Cushman & Wakefield plc
Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CWK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Real Estate - Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWK | $15.99 | +2.63% | 3.7B | 18.17 | $0.88 | N/A |
| CBRE | $164.98 | +0.35% | 49.1B | 46.23 | $3.57 | N/A |
| CSGP | $90.51 | -0.78% | 38.3B | 348.12 | $0.26 | N/A |
| JLL | $304.50 | +0.43% | 14.4B | 26.16 | $11.64 | N/A |
| FSV | $200.25 | +0.23% | 9.1B | 64.18 | $3.12 | +0.53% |
| CIGI | $169.02 | +0.89% | 8.3B | 75.79 | $2.23 | +0.18% |
| BEKE | $18.82 | +1.57% | 7.1B | 35.49 | $0.53 | +1.90% |
| BPYPP | $15.34 | +1.19% | 5.6B | 6.98 | $2.20 | +10.65% |
| BPYPO | $14.96 | +1.27% | 5.5B | 6.81 | $2.20 | +10.65% |
| BPYPN | $13.63 | -0.73% | 5B | 6.16 | $2.20 | +10.65% |
Stock Comparison
CWK vs CBRE Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CBRE has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while CBRE trades at $164.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas CBRE's P/E ratio is 46.23. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBRE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to CBRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check CBRE's competition here
CWK vs CSGP Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CSGP has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while CSGP trades at $90.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas CSGP's P/E ratio is 348.12. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to CSGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check CSGP's competition here
CWK vs JLL Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, JLL has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while JLL trades at $304.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas JLL's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JLL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to JLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check JLL's competition here
CWK vs FSV Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FSV has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while FSV trades at $200.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas FSV's P/E ratio is 64.18. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to FSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check FSV's competition here
CWK vs CIGI Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CIGI has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while CIGI trades at $169.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas CIGI's P/E ratio is 75.79. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIGI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to CIGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check CIGI's competition here
CWK vs BEKE Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BEKE has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while BEKE trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BEKE's P/E ratio is 35.49. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BEKE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to BEKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check BEKE's competition here
CWK vs BPYPP Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BPYPP has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while BPYPP trades at $15.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BPYPP's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to BPYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check BPYPP's competition here
CWK vs BPYPO Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BPYPO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while BPYPO trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BPYPO's P/E ratio is 6.81. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to BPYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check BPYPO's competition here
CWK vs BPYPN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BPYPN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while BPYPN trades at $13.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BPYPN's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPYPN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to BPYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check BPYPN's competition here
CWK vs OPEN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OPEN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while OPEN trades at $4.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OPEN's P/E ratio is -10.56. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPEN's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to OPEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check OPEN's competition here
CWK vs NMRK Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NMRK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while NMRK trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas NMRK's P/E ratio is 44.85. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NMRK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to NMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check NMRK's competition here
CWK vs TCN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TCN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while TCN trades at $11.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas TCN's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to TCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check TCN's competition here
CWK vs EXPI Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, EXPI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while EXPI trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas EXPI's P/E ratio is -58.32. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXPI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to EXPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check EXPI's competition here
CWK vs RDFN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RDFN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while RDFN trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas RDFN's P/E ratio is -7.36. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RDFN's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to RDFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check RDFN's competition here
CWK vs RLGY Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RLGY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while RLGY trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas RLGY's P/E ratio is 4.59. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RLGY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to RLGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check RLGY's competition here
CWK vs MMI Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MMI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while MMI trades at $32.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas MMI's P/E ratio is -101.77. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to MMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check MMI's competition here
CWK vs KW Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, KW has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while KW trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas KW's P/E ratio is -12.57. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to KW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check KW's competition here
CWK vs PGRU Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, PGRU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while PGRU trades at $6.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas PGRU's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PGRU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to PGRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check PGRU's competition here
CWK vs REAX Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, REAX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while REAX trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas REAX's P/E ratio is -71.86. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REAX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to REAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check REAX's competition here
CWK vs INDT Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, INDT has a market cap of 683.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while INDT trades at $66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas INDT's P/E ratio is -209.34. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INDT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to INDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check INDT's competition here
CWK vs HOUS Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, HOUS has a market cap of 680.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while HOUS trades at $6.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas HOUS's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HOUS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to HOUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check HOUS's competition here
CWK vs QK Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, QK has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while QK trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas QK's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QK's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to QK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check QK's competition here
CWK vs RMR Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RMR has a market cap of 533.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while RMR trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas RMR's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to RMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check RMR's competition here
CWK vs FRPH Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FRPH has a market cap of 484.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while FRPH trades at $25.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas FRPH's P/E ratio is 90.54. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRPH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to FRPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check FRPH's competition here
CWK vs TCI Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, TCI has a market cap of 413.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while TCI trades at $47.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas TCI's P/E ratio is 63.04. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to TCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check TCI's competition here
CWK vs MLP Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MLP has a market cap of 330.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while MLP trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas MLP's P/E ratio is -23.59. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MLP's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to MLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check MLP's competition here
CWK vs SEG Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SEG has a market cap of 323.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while SEG trades at $25.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SEG's P/E ratio is -2.68. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SEG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to SEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check SEG's competition here
CWK vs FLJ Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FLJ has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while FLJ trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas FLJ's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FLJ's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to FLJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check FLJ's competition here
CWK vs NEN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NEN has a market cap of 248.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while NEN trades at $71.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas NEN's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to NEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check NEN's competition here
CWK vs DOUG Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DOUG has a market cap of 239.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while DOUG trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas DOUG's P/E ratio is -3.70. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOUG's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to DOUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check DOUG's competition here
CWK vs CIAN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CIAN has a market cap of 237.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while CIAN trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas CIAN's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIAN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to CIAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check CIAN's competition here
CWK vs OPAD-WT Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OPAD-WT has a market cap of 234.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while OPAD-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OPAD-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD-WT's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to OPAD-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check OPAD-WT's competition here
CWK vs RMAX Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RMAX has a market cap of 189.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while RMAX trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas RMAX's P/E ratio is 19.27. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RMAX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to RMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check RMAX's competition here
