Duke Energy Corporation
Duke Energy Corporation DUK-PA Peers
See (DUK-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Stock Comparison
DUK-PA vs HPIFY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HPIFY has a market cap of 227.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HPIFY trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HPIFY's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPIFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to HPIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NEE-PN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NEE-PN has a market cap of 137.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NEE-PN trades at $22.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NEE-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NEE-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NEE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NEE has a market cap of 136.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NEE trades at $66.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NEE's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SOJE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SOJE has a market cap of 100.93B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SOJE trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SOJE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SOJE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SO has a market cap of 100.36B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SO trades at $91.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SO's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SOJC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SOJC has a market cap of 100.16B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SOJC trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SOJC's P/E ratio is 25.56. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SOJC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SOJD Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SOJD has a market cap of 99.37B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SOJD trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SOJD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SOJD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SOJD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DUK Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DUK has a market cap of 95.39B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DUK trades at $122.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DUK's P/E ratio is 21.54. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DUK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DUKB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DUKB has a market cap of 94.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DUKB trades at $24.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DUKB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DUKB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DUKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NEE-PR Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NEE-PR has a market cap of 79.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NEE-PR trades at $38.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NEE-PR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NEE-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NGGTF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NGGTF has a market cap of 72.29B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NGGTF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NGGTF's P/E ratio is 27.31. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGGTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NGGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NGG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NGG has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NGG trades at $72.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NGG's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AEP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AEP has a market cap of 59.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AEP trades at $107.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AEP's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SREA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SREA has a market cap of 49.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SREA trades at $20.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SREA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SREA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SREA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EXC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EXC has a market cap of 46.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EXC trades at $46.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EXC's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs D Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, D has a market cap of 46.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while D trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas D's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to D's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to D. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EXCVV Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EXCVV has a market cap of 41.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EXCVV trades at $41.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EXCVV's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXCVV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EXCVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs XEL Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, XEL has a market cap of 40.98B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while XEL trades at $71.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas XEL's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to XEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ED Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ED has a market cap of 39.79B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ED trades at $110.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ED's P/E ratio is 21.08. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ED's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PEG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PEG has a market cap of 39.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PEG trades at $79.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PEG's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PEG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG has a market cap of 37.43B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ELC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ELC has a market cap of 36.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ELC trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ELC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ELC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ETR Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ETR has a market cap of 36.33B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ETR trades at $83.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ETR's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs WEC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, WEC has a market cap of 35.02B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while WEC trades at $109.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas WEC's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WEC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to WEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ELEZY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ELEZY has a market cap of 31.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ELEZY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ELEZY's P/E ratio is 14.92. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ELEZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ELEZF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ELEZF has a market cap of 29.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ELEZF trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ELEZF's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELEZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to ELEZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTE has a market cap of 28.57B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTE trades at $137.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTE's P/E ratio is 18.61. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTG has a market cap of 28.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTG trades at $17.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTB has a market cap of 28.23B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTB trades at $17.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTW Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTW has a market cap of 28.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTW trades at $21.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTW's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTW's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NSARO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NSARO has a market cap of 27.32B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NSARO trades at $76.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NSARO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSARO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NSARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AEE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AEE has a market cap of 26.86B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AEE trades at $99.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AEE's P/E ratio is 22.04. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PPL Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PPL has a market cap of 26.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PPL trades at $36.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PPL's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PPL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NSARP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NSARP has a market cap of 25.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NSARP trades at $71.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NSARP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NSARP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to NSARP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs FE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, FE has a market cap of 24.90B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while FE trades at $43.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas FE's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to FE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs FTS Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, FTS has a market cap of 24.59B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while FTS trades at $49.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas FTS's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to FTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTY has a market cap of 22.65B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTY trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTY's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to DTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HRNNF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HRNNF has a market cap of 22.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HRNNF trades at $37.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HRNNF's P/E ratio is 26.98. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRNNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HRNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CMS Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CMS has a market cap of 21.94B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CMS trades at $73.