Fangdd Network Group Ltd.
Fangdd Network Group Ltd. DUO Peers
See (DUO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUO | $2.25 | -3.02% | 15.7M | 0.29 | $7.69 | N/A |
| CBRE | $144.63 | +1.09% | 43.1B | 44.09 | $3.28 | N/A |
| CSGP | $91.00 | +6.86% | 38.4B | 350.00 | $0.26 | N/A |
| JLL | $260.80 | +0.29% | 12.4B | 23.56 | $11.08 | N/A |
| FSV | $179.06 | -0.33% | 8.1B | 61.96 | $2.89 | +0.59% |
| BEKE | $19.58 | +1.29% | 7.4B | 36.96 | $0.53 | +1.84% |
| CIGI | $139.89 | -0.16% | 6.9B | 48.57 | $2.88 | +0.21% |
| BPYPP | $14.44 | -1.16% | 5.3B | 6.58 | $2.20 | +11.15% |
| BPYPO | $14.30 | -0.69% | 5.3B | 6.56 | $2.20 | +11.15% |
| BPYPN | $12.96 | -0.49% | 4.8B | 5.90 | $2.20 | +11.15% |
Stock Comparison
DUO vs CBRE Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while CBRE trades at $144.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs CSGP Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while CSGP trades at $91.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs JLL Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while JLL trades at $260.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 23.56. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs FSV Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while FSV trades at $179.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 61.96. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs BEKE Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while BEKE trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 36.96. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs CIGI Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while CIGI trades at $139.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 48.57. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs BPYPP Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while BPYPP trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs BPYPO Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while BPYPO trades at $14.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.56. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs BPYPN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while BPYPN trades at $12.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs TCN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs CWK Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CWK has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while CWK trades at $11.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CWK's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CWK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to CWK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs NMRK Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while NMRK trades at $13.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 34.92. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs EXPI Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while EXPI trades at $11.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -124.78. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs OPEN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while OPEN trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs RDFN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs RLGY Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs MMI Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while MMI trades at $31.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -184.18. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs PGRU Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs KW Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while KW trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs REAX Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 890.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while REAX trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -61.71. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs INDT Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs QK Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs RMR Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 539.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while RMR trades at $16.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs HOUS Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 525.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while HOUS trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs FRPH Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 524.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while FRPH trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 76.36. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs TCI Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while TCI trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 46.09. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs MLP Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 359.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while MLP trades at $18.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs RMAX Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 345M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while RMAX trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs SEG Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 297.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while SEG trades at $23.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.11. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs FLJ Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLJ's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs NEN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 255.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while NEN trades at $73.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs DOUG Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 248.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while DOUG trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs CIAN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs OPAD-WT Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs ASPS Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 139.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while ASPS trades at $12.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LODE Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 125.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LODE trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LODE's ROE of -138743.50%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs STHO Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 105.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while STHO trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs DOMA Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs MAYS Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 76.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while MAYS trades at $38.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1269.67. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs RFL Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 73.8M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while RFL trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs OPAD Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while OPAD trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs WE Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs FTHM Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 40M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while FTHM trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs CHG Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHG's ROE of +3.50%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs OMH Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while OMH trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LGPS Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 25.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LGPS trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs AIRE Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while AIRE trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -2.42%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs GYRO Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while GYRO trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 45.49. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LEJU Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs WETH Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while WETH trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.41. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LRHC Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LRHC trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +5.61%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs AVCO Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs GBR Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while GBR trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -33.00. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs ALBT Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while ALBT trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -2.77%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs UOKA Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while UOKA trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs MDJH Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs UKOMW Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs UK Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while UK trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs SFRWW Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs SFR Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs XHG Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.8K. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while XHG trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LMRKP Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs OBAS Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LMRK Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs IRCP Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs BPY Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LMRKN Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs LMRKO Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.
DUO vs NTP Comparison
DUO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUO stands at 15.7M. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, DUO is priced at $2.25, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUO currently has a P/E ratio of 0.29, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, DUO's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUO is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUO.