Crawford & Company
Crawford & Company (CRD-A) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRD-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRD-A | $9.73 | +1.78% | 467.5M | 24.28 | $0.39 | +3.11% |
| MMC | $182.70 | -1.58% | 89.8B | 21.93 | $8.33 | +1.92% |
| MRSH | $173.86 | +1.74% | 84.3B | 20.40 | $8.44 | +2.04% |
| AON | $323.60 | +2.43% | 69.1B | 18.88 | $17.02 | +0.93% |
| AJG | $210.15 | +2.91% | 53.4B | 36.16 | $5.75 | +1.28% |
| WTW | $291.66 | +1.75% | 27.7B | 17.81 | $16.26 | +1.27% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.7B | 13.12 | $17.65 | N/A |
| BRO | $68.71 | +1.57% | 23.3B | 21.60 | $3.16 | +0.92% |
| ERIE | $248.87 | +2.40% | 11.4B | 23.12 | $10.68 | +2.25% |
| CRVL | $52.71 | +2.37% | 2.7B | 25.80 | $2.04 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRD-A vs MMC Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while MMC trades at $182.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MMC's competition here
CRD-A vs MRSH Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, MRSH has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while MRSH trades at $173.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas MRSH's P/E ratio is 20.40. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRSH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MRSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check MRSH's competition here
CRD-A vs AON Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while AON trades at $323.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check AON's competition here
CRD-A vs AJG Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while AJG trades at $210.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 36.16. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check AJG's competition here
CRD-A vs WTW Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while WTW trades at $291.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WTW's competition here
CRD-A vs WLTW Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WLTW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check WLTW's competition here
CRD-A vs BRO Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while BRO trades at $68.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BRO's competition here
CRD-A vs ERIE Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while ERIE trades at $248.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ERIE's competition here
CRD-A vs CRVL Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while CRVL trades at $52.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check CRVL's competition here
CRD-A vs ARX Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, ARX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while ARX trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas ARX's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ARX's ROE of -2.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to ARX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ARX's competition here
CRD-A vs BRP Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BRP's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BRP's competition here
CRD-A vs FANH Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check FANH's competition here
CRD-A vs BWIN Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while BWIN trades at $21.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -42.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check BWIN's competition here
CRD-A vs CRD-B Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 472.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while CRD-B trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to CRD-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check CRD-B's competition here
CRD-A vs TWFG Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 297.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while TWFG trades at $20.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 40.39. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check TWFG's competition here
CRD-A vs SLQT Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 117M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while SLQT trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -22.11. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SLQT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check SLQT's competition here
CRD-A vs EHTH Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while EHTH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EHTH's competition here
CRD-A vs GOCO Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 45.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while GOCO trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check GOCO's competition here
CRD-A vs ZBAO Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while ZBAO trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is -3.16. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check ZBAO's competition here
CRD-A vs EZRA Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, EZRA has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while EZRA trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas EZRA's P/E ratio is 1.76. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EZRA's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to EZRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EZRA's competition here
CRD-A vs RELI Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while RELI trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 2.24. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check RELI's competition here
CRD-A vs HUIZ Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 837.4K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while HUIZ trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 5.72. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check HUIZ's competition here
CRD-A vs TIRX Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 251.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while TIRX trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check TIRX's competition here
CRD-A vs EZRAW Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, EZRAW has a market cap of 98.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while EZRAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas EZRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EZRAW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to EZRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check EZRAW's competition here
CRD-A vs RELIW Comparison March 2026
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 467.5M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 44.3K. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $9.73, while RELIW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 24.28, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.Check RELIW's competition here