Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc.
Electric Last Mile Solutions, Inc. ELMS Peers
See (ELMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Auto - Manufacturers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELMS | $0.19 | N/A | 0 | -0.00 | -$573.89 | N/A |
| TSLA | $348.71 | +8.24% | 1.1T | 200.41 | $1.74 | N/A |
| TM | $170.90 | -0.87% | 223B | 6.85 | $24.94 | +3.16% |
| RACE | $461.09 | +0.44% | 82.2B | 45.65 | $10.10 | +0.64% |
| GM | $48.51 | +0.64% | 46.6B | 6.78 | $7.16 | +1.05% |
| F-PC | $21.17 | +0.28% | 42.2B | N/A | N/A | +7.00% |
| F | $10.74 | +1.42% | 41.9B | 8.59 | $1.25 | +7.00% |
| F-PB | $21.24 | -0.09% | 41.6B | N/A | N/A | +7.00% |
| F-PD | $22.50 | +0.13% | 41.4B | N/A | N/A | +7.00% |
| STLA | $9.36 | -0.53% | 26.8B | 4.44 | $2.11 | +9.58% |
Stock Comparison
ELMS vs TSLA Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, TSLA has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while TSLA trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TSLA's P/E ratio is 200.41. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to TSLA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to TSLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs TM Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, TM has a market cap of 223B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while TM trades at $170.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TM's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to TM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to TM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs RACE Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, RACE has a market cap of 82.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while RACE trades at $461.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RACE's P/E ratio is 45.65. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to RACE's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to RACE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs GM Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, GM has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while GM trades at $48.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GM's P/E ratio is 6.78. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to GM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs F-PC Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, F-PC has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while F-PC trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas F-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to F-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to F-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs F Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, F has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while F trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas F's P/E ratio is 8.59. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to F's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to F. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs F-PB Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, F-PB has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while F-PB trades at $21.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas F-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to F-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to F-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs F-PD Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, F-PD has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while F-PD trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas F-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to F-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to F-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs STLA Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, STLA has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while STLA trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas STLA's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to STLA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to STLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs XPEV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, XPEV has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while XPEV trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas XPEV's P/E ratio is -25.55. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to XPEV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to XPEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs RIVN Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, RIVN has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while RIVN trades at $13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIVN's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to RIVN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to RIVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs LI Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, LI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while LI trades at $28.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LI's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to LI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs HMC Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, HMC has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while HMC trades at $28.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HMC's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to HMC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to HMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs VFS Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, VFS has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while VFS trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to VFS's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to VFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs NIO Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, NIO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while NIO trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NIO's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NIO's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to NIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs LCID Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, LCID has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while LCID trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LCID's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LCID's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to LCID. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs ZK Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, ZK has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while ZK trades at $26.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZK's P/E ratio is -9.19. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ZK's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to ZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs PSNY Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, PSNY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while PSNY trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PSNY's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PSNY's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to PSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs LOT Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, LOT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while LOT trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LOT's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LOT's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to LOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs BLBD Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, BLBD has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while BLBD trades at $42.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas BLBD's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to BLBD's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to BLBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs LVWR Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, LVWR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while LVWR trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LVWR's P/E ratio is -12.09. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LVWR's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to LVWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs NAKD Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, NAKD has a market cap of 682M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while NAKD trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NAKD's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NAKD's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to NAKD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs VFSWW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, VFSWW has a market cap of 631.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while VFSWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VFSWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to VFSWW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to VFSWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs PSNYW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, PSNYW has a market cap of 306M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while PSNYW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PSNYW's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PSNYW's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to PSNYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs NIU Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, NIU has a market cap of 280.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while NIU trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas NIU's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to NIU's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to NIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs FFAI Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, FFAI has a market cap of 134.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while FFAI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFAI's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FFAI's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to FFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs FFIEW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, FFIEW has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while FFIEW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFIEW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FFIEW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to FFIEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs FFIE Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, FFIE has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while FFIE trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFIE's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FFIE's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to FFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs LOTWW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, LOTWW has a market cap of 67.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while LOTWW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LOTWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LOTWW's ROE of +3.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to LOTWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs FSR Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, FSR has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while FSR trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FSR's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FSR's ROE of -2.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to FSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs CJET Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, CJET has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while CJET trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CJET's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CJET's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to CJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs FLYE Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, FLYE has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while FLYE trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FLYE's P/E ratio is -16.04. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FLYE's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to FLYE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs SOLO Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, SOLO has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while SOLO trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SOLO's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SOLO's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to SOLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs CENN Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, CENN has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while CENN trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas CENN's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to CENN's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to CENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs RIDE Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, RIDE has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while RIDE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas RIDE's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to RIDE's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to RIDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs ECDAW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, ECDAW has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while ECDAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ECDAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ECDAW's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is less volatile compared to ECDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs ECDA Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, ECDA has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while ECDA trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ECDA's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ECDA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is less volatile compared to ECDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs GP Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, GP has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while GP trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GP's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GP's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to GP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs PEV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, PEV has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while PEV trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PEV's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PEV's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to PEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs WKHS Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, WKHS has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while WKHS trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas WKHS's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to WKHS's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to WKHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs ARVL Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, ARVL has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while ARVL trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ARVL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ARVL's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to ARVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs SVMH Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, SVMH has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while SVMH trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SVMH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SVMH's ROE of +43.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to SVMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs GOEV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, GOEV has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while GOEV trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GOEV's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GOEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to GOEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs HYZN Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, HYZN has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while HYZN trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas HYZN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to HYZN's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to HYZN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs AIEV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, AIEV has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while AIEV trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AIEV's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to AIEV's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is less volatile compared to AIEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs EVTV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, EVTV has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while EVTV trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EVTV's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to EVTV's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to EVTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs LOBO Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, LOBO has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while LOBO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas LOBO's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to LOBO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to LOBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs DMN Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, DMN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while DMN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas DMN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to DMN's ROE of -48.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is less volatile compared to DMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs AYRO Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, AYRO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while AYRO trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas AYRO's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to AYRO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to AYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs VLCN Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, VLCN has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while VLCN trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to VLCN's ROE of -2.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to VLCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs EGOX Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, EGOX has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while EGOX trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas EGOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to EGOX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to EGOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs FFAIW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, FFAIW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while FFAIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas FFAIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to FFAIW's ROE of -2.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to FFAIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs VEV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, VEV has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while VEV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas VEV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to VEV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is less volatile compared to VEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs MULN Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, MULN has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while MULN trades at $1.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas MULN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to MULN's ROE of +1271.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to MULN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs ZAPP Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, ZAPP has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while ZAPP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ZAPP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ZAPP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is less volatile compared to ZAPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs GOEVW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, GOEVW has a market cap of 365.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while GOEVW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas GOEVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to GOEVW's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to GOEVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs SEV Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, SEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while SEV trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SEV's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SEV's ROE of -5.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to SEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs TTM Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, TTM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while TTM trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas TTM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to TTM's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to TTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs ADOM Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, ADOM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while ADOM trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas ADOM's P/E ratio is -35.00. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to ADOM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to ADOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs SOLOW Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, SOLOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while SOLOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas SOLOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to SOLOW's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to SOLOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.
ELMS vs PTRA Comparison
ELMS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ELMS stands at 0. In comparison, PTRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ELMS is priced at $0.19, while PTRA trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ELMS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.00, whereas PTRA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ELMS's ROE is -0.71%, compared to PTRA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ELMS is more volatile compared to PTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ELMS.