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CMS's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CMSA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CMSA has a market cap of 21.89B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CMSA trades at $21.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CMSA's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CMSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CLPHY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CLPHY has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CLPHY trades at $8.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CLPHY's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CLPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CMSD Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CMSD has a market cap of 21.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CMSD trades at $22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CMSD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CMSD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ES Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ES has a market cap of 21.74B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ES trades at $59.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ES's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ES's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CMSC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CMSC has a market cap of 21.68B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CMSC trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CMSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMSC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CMSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CLPHF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CLPHF has a market cap of 21.58B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CLPHF trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CLPHF's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CLPHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CLPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EIX Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EIX has a market cap of 21.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EIX trades at $54.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EIX's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EIX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs TERRF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, TERRF has a market cap of 19.96B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while TERRF trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas TERRF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TERRF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to TERRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AQNB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AQNB has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AQNB trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AQNB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AQNB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to AQNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs MAEOY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, MAEOY has a market cap of 18.43B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while MAEOY trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas MAEOY's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MAEOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to MAEOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AILIO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AILIO has a market cap of 18.34B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AILIO trades at $67.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AILIO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AILIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs TNABF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, TNABF has a market cap of 18.01B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while TNABF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas TNABF's P/E ratio is 16.26. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNABF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to TNABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EBR-B Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EBR-B has a market cap of 17.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EBR-B trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EBR-B's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBR-B's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EBR-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EBR Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EBR has a market cap of 17.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EBR trades at $7.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EBR's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EBR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs TNABY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, TNABY has a market cap of 17.27B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while TNABY trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas TNABY's P/E ratio is 15.80. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNABY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to TNABY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CKISF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CKISF has a market cap of 16.50B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CKISF trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CKISF's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKISF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CKISF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CKISY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CKISY has a market cap of 16.14B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CKISY trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CKISY's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CKISY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CKISY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EVRG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EVRG has a market cap of 15.93B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EVRG trades at $69.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EVRG's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVRG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EVRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs LNT Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, LNT has a market cap of 15.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while LNT trades at $61.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas LNT's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LNT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to LNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AGR Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AGR has a market cap of 13.94B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AGR trades at $36.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AGR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EMRAF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EMRAF has a market cap of 13.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EMRAF trades at $43.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EMRAF's P/E ratio is 35.37. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to EMRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs KEP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, KEP has a market cap of 12.06B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while KEP trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas KEP's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KEP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to KEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PNW Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PNW has a market cap of 11.14B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PNW trades at $93.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PNW's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs RDEIY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, RDEIY has a market cap of 10.92B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while RDEIY trades at $10.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas RDEIY's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RDEIY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to RDEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ELIAF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ELIAF has a market cap of 10.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ELIAF trades at $92.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ELIAF's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ELIAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ELIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPCO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPCO has a market cap of 9.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPCO trades at $90.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPCO's P/E ratio is 17.76. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to UEPCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs OGE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, OGE has a market cap of 9.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while OGE trades at $45.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas OGE's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OGE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to OGE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs FTRSF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, FTRSF has a market cap of 8.00B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while FTRSF trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas FTRSF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTRSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to FTRSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EQUEY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EQUEY has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EQUEY trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EQUEY's P/E ratio is 15.60. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EQUEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EQUEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HPIFF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HPIFF has a market cap of 7.81B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HPIFF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HPIFF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HPIFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HPIFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPCN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPCN has a market cap of 7.73B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPCN trades at $75.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPCN's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to UEPCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPEO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPEO has a market cap of 7.57B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPEO trades at $74.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPEO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to UEPEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPEP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPEP has a market cap of 7.55B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPEP trades at $73.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPEP's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to UEPEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPCP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPCP has a market cap of 7.09B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPCP trades at $69.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPCP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to UEPCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs FORFF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, FORFF has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while FORFF trades at $14.