Crawford & Company
Crawford & Company CRD-A Peers
See (CRD-A) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Insurance - Brokers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRD-A | $10.91 | -4.88% | 528.13M | 18.18 | $0.60 | +2.56% |
| MMC | $228.93 | -0.81% | 112.80B | 28.09 | $8.15 | +1.42% |
| AJG | $337.66 | -0.78% | 86.47B | 52.19 | $6.47 | +0.73% |
| AON | $358.14 | -1.18% | 77.34B | 30.95 | $11.57 | +0.77% |
| BRO | $110.99 | -1.30% | 31.81B | 30.83 | $3.60 | +0.52% |
| WTW | $310.78 | -0.63% | 30.81B | -661.23 | -$0.47 | +1.14% |
| WLTW | $231.56 | -1.19% | 24.68B | 13.12 | $17.65 | +1.14% |
| ERIE | $353.99 | -4.05% | 16.35B | 30.18 | $11.73 | +1.49% |
| CRVL | $112.30 | -1.21% | 5.77B | 66.45 | $1.69 | N/A |
| BWIN | $37.66 | -2.54% | 2.57B | -71.06 | -$0.53 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRD-A vs MMC Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, MMC has a market cap of 112.80B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while MMC trades at $228.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas MMC's P/E ratio is 28.09. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to MMC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to MMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs AJG Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, AJG has a market cap of 86.47B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while AJG trades at $337.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas AJG's P/E ratio is 52.19. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AJG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AJG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs AON Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, AON has a market cap of 77.34B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while AON trades at $358.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas AON's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AON's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to AON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs BRO Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, BRO has a market cap of 31.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while BRO trades at $110.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas BRO's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs WTW Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, WTW has a market cap of 30.81B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while WTW trades at $310.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas WTW's P/E ratio is -661.23. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs WLTW Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, WLTW has a market cap of 24.68B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while WLTW trades at $231.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas WLTW's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to WLTW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to WLTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs ERIE Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, ERIE has a market cap of 16.35B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while ERIE trades at $353.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas ERIE's P/E ratio is 30.18. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ERIE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to ERIE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs CRVL Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, CRVL has a market cap of 5.77B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while CRVL trades at $112.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas CRVL's P/E ratio is 66.45. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRVL's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to CRVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs BWIN Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, BWIN has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while BWIN trades at $37.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas BWIN's P/E ratio is -71.06. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BWIN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs BRP Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, BRP has a market cap of 2.16B. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while BRP trades at $32.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas BRP's P/E ratio is -35.12. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BRP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to BRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs CRD-B Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, CRD-B has a market cap of 527.16M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while CRD-B trades at $10.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas CRD-B's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRD-B's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A and CRD-B have similar daily volatility (3.96).
CRD-A vs TWFG Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, TWFG has a market cap of 521.64M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while TWFG trades at $35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas TWFG's P/E ratio is 194.44. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TWFG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to TWFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs SLQT Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, SLQT has a market cap of 383.44M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while SLQT trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas SLQT's P/E ratio is -44.40. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SLQT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to SLQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs EHTH Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, EHTH has a market cap of 138.59M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while EHTH trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas EHTH's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EHTH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to EHTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs FANH Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, FANH has a market cap of 86.76M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while FANH trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas FANH's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FANH's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to FANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs GOCO Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, GOCO has a market cap of 66.39M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while GOCO trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas GOCO's P/E ratio is -42.79. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GOCO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to GOCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs ZBAO Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, ZBAO has a market cap of 34.36M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while ZBAO trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas ZBAO's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ZBAO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to ZBAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs TIRX Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, TIRX has a market cap of 13.94M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while TIRX trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas TIRX's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TIRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to TIRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs RELI Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, RELI has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while RELI trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas RELI's P/E ratio is 0.28. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RELI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to RELI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs RELIW Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, RELIW has a market cap of 3.45M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while RELIW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas RELIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RELIW's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is more volatile compared to RELIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.
CRD-A vs HUIZ Comparison
CRD-A plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRD-A stands at 528.13M. In comparison, HUIZ has a market cap of 1.01M. Regarding current trading prices, CRD-A is priced at $10.91, while HUIZ trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRD-A currently has a P/E ratio of 18.18, whereas HUIZ's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, CRD-A's ROE is +0.22%, compared to HUIZ's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRD-A is less volatile compared to HUIZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRD-A.