLORS.NS trades at ₹268.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GOCOLORS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.42. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOCOLORS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GOCOLORS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GOCOLORS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹231.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -891.92. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹230.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is -821.79. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹149.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to RUPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RUPA.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹21.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 50.60. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹565.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹564.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹87.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹87.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FAZE3Q.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹449.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 34.80. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹448.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 34.63. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹38.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹37.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹270.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 29.30. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹267.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 47.11. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹434.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹433.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 13.91. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,579.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,575.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹90.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹90.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 15.25. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹240.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 16.58. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹239.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹169.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 40.78. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹169.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 99.41. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹94.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹93.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -59.76. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs UNITEDPOLY.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹32.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs DIGJAMLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DIGJAMLTD.NS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while DIGJAMLTD.NS trades at ₹82.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas DIGJAMLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to DIGJAMLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check DIGJAMLTD.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,209.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison May 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹149.37, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,205.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.78, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here