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas FORFF's P/E ratio is 7.13. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FORFF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to FORFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs TEZNY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, TEZNY has a market cap of 6.65B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while TEZNY trades at $29.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas TEZNY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TEZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to TEZNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPEM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPEM has a market cap of 6.50B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPEM trades at $63.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPEM's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to UEPEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HKVTY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HKVTY has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HKVTY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HKVTY's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKVTY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to HKVTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CMS-PB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CMS-PB has a market cap of 6.31B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CMS-PB trades at $75.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CMS-PB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CMS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IDA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IDA has a market cap of 6.30B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IDA trades at $116.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IDA's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IDA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to IDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EGIEY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EGIEY has a market cap of 6.24B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EGIEY trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EGIEY's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EGIEY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to EGIEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs UEPEN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, UEPEN has a market cap of 6.23B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while UEPEN trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas UEPEN's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UEPEN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to UEPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCG-PA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG-PA has a market cap of 5.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG-PA trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG-PA's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PCG-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HKCVF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HKCVF has a market cap of 5.92B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HKCVF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HKCVF's P/E ratio is 13.40. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HKCVF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HKCVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CPWIF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CPWIF has a market cap of 5.44B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CPWIF trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CPWIF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CPWIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CPWIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IESFY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IESFY has a market cap of 5.32B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IESFY trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IESFY's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IESFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to IESFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ENIC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ENIC has a market cap of 5.26B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ENIC trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ENIC's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ENIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCG-PB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG-PB has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG-PB trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG-PB's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to PCG-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CMS-PC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CMS-PC has a market cap of 5.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CMS-PC trades at $17.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CMS-PC's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CMS-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CMS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs TXNM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, TXNM has a market cap of 4.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while TXNM trades at $52.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas TXNM's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TXNM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to TXNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCG-PC Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG-PC has a market cap of 4.83B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG-PC trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG-PC's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to PCG-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCG-PE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG-PE has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG-PE trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG-PE's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA and PCG-PE have similar daily volatility (0.39).
DUK-PA vs PCG-PD Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG-PD has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG-PD trades at $17.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG-PD's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PCG-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs POR Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, POR has a market cap of 4.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while POR trades at $42.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas POR's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to POR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to POR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCG-PG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCG-PG has a market cap of 4.61B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCG-PG trades at $17.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCG-PG's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCG-PG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to PCG-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTJ Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTJ has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTJ trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTJ's P/E ratio is 4.12. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTJ's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to DTJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs OKLO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, OKLO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while OKLO trades at $28.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas OKLO's P/E ratio is -38.78. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to OKLO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to OKLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ABOIF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ABOIF has a market cap of 3.80B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ABOIF trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ABOIF's P/E ratio is 9.77. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABOIF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to ABOIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PNM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PNM has a market cap of 3.77B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PNM trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PNM's P/E ratio is 46.41. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PNM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs WELPM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, WELPM has a market cap of 3.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while WELPM trades at $110.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas WELPM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELPM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to WELPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs RGPCF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, RGPCF has a market cap of 2.60B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while RGPCF trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas RGPCF's P/E ratio is 14.13. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGPCF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to RGPCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs WELPP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, WELPP has a market cap of 2.13B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while WELPP trades at $64.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas WELPP's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WELPP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to WELPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AILLM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AILLM has a market cap of 1.99B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AILLM trades at $78.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AILLM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AILLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AILLN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AILLN has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AILLN trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AILLN's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AILLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AILIN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AILIN has a market cap of 1.85B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AILIN trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AILIN's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to AILIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWLM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWLM has a market cap of 1.79B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWLM trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLM's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to HAWLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PGPKY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PGPKY has a market cap of 1.75B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PGPKY trades at $3.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PGPKY's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PGPKY's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to PGPKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AILLP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AILLP has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AILLP trades at $65.