CWK vs ASPS Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ASPS has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while ASPS trades at $11.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas ASPS's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASPS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to ASPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check ASPS's competition here
CWK vs STHO Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, STHO has a market cap of 113.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while STHO trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas STHO's P/E ratio is -1.97. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to STHO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to STHO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check STHO's competition here
CWK vs OPAD Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OPAD has a market cap of 110.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while OPAD trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OPAD's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OPAD's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to OPAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check OPAD's competition here
CWK vs LODE Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LODE has a market cap of 89.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LODE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LODE's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LODE's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to LODE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LODE's competition here
CWK vs DOMA Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DOMA has a market cap of 89.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while DOMA trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas DOMA's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DOMA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to DOMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check DOMA's competition here
CWK vs MAYS Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MAYS has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while MAYS trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas MAYS's P/E ratio is -1283.33. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAYS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to MAYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check MAYS's competition here
CWK vs FTHM Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, FTHM has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while FTHM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas FTHM's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FTHM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to FTHM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check FTHM's competition here
CWK vs RFL Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, RFL has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while RFL trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas RFL's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RFL's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to RFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check RFL's competition here
CWK vs WE Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WE has a market cap of 44.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while WE trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas WE's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WE's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to WE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check WE's competition here
CWK vs CHG Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, CHG has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while CHG trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas CHG's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CHG's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to CHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check CHG's competition here
CWK vs AIRE Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AIRE has a market cap of 33.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while AIRE trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas AIRE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIRE's ROE of -5.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to AIRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check AIRE's competition here
CWK vs OMH Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OMH has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while OMH trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OMH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OMH's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to OMH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check OMH's competition here
CWK vs GYRO Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GYRO has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while GYRO trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas GYRO's P/E ratio is 45.83. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GYRO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to GYRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check GYRO's competition here
CWK vs LGPS Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LGPS has a market cap of 22.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LGPS trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LGPS's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LGPS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to LGPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LGPS's competition here
CWK vs LEJU Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LEJU has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LEJU trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LEJU's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LEJU's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to LEJU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LEJU's competition here
CWK vs DUO Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, DUO has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while DUO trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas DUO's P/E ratio is 0.24. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DUO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to DUO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check DUO's competition here
CWK vs WETH Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while WETH trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check WETH's competition here
CWK vs ALBT Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, ALBT has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while ALBT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas ALBT's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALBT's ROE of -54.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to ALBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check ALBT's competition here
CWK vs LRHC Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LRHC has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LRHC trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LRHC's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LRHC's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to LRHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LRHC's competition here
CWK vs AVCO Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, AVCO has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while AVCO trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas AVCO's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVCO's ROE of -125.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to AVCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check AVCO's competition here
CWK vs GBR Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, GBR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while GBR trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas GBR's P/E ratio is -87.93. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GBR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to GBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check GBR's competition here
CWK vs UOKA Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UOKA has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while UOKA trades at $2.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas UOKA's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UOKA's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to UOKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check UOKA's competition here
CWK vs MDJH Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, MDJH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while MDJH trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas MDJH's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MDJH's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to MDJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check MDJH's competition here
CWK vs SFRWW Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SFRWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while SFRWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SFRWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFRWW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to SFRWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check SFRWW's competition here
CWK vs SFR Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, SFR has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while SFR trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas SFR's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SFR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to SFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check SFR's competition here
CWK vs UK Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UK has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while UK trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas UK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UK's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to UK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check UK's competition here
CWK vs UKOMW Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, UKOMW has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while UKOMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas UKOMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UKOMW's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to UKOMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check UKOMW's competition here
CWK vs XHG Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, XHG has a market cap of 5.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while XHG trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas XHG's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XHG's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to XHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check XHG's competition here
CWK vs NTP Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, NTP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while NTP trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas NTP's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to NTP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check NTP's competition here
CWK vs LMRKN Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LMRKN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LMRKN trades at $25.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LMRKN's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to LMRKN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LMRKN's competition here
CWK vs LMRKP Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LMRKP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LMRKP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LMRKP's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to LMRKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LMRKP's competition here
CWK vs LMRK Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LMRK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LMRK trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LMRK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to LMRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LMRK's competition here
CWK vs LMRKO Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, LMRKO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while LMRKO trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas LMRKO's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LMRKO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to LMRKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check LMRKO's competition here
CWK vs IRCP Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, IRCP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while IRCP trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas IRCP's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IRCP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is less volatile compared to IRCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check IRCP's competition here
CWK vs BPY Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, BPY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while BPY trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas BPY's P/E ratio is -11.28. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BPY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to BPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check BPY's competition here
CWK vs OBAS Comparison August 2025
CWK plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CWK stands at 3.7B. In comparison, OBAS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CWK is priced at $15.99, while OBAS trades at $12.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CWK currently has a P/E ratio of 18.17, whereas OBAS's P/E ratio is -31.48. In terms of profitability, CWK's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBAS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CWK is more volatile compared to OBAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CWK.Check OBAS's competition here