Ecopetrol S.A.

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, XOM has a market cap of 669.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while XOM trades at $160.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas XOM's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XOM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to XOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check XOM's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CVX has a market cap of 397.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while CVX trades at $198.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CVX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVX's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to CVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check CVX's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SHEL has a market cap of 265B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while SHEL trades at $93.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SHEL's P/E ratio is 15.52. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to SHEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check SHEL's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TTE has a market cap of 205.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while TTE trades at $92.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TTE's P/E ratio is 15.98. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TTE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to TTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check TTE's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PBR has a market cap of 132.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while PBR trades at $20.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PBR's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to PBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check PBR's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, BP has a market cap of 123.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while BP trades at $47.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BP's P/E ratio is 2356.00. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to BP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check BP's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PBR-A has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while PBR-A trades at $18.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PBR-A's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PBR-A's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to PBR-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check PBR-A's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, EQNR has a market cap of 105.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while EQNR trades at $41.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas EQNR's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EQNR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to EQNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check EQNR's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, E has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while E trades at $57.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas E's P/E ratio is 31.55. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to E's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to E. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check E's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SU has a market cap of 78.5B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while SU trades at $65.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SU's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SU's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to SU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check SU's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, IMO has a market cap of 64.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while IMO trades at $130.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas IMO's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to IMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check IMO's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CVE has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while CVE trades at $26.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CVE's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to CVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check CVE's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, YPF has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while YPF trades at $45.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas YPF's P/E ratio is -21.43. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to YPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to YPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check YPF's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, NFG has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while NFG trades at $94.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NFG's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NFG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to NFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check NFG's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TGS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while TGS trades at $35.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TGS's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to TGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check TGS's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TANNZ has a market cap of 999.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while TANNZ trades at $25.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TANNZ's P/E ratio is 35.23. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TANNZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to TANNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check TANNZ's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SLNG has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while SLNG trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SLNG's P/E ratio is -66.00. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLNG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is less volatile compared to SLNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check SLNG's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CGBS has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while CGBS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CGBS's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGBS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is less volatile compared to CGBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check CGBS's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SKYQ has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while SKYQ trades at $5.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SKYQ's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKYQ's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is less volatile compared to SKYQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check SKYQ's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, ZEST has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while ZEST trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ZEST's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZEST's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is less volatile compared to ZEST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check ZEST's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, CGBSW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while CGBSW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CGBSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CGBSW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to CGBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check CGBSW's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, RDS-B has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while RDS-B trades at $51.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RDS-B's P/E ratio is 42.98. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDS-B's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to RDS-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check RDS-B's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, RDS-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while RDS-A trades at $51.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RDS-A's P/E ratio is 42.96. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDS-A's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to RDS-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check RDS-A's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, SNP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while SNP trades at $45.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SNP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SNP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to SNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check SNP's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, PTR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while PTR trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PTR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to PTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check PTR's competition here

EC plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, EC stands at 31.1B. In comparison, TELZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EC is priced at $15.14, while TELZ trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

EC currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TELZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EC's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TELZ's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EC is more volatile compared to TELZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EC.Check TELZ's competition here