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AILLP's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILLP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AILLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CEPU Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CEPU has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CEPU trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CEPU's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CEPU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CEPU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EDN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EDN has a market cap of 1.41B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EDN trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EDN's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDN's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ETI-P Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ETI-P has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ETI-P trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ETI-P's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ETI-P's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ETI-P. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EAI Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EAI has a market cap of 979.77M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EAI trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EAI's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EAI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to EAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs FPHHF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, FPHHF has a market cap of 644.38M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while FPHHF trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas FPHHF's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FPHHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to FPHHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CUPUF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CUPUF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CUPUF trades at $12.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CUPUF's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CUPUF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CUPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs RELFF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, RELFF has a market cap of 461.63M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while RELFF trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas RELFF's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RELFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to RELFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SPKE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SPKE has a market cap of 431.58M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SPKE trades at $11.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SPKE's P/E ratio is 19.47. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKE's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SPKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs GNE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, GNE has a market cap of 424.59M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while GNE trades at $15.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas GNE's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to GNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SPKEP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SPKEP has a market cap of 409.91M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SPKEP trades at $25.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SPKEP's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SPKEP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SPKEP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLPL Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLPL has a market cap of 312.86M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLPL trades at $51.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLPL's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLPL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNTHP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNTHP has a market cap of 311.42M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNTHP trades at $51.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNTHP's P/E ratio is 0.69. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNTHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs GNE-PA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, GNE-PA has a market cap of 291.55M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while GNE-PA trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas GNE-PA's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GNE-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to GNE-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ABTZY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ABTZY has a market cap of 289.86M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ABTZY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ABTZY's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABTZY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ABTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ABZPF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ABZPF has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ABZPF trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ABZPF's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABZPF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to ABZPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ABZPY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ABZPY has a market cap of 261.21M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ABZPY trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ABZPY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ABZPY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ABZPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNTHO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNTHO has a market cap of 259.51M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNTHO trades at $43.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNTHO's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNTHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNTHN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNTHN has a market cap of 239.90M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNTHN trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNTHN's P/E ratio is 0.53. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNTHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNTHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWEN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWEN has a market cap of 232.29M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWEN trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEN's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to HAWEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLHO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLHO has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLHO trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLHO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLHP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLHP has a market cap of 229.34M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLHP trades at $38.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLHP's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWEL Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWEL has a market cap of 229.20M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWEL trades at $14.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEL's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HAWEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLTP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLTP has a market cap of 217.27M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLTP trades at $36.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLTP's P/E ratio is 0.48. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CNLTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWLN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWLN has a market cap of 208.26M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWLN trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLN's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HAWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs GPJA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, GPJA has a market cap of 204.68M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while GPJA trades at $22.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas GPJA's P/E ratio is 0.14. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GPJA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to GPJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLTN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLTN has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLTN trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLTN's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLPM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLPM has a market cap of 199.16M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLPM trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLPM's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLPM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLHN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLHN has a market cap of 188.36M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLHN trades at $31.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLHN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLHN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ENO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ENO has a market cap of 185.00M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ENO trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ENO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ENO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNLTL Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNLTL has a market cap of 184.50M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNLTL trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNLTL's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNLTL's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to CNLTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EMP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EMP has a market cap of 178.87M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EMP trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EMP's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EMP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ENJ Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ENJ has a market cap of 169.97M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ENJ trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ENJ's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ENJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EDCFF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EDCFF has a market cap of 106.70M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EDCFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EDCFF's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EDCFF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EDCFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs VIASP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, VIASP has a market cap of 91.15M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while VIASP trades at $24.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas VIASP's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIASP's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to VIASP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs VIA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, VIA has a market cap of 79.52M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while VIA trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas VIA's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VIA's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to VIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NZWFF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NZWFF has a market cap of 46.84M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NZWFF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NZWFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NZWFF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to NZWFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs SUME Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, SUME has a market cap of 22.81M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while SUME trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas SUME's P/E ratio is 4.13. