Rupa & Company Limited (RUPA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RUPA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Apparel - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUPA.NS | ₹158.87 | +4.06% | 12.5B | 17.20 | ₹9.11 | +1.91% |
| PAGEIND.BO | ₹40,060.00 | +2.53% | 438.5B | 57.40 | ₹684.21 | +1.40% |
| PAGEIND.NS | ₹39,985.00 | +2.36% | 438.3B | 57.48 | ₹683.66 | +1.40% |
| KPRMILL.NS | ₹1,093.05 | +3.65% | 356.6B | 41.19 | ₹25.33 | +0.48% |
| KPRMILL.BO | ₹1,093.60 | +3.71% | 355.9B | 41.05 | ₹25.36 | +0.48% |
| VTL.NS | ₹643.00 | +1.76% | 181.1B | 23.94 | ₹26.15 | +0.80% |
| VTL.BO | ₹634.10 | +0.57% | 181B | 23.86 | ₹26.21 | +0.80% |
| ALOKTEXT.BO | ₹37.04 | +3.81% | 161.2B | -0.72 | -₹51.22 | N/A |
| WELSPUNIND.NS | ₹159.00 | +0.03% | 153B | 29.39 | ₹5.41 | N/A |
| WELSPUNLIV.BO | ₹155.10 | +6.42% | 140.4B | 68.97 | ₹2.13 | +1.16% |
Stock Comparison
RUPA.NS vs PAGEIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PAGEIND.BO has a market cap of 438.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while PAGEIND.BO trades at ₹40,060.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas PAGEIND.BO's P/E ratio is 57.40. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAGEIND.BO's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to PAGEIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PAGEIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PAGEIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PAGEIND.NS has a market cap of 438.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while PAGEIND.NS trades at ₹39,985.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas PAGEIND.NS's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAGEIND.NS's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to PAGEIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PAGEIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KPRMILL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KPRMILL.NS has a market cap of 356.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while KPRMILL.NS trades at ₹1,093.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas KPRMILL.NS's P/E ratio is 41.19. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPRMILL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KPRMILL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KPRMILL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KPRMILL.BO has a market cap of 355.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while KPRMILL.BO trades at ₹1,093.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas KPRMILL.BO's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KPRMILL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KPRMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KPRMILL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs VTL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, VTL.NS has a market cap of 181.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while VTL.NS trades at ₹643.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas VTL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check VTL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs VTL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, VTL.BO has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while VTL.BO trades at ₹634.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas VTL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VTL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to VTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check VTL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ALOKTEXT.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ALOKTEXT.BO has a market cap of 161.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ALOKTEXT.BO trades at ₹37.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ALOKTEXT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALOKTEXT.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ALOKTEXT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ALOKTEXT.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs WELSPUNIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, WELSPUNIND.NS has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while WELSPUNIND.NS trades at ₹159.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas WELSPUNIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.39. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELSPUNIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check WELSPUNIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.BO has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while WELSPUNLIV.BO trades at ₹155.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas WELSPUNLIV.BO's P/E ratio is 68.97. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs WELSPUNLIV.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, WELSPUNLIV.NS has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while WELSPUNLIV.NS trades at ₹155.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas WELSPUNLIV.NS's P/E ratio is 68.85. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to WELSPUNLIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check WELSPUNLIV.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ARVIND.NS has a market cap of 130.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ARVIND.NS trades at ₹500.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ARVIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVIND.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ARVIND.BO has a market cap of 130.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ARVIND.BO trades at ₹502.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ARVIND.BO's P/E ratio is 32.22. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVIND.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TRIDENT.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TRIDENT.NS has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while TRIDENT.NS trades at ₹25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas TRIDENT.NS's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIDENT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to TRIDENT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TRIDENT.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TRIDENT.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TRIDENT.BO has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while TRIDENT.BO trades at ₹25.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas TRIDENT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRIDENT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to TRIDENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TRIDENT.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SWANENERGY.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.NS has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SWANENERGY.NS trades at ₹331.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SWANENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWANENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SWANENERGY.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SWANENERGY.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SWANENERGY.BO has a market cap of 99.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SWANENERGY.BO trades at ₹321.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SWANENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SWANENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SWANENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SWANENERGY.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PGIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PGIL.BO has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while PGIL.BO trades at ₹1,717.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas PGIL.BO's P/E ratio is 27.64. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGIL.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PGIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PGIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PGIL.NS has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while PGIL.NS trades at ₹1,717.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas PGIL.NS's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PGIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to PGIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PGIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ABFRL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ABFRL.NS has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ABFRL.NS trades at ₹61.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ABFRL.NS's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABFRL.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ABFRL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ABFRL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ABFRL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ABFRL.BO has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ABFRL.BO trades at ₹61.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ABFRL.BO's P/E ratio is -9.68. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABFRL.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ABFRL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ABFRL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GARFIBRES.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.BO has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GARFIBRES.BO trades at ₹698.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GARFIBRES.BO's P/E ratio is 34.72. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GARFIBRES.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GARFIBRES.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GARFIBRES.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GARFIBRES.NS has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GARFIBRES.NS trades at ₹697.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GARFIBRES.NS's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GARFIBRES.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to GARFIBRES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GARFIBRES.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ICIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ICIL.BO has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ICIL.BO trades at ₹346.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ICIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.90. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ICIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ICIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ICIL.NS has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ICIL.NS trades at ₹348.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ICIL.NS's P/E ratio is 53.37. