Deckers Outdoor Corporation

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, NKE has a market cap of 86.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while NKE trades at $58.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas NKE's P/E ratio is 19.37. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to NKE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to NKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, ADDDF has a market cap of 42.48B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while ADDDF trades at $237.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ADDDF's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ADDDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to ADDDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, ADDYY has a market cap of 42.04B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while ADDYY trades at $117.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ADDYY's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ADDYY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to ADDYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, ASCCY has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while ASCCY trades at $22.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ASCCY's P/E ratio is 37.35. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASCCY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to ASCCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, ASCCF has a market cap of 14.15B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while ASCCF trades at $20.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ASCCF's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ASCCF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to ASCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, BIRK has a market cap of 9.88B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while BIRK trades at $52.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas BIRK's P/E ratio is 39.84. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BIRK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to BIRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 7.95B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while BCUCF trades at $117.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, SKX has a market cap of 7.03B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while SKX trades at $46.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SKX's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SKX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SKX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, CROX has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while CROX trades at $109.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CROX's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CROX's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to CROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, PUMSY has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while PUMSY trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PUMSY's P/E ratio is 11.95. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PUMSY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to PUMSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, PMMAF has a market cap of 3.72B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while PMMAF trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PMMAF's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PMMAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to PMMAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, YUEIF has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while YUEIF trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas YUEIF's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to YUEIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to YUEIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, SMSEY has a market cap of 2.62B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while SMSEY trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SMSEY's P/E ratio is 7.88. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SMSEY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to SMSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, SMSOF has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while SMSOF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SMSOF's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SMSOF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SMSOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, YUEIY has a market cap of 2.47B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while YUEIY trades at $7.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas YUEIY's P/E ratio is 6.31. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to YUEIY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to YUEIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, HUGPF has a market cap of 2.40B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while HUGPF trades at $34.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas HUGPF's P/E ratio is 9.97. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to HUGPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to HUGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, SHOO has a market cap of 2.10B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while SHOO trades at $29.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SHOO's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SHOO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SHOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, SLNLY has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while SLNLY trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SLNLY's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SLNLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SLNLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, TODGF has a market cap of 1.54B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while TODGF trades at $37.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TODGF's P/E ratio is 21.39. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TODGF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to TODGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, WWW has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while WWW trades at $15.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas WWW's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to WWW's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to WWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, FXWZF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while FXWZF trades at $30.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas FXWZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FXWZF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to FXWZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, TSIOF has a market cap of 1.12B. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while TSIOF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TSIOF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TSIOF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to TSIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, DOCMF has a market cap of 708.63M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while DOCMF trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas DOCMF's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DOCMF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to DOCMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, DRMTY has a market cap of 699.37M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while DRMTY trades at $1.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas DRMTY's P/E ratio is 18.13. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DRMTY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to DRMTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, CAL has a market cap of 513.77M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while CAL trades at $15.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CAL's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CAL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to CAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, WEYS has a market cap of 314.23M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while WEYS trades at $32.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas WEYS's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to WEYS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to WEYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, GXSBY has a market cap of 183.98M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while GXSBY trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas GXSBY's P/E ratio is -11.86. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GXSBY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to GXSBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, GXSBF has a market cap of 155.08M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while GXSBF trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas GXSBF's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GXSBF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to GXSBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, RCKY has a market cap of 152.36M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while RCKY trades at $20.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RCKY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RCKY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to RCKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, TDPAY has a market cap of 151.05M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while TDPAY trades at $4.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TDPAY's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TDPAY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to TDPAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, MCRAA has a market cap of 109.40M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while MCRAA trades at $47.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MCRAA's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MCRAA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to MCRAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, MCRAB has a market cap of 108.82M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while MCRAB trades at $47.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas MCRAB's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to MCRAB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to MCRAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, DPNEY has a market cap of 92.00M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while DPNEY trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas DPNEY's P/E ratio is 6.20. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DPNEY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to DPNEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, VRA has a market cap of 52.21M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while VRA trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas VRA's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to VRA's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to VRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, DPNEF has a market cap of 39.57M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while DPNEF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas DPNEF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to DPNEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to DPNEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, KMSWF has a market cap of 33.25M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while KMSWF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas KMSWF's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to KMSWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to KMSWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, BSHI has a market cap of 32.01M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while BSHI trades at $15.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas BSHI's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to BSHI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to BSHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, GVSI has a market cap of 13.23M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while GVSI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas GVSI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to GVSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to GVSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, TIEMF has a market cap of 11.89M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while TIEMF trades at $4.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas TIEMF's P/E ratio is 35.04. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to TIEMF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to TIEMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, FORD has a market cap of 8.62M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while FORD trades at $7.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas FORD's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to FORD's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to FORD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, AREBW has a market cap of 7.71M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while AREBW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AREBW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AREBW's ROE of +20.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to AREBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, AREB has a market cap of 6.66M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while AREB trades at $2.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas AREB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to AREB's ROE of +20.05%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to AREB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, CHSH has a market cap of 1.19M. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while CHSH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas CHSH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to CHSH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to CHSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, SAML has a market cap of 470208.00. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while SAML trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas SAML's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to SAML's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to SAML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, ATYM has a market cap of 265707.00. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while ATYM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas ATYM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to ATYM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to ATYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, RBNW has a market cap of 187833.00. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while RBNW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas RBNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to RBNW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is less volatile compared to RBNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, PXFG has a market cap of 81780.00. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while PXFG trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas PXFG's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to PXFG's ROE of -5.99%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to PXFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, QING has a market cap of 1212.00. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while QING trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas QING's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to QING's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to QING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.

DECK plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, DECK stands at 18.38B. In comparison, LESAF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, DECK is priced at $121.07, while LESAF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

DECK currently has a P/E ratio of 19.65, whereas LESAF's P/E ratio is 2.37. In terms of profitability, DECK's ROE is +0.42%, compared to LESAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, DECK is more volatile compared to LESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for DECK.