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SUME's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to SUME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs MCPB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, MCPB has a market cap of 4.60M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while MCPB trades at $23.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas MCPB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MCPB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to MCPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EUSP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EUSP has a market cap of 4.11M. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EUSP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EUSP's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EUSP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EUSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWEM Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWEM has a market cap of 722498.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWEM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWEM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWEM's ROE of -0.76%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HAWEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs RIGH Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, RIGH has a market cap of 158566.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while RIGH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas RIGH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RIGH's ROE of +2.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to RIGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs USWF Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, USWF has a market cap of 47092.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while USWF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas USWF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to USWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to USWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EPGRQ Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EPGRQ has a market cap of 1571.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EPGRQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EPGRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EPGRQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EPGRQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs RENU Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, RENU has a market cap of 300.00. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while RENU trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas RENU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RENU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to RENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWLL Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWLL comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWLL trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HAWLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ALP-PQ Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ALP-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ALP-PQ trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ALP-PQ's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALP-PQ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ALP-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs CNP-PB Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, CNP-PB comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while CNP-PB trades at $46.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas CNP-PB's P/E ratio is 42.64. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CNP-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to CNP-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AEPPZ Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AEPPZ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AEPPZ trades at $47.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AEPPZ's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AEPPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to AEPPZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DTP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DTP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DTP trades at $51.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DTP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DTP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DTP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IPWLO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IPWLO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IPWLO trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IPWLO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to IPWLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IPWLG Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IPWLG comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IPWLG trades at $84.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IPWLG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to IPWLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PCGU Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PCGU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PCGU trades at $145.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PCGU's P/E ratio is 1188.52. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PCGU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PCGU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs HAWLI Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, HAWLI comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while HAWLI trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas HAWLI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HAWLI's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to HAWLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs BANGN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, BANGN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while BANGN trades at $98.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas BANGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BANGN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to BANGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ENIA Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ENIA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ENIA trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ENIA's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ENIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NMPWP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NMPWP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NMPWP trades at $56.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NMPWP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NMPWP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NMPWP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IPWLN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IPWLN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IPWLN trades at $85.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IPWLN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to IPWLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs PNMXO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, PNMXO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while PNMXO trades at $74.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas PNMXO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PNMXO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to PNMXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs AILIP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, AILIP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while AILIP trades at $66.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas AILIP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AILIP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to AILIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs DCUE Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, DCUE comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while DCUE trades at $101.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas DCUE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DCUE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to DCUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs EVSO Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, EVSO comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while EVSO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas EVSO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EVSO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to EVSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NEE-PP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NEE-PP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NEE-PP trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NEE-PP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NEE-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs ENIAY Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, ENIAY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while ENIAY trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas ENIAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ENIAY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to ENIAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NEWEN Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NEWEN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NEWEN trades at $126.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NEWEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEWEN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to NEWEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IPWLP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IPWLP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IPWLP trades at $118.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IPWLP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPWLP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to IPWLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs IPLDP Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, IPLDP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while IPLDP trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas IPLDP's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPLDP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is more volatile compared to IPLDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
DUK-PA vs NEE-PQ Comparison
DUK-PA plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, DUK-PA stands at 93.99B. In comparison, NEE-PQ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DUK-PA is priced at $25.01, while NEE-PQ trades at $45.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
DUK-PA currently has a P/E ratio of 5.25, whereas NEE-PQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DUK-PA's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEE-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DUK-PA is less volatile compared to NEE-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DUK-PA.
Peer Comparison Table: Regulated Electric Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HPIFY | $15.70 | +4.60% | 227.95B | 8.40 | $1.87 | +6.18% |
| NEE-PN | $22.89 | +0.02% | 137.66B | N/A | N/A | +3.19% |
| NEE | $66.53 | +0.64% | 136.95B | 24.92 | $2.67 | +3.19% |
| SOJE | $17.64 | +0.86% | 100.93B | N/A | N/A | +3.16% |
| SO | $91.22 | +0.19% | 100.36B | 21.88 | $4.17 | +3.16% |
| SOJC | $21.47 | +0.23% | 100.16B | 25.56 | $0.84 | +3.16% |
| SOJD | $19.85 | -0.30% | 99.37B | N/A | N/A | +3.16% |
| DUK | $122.76 | +1.66% | 95.39B | 21.54 | $5.70 | +3.44% |
| DUKB | $24.67 | +0.04% | 94.51B | N/A | N/A | +3.44% |
| DUK-PA | $25.01 | +0.15% | 93.99B | 5.25 | $4.76 | +3.44% |