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ICIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ICIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVINDFASN.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.NS has a market cap of 64.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ARVINDFASN.NS trades at ₹481.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ARVINDFASN.NS's P/E ratio is 52.36. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVINDFASN.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ARVINDFASN.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ARVINDFASN.BO has a market cap of 64.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ARVINDFASN.BO trades at ₹480.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ARVINDFASN.BO's P/E ratio is 52.17. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARVINDFASN.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to ARVINDFASN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ARVINDFASN.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs ALOKINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, ALOKINDS.NS has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while ALOKINDS.NS trades at ₹13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas ALOKINDS.NS's P/E ratio is -8.60. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALOKINDS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to ALOKINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check ALOKINDS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GOKEX.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GOKEX.NS has a market cap of 53.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GOKEX.NS trades at ₹764.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GOKEX.NS's P/E ratio is 55.54. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOKEX.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GOKEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GOKEX.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GOKEX.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GOKEX.BO trades at ₹764.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GOKEX.BO's P/E ratio is 46.68. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GOKEX.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GOKEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GOKEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.NS has a market cap of 49.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RAYMONDLSL.NS trades at ₹811.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RAYMONDLSL.NS's P/E ratio is 107.55. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMONDLSL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RAYMONDLSL.BO has a market cap of 49.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RAYMONDLSL.BO trades at ₹809.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RAYMONDLSL.BO's P/E ratio is 107.75. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMONDLSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMONDLSL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GBGLOBAL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GBGLOBAL.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GBGLOBAL.NS trades at ₹930.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GBGLOBAL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBGLOBAL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GBGLOBAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GBGLOBAL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMOND.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RAYMOND.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RAYMOND.NS trades at ₹592.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RAYMOND.NS's P/E ratio is 117.20. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMOND.NS's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to RAYMOND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMOND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAYMOND.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RAYMOND.BO has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RAYMOND.BO trades at ₹593.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RAYMOND.BO's P/E ratio is 75.11. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAYMOND.BO's ROE of +1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RAYMOND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAYMOND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs LUXIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, LUXIND.NS has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while LUXIND.NS trades at ₹1,247.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas LUXIND.NS's P/E ratio is 35.92. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXIND.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check LUXIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs LUXIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, LUXIND.BO has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while LUXIND.BO trades at ₹1,249.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas LUXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 35.94. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LUXIND.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to LUXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check LUXIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while TCNSBRANDS.BO trades at ₹584.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas TCNSBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is -11.87. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs TCNSBRANDS.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, TCNSBRANDS.NS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while TCNSBRANDS.NS trades at ₹583.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas TCNSBRANDS.NS's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to TCNSBRANDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check TCNSBRANDS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while MAYURUNIQ.NS trades at ₹820.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas MAYURUNIQ.NS's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MAYURUNIQ.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MAYURUNIQ.BO has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while MAYURUNIQ.BO trades at ₹818.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas MAYURUNIQ.BO's P/E ratio is 18.70. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to MAYURUNIQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MAYURUNIQ.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KITEX.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KITEX.NS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while KITEX.NS trades at ₹160.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas KITEX.NS's P/E ratio is 535.07. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KITEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KITEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KITEX.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KITEX.BO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while KITEX.BO trades at ₹160.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas KITEX.BO's P/E ratio is 534.31. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KITEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KITEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KITEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NITINSPIN.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.NS has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while NITINSPIN.NS trades at ₹555.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas NITINSPIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NITINSPIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NITINSPIN.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NITINSPIN.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, NITINSPIN.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while NITINSPIN.BO trades at ₹553.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas NITINSPIN.BO's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NITINSPIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NITINSPIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NITINSPIN.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KKCL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KKCL.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while KKCL.NS trades at ₹488.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas KKCL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.17. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKCL.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KKCL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs KKCL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, KKCL.BO has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while KKCL.BO trades at ₹485.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas KKCL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KKCL.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to KKCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check KKCL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs JINDWORLD.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.BO has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while JINDWORLD.BO trades at ₹29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas JINDWORLD.BO's P/E ratio is 42.36. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINDWORLD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check JINDWORLD.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs JINDWORLD.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, JINDWORLD.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while JINDWORLD.NS trades at ₹29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas JINDWORLD.NS's P/E ratio is 42.41. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JINDWORLD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to JINDWORLD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check JINDWORLD.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SIYSIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SIYSIL.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SIYSIL.BO trades at ₹625.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SIYSIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIYSIL.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SIYSIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SIYSIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SIYSIL.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SIYSIL.NS trades at ₹626.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SIYSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SIYSIL.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SIYSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SIYSIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs BOMDYEING.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.BO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while BOMDYEING.BO trades at ₹134.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas BOMDYEING.BO's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMDYEING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to BOMDYEING.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check BOMDYEING.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs BOMDYEING.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, BOMDYEING.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while BOMDYEING.NS trades at ₹134.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas BOMDYEING.NS's P/E ratio is 103.01. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOMDYEING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to BOMDYEING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check BOMDYEING.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SANGAMIND.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SANGAMIND.NS trades at ₹538.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SANGAMIND.NS's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANGAMIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SANGAMIND.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SANGAMIND.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SANGAMIND.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SANGAMIND.BO trades at ₹539.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SANGAMIND.BO's P/E ratio is 31.86. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANGAMIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SANGAMIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SANGAMIND.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GANECOS.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GANECOS.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GANECOS.NS trades at ₹922.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GANECOS.NS's P/E ratio is 65.05. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANECOS.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GANECOS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GANECOS.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GANECOS.BO has a market cap of 25.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GANECOS.BO trades at ₹918.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GANECOS.BO's P/E ratio is 64.97. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANECOS.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GANECOS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GANECOS.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FILATEX.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, FILATEX.BO has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while FILATEX.BO trades at ₹54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas FILATEX.BO's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FILATEX.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FILATEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FILATEX.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, FILATEX.NS has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while FILATEX.NS trades at ₹54.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas FILATEX.NS's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FILATEX.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FILATEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FILATEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPORTKING.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SPORTKING.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SPORTKING.NS trades at ₹181.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SPORTKING.NS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPORTKING.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPORTKING.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPORTKING.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SPORTKING.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SPORTKING.BO trades at ₹182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SPORTKING.BO's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPORTKING.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPORTKING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPORTKING.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPAL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SPAL.BO has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SPAL.BO trades at ₹908.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SPAL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPAL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPAL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SPAL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SPAL.NS has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SPAL.NS trades at ₹920.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SPAL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.73. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPAL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SPAL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SPAL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CANTABIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CANTABIL.BO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while CANTABIL.BO trades at ₹223.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas CANTABIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.22. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CANTABIL.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CANTABIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CANTABIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CANTABIL.NS has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while CANTABIL.NS trades at ₹222.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas CANTABIL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.25. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CANTABIL.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CANTABIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CANTABIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs DOLLAR.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, DOLLAR.NS has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while DOLLAR.NS trades at ₹258.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas DOLLAR.NS's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLLAR.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check DOLLAR.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs DOLLAR.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, DOLLAR.BO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while DOLLAR.BO trades at ₹257.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas DOLLAR.BO's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DOLLAR.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to DOLLAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check DOLLAR.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FAZE3Q.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.BO has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while FAZE3Q.BO trades at ₹575.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas FAZE3Q.BO's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZE3Q.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FAZE3Q.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs FAZE3Q.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, FAZE3Q.NS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while FAZE3Q.NS trades at ₹574.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas FAZE3Q.NS's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FAZE3Q.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to FAZE3Q.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check FAZE3Q.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SUMEETINDS.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SUMEETINDS.NS has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SUMEETINDS.NS trades at ₹26.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SUMEETINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 56.20. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUMEETINDS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SUMEETINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SUMEETINDS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.BO has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while AYMSYNTEX.BO trades at ₹220.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas AYMSYNTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 196.43. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AYMSYNTEX.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, AYMSYNTEX.NS has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while AYMSYNTEX.NS trades at ₹218.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas AYMSYNTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 194.06. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to AYMSYNTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AYMSYNTEX.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RUPA.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RUPA.BO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RUPA.BO trades at ₹158.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RUPA.BO's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUPA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS and RUPA.BO have similar daily volatility (2.02).Check RUPA.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs INDORAMA.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, INDORAMA.NS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while INDORAMA.NS trades at ₹45.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas INDORAMA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.86. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDORAMA.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to INDORAMA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check INDORAMA.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs INDORAMA.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, INDORAMA.BO has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while INDORAMA.BO trades at ₹45.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas INDORAMA.BO's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to INDORAMA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to INDORAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check INDORAMA.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RAJRILTD.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RAJRILTD.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RAJRILTD.NS trades at ₹21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RAJRILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 49.38. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAJRILTD.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RAJRILTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RAJRILTD.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MONTECARLO.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.NS has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while MONTECARLO.NS trades at ₹549.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas MONTECARLO.NS's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MONTECARLO.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to MONTECARLO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MONTECARLO.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs MONTECARLO.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, MONTECARLO.BO has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while MONTECARLO.BO trades at ₹551.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas MONTECARLO.BO's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MONTECARLO.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to MONTECARLO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check MONTECARLO.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CENTENKA.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CENTENKA.NS has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while CENTENKA.NS trades at ₹504.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas CENTENKA.NS's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTENKA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to CENTENKA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CENTENKA.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CENTENKA.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CENTENKA.BO has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while CENTENKA.BO trades at ₹503.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas CENTENKA.BO's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTENKA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CENTENKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CENTENKA.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RUBYMILLS.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.NS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RUBYMILLS.NS trades at ₹330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RUBYMILLS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUBYMILLS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RUBYMILLS.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RUBYMILLS.BO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RUBYMILLS.BO trades at ₹330.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RUBYMILLS.BO's P/E ratio is 19.67. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUBYMILLS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RUBYMILLS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RUBYMILLS.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.BO has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while HIMATSEIDE.BO trades at ₹81.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas HIMATSEIDE.BO's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs HIMATSEIDE.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, HIMATSEIDE.NS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while HIMATSEIDE.NS trades at ₹81.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas HIMATSEIDE.NS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to HIMATSEIDE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check HIMATSEIDE.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AMBIKCO.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.NS has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while AMBIKCO.NS trades at ₹1,620.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas AMBIKCO.NS's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBIKCO.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AMBIKCO.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs AMBIKCO.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, AMBIKCO.BO has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while AMBIKCO.BO trades at ₹1,624.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas AMBIKCO.BO's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMBIKCO.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to AMBIKCO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check AMBIKCO.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RSWM.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RSWM.BO has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RSWM.BO trades at ₹197.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RSWM.BO's P/E ratio is 113.53. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSWM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RSWM.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs RSWM.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, RSWM.NS has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while RSWM.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas RSWM.NS's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RSWM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to RSWM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check RSWM.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NAHARSPING.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while NAHARSPING.NS trades at ₹255.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas NAHARSPING.NS's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAHARSPING.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NAHARSPING.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.BO has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GHCLTEXTIL.BO trades at ₹93.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs GHCLTEXTIL.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, GHCLTEXTIL.NS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while GHCLTEXTIL.NS trades at ₹93.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas GHCLTEXTIL.NS's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to GHCLTEXTIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check GHCLTEXTIL.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs NAHARSPING.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, NAHARSPING.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while NAHARSPING.BO trades at ₹256.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas NAHARSPING.BO's P/E ratio is 27.19. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NAHARSPING.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to NAHARSPING.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check NAHARSPING.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs PRECOT.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, PRECOT.NS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while PRECOT.NS trades at ₹712.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas PRECOT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRECOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to PRECOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check PRECOT.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SARLAPOLY.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.BO has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SARLAPOLY.BO trades at ₹98.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SARLAPOLY.BO's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SARLAPOLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SARLAPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SARLAPOLY.NS has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SARLAPOLY.NS trades at ₹98.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SARLAPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is -62.39. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SARLAPOLY.NS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to SARLAPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SARLAPOLY.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs UNITEDPOLY.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, UNITEDPOLY.NS has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while UNITEDPOLY.NS trades at ₹32.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas UNITEDPOLY.NS's P/E ratio is 30.68. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to UNITEDPOLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check UNITEDPOLY.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs IRISDOREME.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, IRISDOREME.NS has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while IRISDOREME.NS trades at ₹40.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas IRISDOREME.NS's P/E ratio is 45.52. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRISDOREME.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is less volatile compared to IRISDOREME.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check IRISDOREME.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CHEVIOT.NS Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.NS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while CHEVIOT.NS trades at ₹1,117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas CHEVIOT.NS's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEVIOT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CHEVIOT.NS's competition here
RUPA.NS vs CHEVIOT.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, CHEVIOT.BO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while CHEVIOT.BO trades at ₹1,112.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas CHEVIOT.BO's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHEVIOT.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to CHEVIOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check CHEVIOT.BO's competition here
RUPA.NS vs SUTLEJTEX.BO Comparison June 2026
RUPA.NS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RUPA.NS stands at 12.5B. In comparison, SUTLEJTEX.BO has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RUPA.NS is priced at ₹158.87, while SUTLEJTEX.BO trades at ₹37.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RUPA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 17.20, whereas SUTLEJTEX.BO's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, RUPA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUTLEJTEX.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RUPA.NS is more volatile compared to SUTLEJTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RUPA.NS.Check SUTLEJTEX.BO's competition here